Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote in
: Properly installed, there is no honest advantage to a 8' antenna over a 3' antenna for small boats. For larger boats, that's a whole different ball of wax. :) It's not on larger boats, either. At 55' atop the mainmast of an Amel Sharki 40 ketch, the Metz easily outperforms the 8' monsters, which must be mounted lower. There is a problem with these "High Gain" antennas that's not addressed....BOATS ROLL AND PITCH. The horizontal radiation pattern of a 1/2 wave whip, like the end-fed Metz, looks just like a donut that has no hole with the whip sticking up where the hole should be. Its "gain" over the isotropic source is 3 db because of this donut. The isotropic source's radiation pattern is a sphere. If you took that sphere and pushed the north and south poles of it to the center, the sides bulge out twice as wide....the 3db measured at the equator, for you cartographers in the audience. The equator is fatter. Now, if we took that Metz radiation balloon, the donut, and put it between two plates in a vice, when we squeezed the vice, the balloon between the plates would be squeezed even more and its equator would bulge out even more as we flattened it so the plates were only an inch apart. (Our balloon can take any pressure.) This is what the radiation pattern looks like for the 8-9 db fiberglass colinear "whip", which is actually a phased array of 1/2 wave dipoles inside a fiberglass tube to hold them in place. 8' antennas have two dipoles spaced 1/2 wavelength apart to create this donut that looks like you stepped on it and flattened it. Now, this gain IS real gain AT THE EQUATOR when either whip is held pointing at zenith, straight up and down. Too bad your boat NEVER points it there, only in passing through it. The pattern is ALWAYS perpendicular to the plane of the whip passing through the middle of it. So, \ Tip of whip \ \ \ X Boat heeled this way \ \ \ \ Boat ^-pattern edge heeled to right God that's awful but its the best I can think of. AS you can see, the donut has tipped with the whip as the boat rolls. The pattern rolls, too! All the stations off to starboard or port DON'T see the signal caused by the EDGE of the donut. They see something MUCH less. How much less is determined by the tilt of the donut and how squished out it is. If it's squished hard, like the 8' whip (compared to the Metz' fat donut), the part of the pattern pointing at the receiving antenna afar is much less thick than the fat Metz donut. The effect of rolling and pitching at the receiver you're trying to impress is that the Metz antenna's signal at that far-off receiver runs a course from our reference signal, for this explanation, down to 60% of reference signal. The big whip's signal, on the other hand, being flatter produces about 20% more signal when the antenna is vertical, but the dip in signal as the boat rolls is down 80% or more because its donut is so squished. Very little signal points to the receiver when the donut is pitched over like this. That's what the REAL difference between them is, at sea, in the real world. If your VHF has an S-meter on it, watch it in rolling seas and you can see the other guy's rolling and pitching making it roll up and down as his donut's peak and minimum pass by you. The Metz, or any half- wave with the fat donut, has lots less pitch/roll fading and better comms when it really counts....precisely why the CG uses it on THEIR pitching and rolling craft in heavy weather. Besides, I've submarined the Metz on the jetboat a few times when the bow became a shovel.....and it survived what would rip the fiberglass whip right off, probably in splinters....(c; Larry -- Search youtube for "Depleted Uranium" The ultimate dirty bomb...... |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:15:24 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message oups.com... Proof that this NG does some good for boaters and is not all politics. I face the same issue in that I have an 8' antenna on my Tolman but recently installed a bimini and have not been sure of what to do about the antenna. Harry says his 3' antenna works fine and clears the bimini............ I installed a 3' antenna and Icom radio on the console of a Dauntless Whaler I had. No bimini, but I didn't want a long antenna in the way while fishing and the short, stainless whip could be bent over under the console grab rail, out of the way. It worked, but didn't have nearly the range of an 8 footer mounted higher up on a boat. As for 10 mile range? No way on mine. Maybe two at best. Eisboch Mine is mounted on a vertical rail on the side of my center console. When up, it just clears the underneath of the bimini, and the bimini clears the top of my head by at least six to eight inches, so I am guessing the tip of the antenna is somewhere close to 7' off the deck of the boat. It seems to work well for me, although I rarely use VHF, since almost everyone is on cell, even the guys I chat with who are fishing on their boats out on the bay. Do you have this radio: IC-M604 ? I think I like the Metz Manta 6 stainless whip antenna. It can easily be mounted to the console. No, I thought the IC-M504 was expensive enough. Bought all my electronics but the fishfinder from BOE in Annapolis. Good local prices. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:51:44 +0000, Larry wrote: John H. wrote in : Anyone - Is the performance of the 5' antenna seriously below that of the 8'er? None whatsoever. I got to the horizon on a Metz Manta 6 halfwave at butt level in a Sea Rayder jetboat all the time. VHF only goes to the horizon, line of sight. To get further, you must extend the horizon with ALTITUDE. 