On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:01:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Are you going to show us a picture every time a number changes on your
meters? I hope so, because I value your posts.

At least it's about boats.

John, I sincerely believe you could do the newsgroup a favor by
following a little less closely. I think Harry's foibles are pretty
well understood by most folks here without you and and a few others
making special efforts to point them out.

Lead by example.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:01:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Are you going to show us a picture every time a number changes on your
meters? I hope so, because I value your posts.

At least it's about boats.

John, I sincerely believe you could do the newsgroup a favor by
following a little less closely. I think Harry's foibles are pretty
well understood by most folks here without you and and a few others
making special efforts to point them out.

Lead by example.


I've got lots of boat pictures and commentaries, going back many
decades. If I dump them all here, I wonder if Herring will do the
newsgroup a favor and stand on the top of a tall hill on a golf course
during a thunderstorm.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:29:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:01:21 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Are you going to show us a picture every time a number changes on your
meters? I hope so, because I value your posts.

At least it's about boats.

John, I sincerely believe you could do the newsgroup a favor by
following a little less closely. I think Harry's foibles are pretty
well understood by most folks here without you and and a few others
making special efforts to point them out.

Lead by example.

Ah yes, his 'foibles' are kind of cute, aren't they? Hell, it's just Harry
being Harry.
--
John H

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:03:16 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Ah yes, his 'foibles' are kind of cute, aren't they? Hell, it's just Harry
being Harry.

I just reread my post looking for any mention of *cute*.

Can't find it.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:06:08 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:03:16 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Ah yes, his 'foibles' are kind of cute, aren't they? Hell, it's just Harry
being Harry.

I just reread my post looking for any mention of *cute*.

Can't find it.

That was my adjective. It seems to be the opinion of a few folks
hereabouts. I'm glad to see you caught his 'drill instructor' comments. I
agree, his knowledge of DI's probably came from the movies.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H