When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:



It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:



It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in the
foolishness that goes on here.

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:07:55 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:



It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in the
foolishness that goes on here.


It has nothing to do with Dan.
--
John H

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in the
foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant
in the foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

Hmmm... more crickets

"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a
few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

Hmmm... more crickets

Now you're patting yourself on the back for your own posts?? Pathetic!
Dopey Dan indeed!

Don White wrote:
"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a
few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H

John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.


Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?
Hmmm... more crickets

Now you're patting yourself on the back for your own posts?? Pathetic!
Dopey Dan indeed!



You can't resist, can you? It's clear why your adult child lives at
home. It's a shame he didn't have a better role model.