5' to 8' means nothing. Screw a bunch of sun-destroyed fiberglass rods. The Metz is guaranteed for life unless you lose the whip out of it. All the USCGs boats use the Metz, a testimonial to its rugged construction. Completely self-contained. No ground plane required. It'll work the horizon holding it in your hand. http://www.metzcommunication.com/manta6.htm Great company, too. This guy has it on sale: http://www.northeastmarineelectronics.com/index.asp? PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=2984 $34! That's half price! Larry Thanks for the tip, Larry. Another question: Most antennae seem to come with about 20 feet of wire. Mounted on a console with the radio right there, I could get by with about 3 feet of wire. Is all the extra wire necessary? No. You can cut the wire to the length you need. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:39 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:01:13 -0500, John H. penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: With the new Key West, I'm getting a bimini. The wife didn't think the t-top would give enough sun protection. In one of the shots of your boat, Harry, it appeared that you have the 8' antenna folded down, although it could have been a 5'er I guess. In any case, what do you have, and does it interfere with the bimini? Anyone - Is the performance of the 5' antenna seriously below that of the 8'er? By formula, 3' vs. 8' is about 2.74 miles difference in LoS..... which is fairly meaningless..... since we don't know the altitude of the other antenna. For safety, I rely on the height of the local 170+ foot USCG antenna, instead of the height of my own...... Receiver sensitivity is probably way more important than +-5' of antenna at the boat end.... unless you are trying to DSC some guy near the horizon.... ..... sooooo..... save that money on the antenna and spend it on the IC-M604... PS. What would you recommend in the $200-$250 range? M504 $277 http://www.byownerelectronics.com/st...3&cat=0&page=1 |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:23:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:11:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 25, 8:22 am, wrote: On Sep 25, 8:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:48:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Piffle. Your jealous nature is so obvious. Hats for pansies. This from a guy who wears his hat backwards, with the rim in the front! Cept when the boat is moving along, then he wears it right. Proof that this NG does some good for boaters and is not all politics. I face the same issue in that I have an 8' antenna on my Tolman but recently installed a bimini and have not been sure of what to do about the antenna. Harry says his 3' antenna works fine and clears the bimini............ VHF transmission range is a function of transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, and distance to the horizon, since VHF signals propagate under normal conditions as a line-of-sight phenomenon. The way to calculate the the theoretical line-of-sight horizon distance is: distance in miles = The square root of (1.5 X the height of the antenna from the water in feet) Since the CG is normally located at the highest possible place, you shouldn't have a problem sending and receiving to them. You *will* notice the difference when you are communicating with other boats. Which could impact on the ability to get a quick response to a Pan Pan or a MayDay call. I personally think a Hard Top with an ant. mounted on the top of the Hard Top would give you better coverage, without the inconvenience of the ant. and bimini straps being in your way as you fish. If you don't have the ability to easily walk around the boat, what is the advantage of a CC? When I'm using the boat for fishing, the bimini will be down. Walking around will not be a problem. An advantage of a CC, for me, is that I prefer to operate a boat in the standing position. If I were getting the boat just for my use, I'd go with the t-top, with perhaps a three foot antenna mounted on it. But, I expect to be pulling a lot of grandkids on tubes or skis, so the wife has a big say. (in my best SWF voice) Pansy. You wouldn't say that if you've ever taken 4-6 grandkids out on the boat at one time! nope and since one of my kids is in high school and none are married, that is a good thing. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:51:44 +0000, Larry wrote: John H. wrote in : Anyone - Is the performance of the 5' antenna seriously below that of the 8'er? None whatsoever. I got to the horizon on a Metz Manta 6 halfwave at butt level in a Sea Rayder jetboat all the time. VHF only goes to the horizon, line of sight. To get further, you must extend the horizon with ALTITUDE. 5' to 8' means nothing. Screw a bunch of sun-destroyed fiberglass rods. The Metz is guaranteed for life unless you lose the whip out of it. All the USCGs boats use the Metz, a testimonial to its rugged construction. Completely self-contained. No ground plane required. It'll work the horizon holding it in your hand. http://www.metzcommunication.com/manta6.htm Great company, too. This guy has it on sale: http://www.northeastmarineelectronics.com/index.asp? PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=2984 $34! That's half price! Larry Thanks for the tip, Larry. Another question: Most antennae seem to come with about 20 feet of wire. Mounted on a console with the radio right there, I could get by with about 3 feet of wire. Is all the extra wire necessary? No, but I was told that unless you know someone who can do a new connection as good as the old connection, (which I was told will not be done by the average DIY or boat mechanic) I was told it was better to just wind it into a ring use some velcro to keep it out of the way. