On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.

But, I won't make any derogatory statements about any of you.

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:16:03 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.


Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.

Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.
There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring
you there?

See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.




Why is Herring "answering" me? He and that other douchebag, Reggie
Retardo, are not on my "read" or "respond" list. Hell, my email filter
has Herring and his aliases *blacklisted."

I answer you because you address me. That's simple. You address me because
you read my posts. That's also simple. Your 'filter' is about as real as
your lobsta boat. That's very simple!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the
desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're
discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll
bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up
with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357
Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to
buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
.357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.


You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want
to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4ax. com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK
wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the
desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the
same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're
discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten
reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll
bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer
to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown
anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up
with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up
sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357
Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites.
I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to
buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
.357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.


You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want
to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns.


Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38
frame.

Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even
know what a grip insert was!

Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change
your diaper.

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
..357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the
desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're
discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll
bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up
with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357
Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to
buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
.357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.


You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want
to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns.


Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38
frame.

Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even
know what a grip insert was!

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:00:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4ax .com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK
wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the
desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the
same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're
discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten
reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll
bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer
to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown
anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up
with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up
sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357
Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites.
I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to
buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
.357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.


You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want
to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns.


Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38
frame.

Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even
know what a grip insert was!

Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change
your diaper.


Y'all just can't stand being wrong! Hell, it's no big deal to say, "Whoops,
I was wrong." But I guess that when you've called someone a god damned guy
and a moron, not to mention the comments you and Harry and JimH manage,
it's pretty tough.

Trust me, Doug, if a site proving your point existed, you'd be shoving it
down my throat!

And no, I'm not all alone. You persist in answering. The others read but
know better than to answer, 'cause they can't find anything either!

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:58:14 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

You could take a proactive approach and let your property return to a
wild state.

I have done just that. I have three acres and have let about 2.5 acres
revert to the natural state, including a pond. I have a lot of
wildlife and have the opportunity to observe them..... without feeding
them.

Sounds like a good plan. No one really needs more than a half acre or
so for house and lawn.

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:18:39 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:05:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:



Careful. You sound like some "folks" who think anyone who reads and learns
is an elitist.

Hmm. Typical educated cop response.

--Vic

Quota? Nah. I can write as many tickets as I want.


Ahhhhhh

Joey is a cop?

ROFLMAO

Did you tell all your buddies here how you lost a HALF MILLION DOLLARS
to me?

--
Scott in Florida

About all I can say for the United States Senate
is that it opens with a prayer and
closes with an investigation.

Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:00:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r3h3e3h2vt0tmbfm2lbfmvpcof8kavoaq1@4ax. com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4a x.com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK
wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the
desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the
same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're
discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten
reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is
your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll
bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer
to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown
anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a
.38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up
with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've
not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up
sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357
Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen
sites.
I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible
to
buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating
the
.357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.


You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you
want
to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns.


Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38
frame.

Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even
know what a grip insert was!

Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change
your diaper.


Y'all just can't stand being wrong! Hell, it's no big deal to say,
"Whoops,
I was wrong." But I guess that when you've called someone a god damned guy
and a moron, not to mention the comments you and Harry and JimH manage,
it's pretty tough.

Trust me, Doug, if a site proving your point existed, you'd be shoving it
down my throat!

And no, I'm not all alone. You persist in answering. The others read but
know better than to answer, 'cause they can't find anything either!


Are you always this lazy? This is strange, coming from a guy who used to
bitch about his students being less than wonderful.