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:23:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:11:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 25, 8:22 am, wrote: On Sep 25, 8:06 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:48:27 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Piffle. Your jealous nature is so obvious. Hats for pansies. This from a guy who wears his hat backwards, with the rim in the front! Cept when the boat is moving along, then he wears it right. Proof that this NG does some good for boaters and is not all politics. I face the same issue in that I have an 8' antenna on my Tolman but recently installed a bimini and have not been sure of what to do about the antenna. Harry says his 3' antenna works fine and clears the bimini............ VHF transmission range is a function of transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, and distance to the horizon, since VHF signals propagate under normal conditions as a line-of-sight phenomenon. The way to calculate the the theoretical line-of-sight horizon distance is: distance in miles = The square root of (1.5 X the height of the antenna from the water in feet) Since the CG is normally located at the highest possible place, you shouldn't have a problem sending and receiving to them. You *will* notice the difference when you are communicating with other boats. Which could impact on the ability to get a quick response to a Pan Pan or a MayDay call. I personally think a Hard Top with an ant. mounted on the top of the Hard Top would give you better coverage, without the inconvenience of the ant. and bimini straps being in your way as you fish. If you don't have the ability to easily walk around the boat, what is the advantage of a CC? When I'm using the boat for fishing, the bimini will be down. Walking around will not be a problem. An advantage of a CC, for me, is that I prefer to operate a boat in the standing position. If I were getting the boat just for my use, I'd go with the t-top, with perhaps a three foot antenna mounted on it. But, I expect to be pulling a lot of grandkids on tubes or skis, so the wife has a big say. (in my best SWF voice) Pansy. You wouldn't say that if you've ever taken 4-6 grandkids out on the boat at one time! |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:39 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:01:13 -0500, John H. penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: With the new Key West, I'm getting a bimini. The wife didn't think the t-top would give enough sun protection. In one of the shots of your boat, Harry, it appeared that you have the 8' antenna folded down, although it could have been a 5'er I guess. In any case, what do you have, and does it interfere with the bimini? Anyone - Is the performance of the 5' antenna seriously below that of the 8'er? By formula, 3' vs. 8' is about 2.74 miles difference in LoS..... which is fairly meaningless..... since we don't know the altitude of the other antenna. For safety, I rely on the height of the local 170+ foot USCG antenna, instead of the height of my own...... Receiver sensitivity is probably way more important than +-5' of antenna at the boat end.... unless you are trying to DSC some guy near the horizon.... ..... sooooo..... save that money on the antenna and spend it on the IC-M604... $500! Damn! Do I really need that for an 18' boat that will probably never get out of sight of land? |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:15:24 -0400, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message oups.com... Proof that this NG does some good for boaters and is not all politics. I face the same issue in that I have an 8' antenna on my Tolman but recently installed a bimini and have not been sure of what to do about the antenna. Harry says his 3' antenna works fine and clears the bimini............ I installed a 3' antenna and Icom radio on the console of a Dauntless Whaler I had. No bimini, but I didn't want a long antenna in the way while fishing and the short, stainless whip could be bent over under the console grab rail, out of the way. It worked, but didn't have nearly the range of an 8 footer mounted higher up on a boat. As for 10 mile range? No way on mine. Maybe two at best. Eisboch Mine is mounted on a vertical rail on the side of my center console. When up, it just clears the underneath of the bimini, and the bimini clears the top of my head by at least six to eight inches, so I am guessing the tip of the antenna is somewhere close to 7' off the deck of the boat. It seems to work well for me, although I rarely use VHF, since almost everyone is on cell, even the guys I chat with who are fishing on their boats out on the bay. Do you have this radio: IC-M604 ? I think I like the Metz Manta 6 stainless whip antenna. It can easily be mounted to the console. |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:51:44 +0000, Larry wrote:
John H. wrote in : Anyone - Is the performance of the 5' antenna seriously below that of the 8'er? None whatsoever. I got to the horizon on a Metz Manta 6 halfwave at butt level in a Sea Rayder jetboat all the time. VHF only goes to the horizon, line of sight. To get further, you must extend the horizon with ALTITUDE. 5' to 8' means nothing. Screw a bunch of sun-destroyed fiberglass rods. The Metz is guaranteed for life unless you lose the whip out of it. All the USCGs boats use the Metz, a testimonial to its rugged construction. Completely self-contained. No ground plane required. It'll work the horizon holding it in your hand. http://www.metzcommunication.com/manta6.htm Great company, too. This guy has it on sale: http://www.northeastmarineelectronics.com/index.asp? PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=2984 $34! That's half price! Larry Thanks for the tip, Larry. Another question: Most antennae seem to come with about 20 feet of wire. Mounted on a console with the radio right there, I could get by with about 3 feet of wire. Is all the extra wire necessary? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question for Harry | General | |||
SSB antenna question | Electronics | |||
GR100 - antenna question | Electronics | |||
Antenna question | Electronics | |||
SSB Antenna Question | Electronics |