On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:19:30 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.. .

"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:



It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.


John is only fighting for a more positive image of gay men. Public restroom
sex is obviously not one of those images he wants promoted.


JimH, you're showing the same lack of class exhibited by Harry.
--
John H

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:51:07 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a
few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H

John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.


John is only fighting for a more positive image of gay men. Public
restroom sex is obviously not one of those images he wants promoted.





Herring tries soooooo hard to be relevant...somewhere.


I'd like to know why my name is in the subject header.

Eisboch


The OP was meant for you.
--
John H

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:52:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Jim wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind
of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK
wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room
at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than
a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H

John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing
participant in the foolishness that goes on here.


John is only fighting for a more positive image of gay men. Public
restroom sex is obviously not one of those images he wants promoted.





Herring tries soooooo hard to be relevant...somewhere.


I'd like to know why my name is in the subject header.

Eisboch

I was wondering that myself. The answer lies rattling around in John H's
brain.



Oh. I thought it would be obvious, which is why I didn't respond
directly. Herring is engaged in his never-ending quest to try to "trash"
me as many times a day as possible, and he's trying to enlist others in
his cause. He has a couple of other targets, too. Herring denies all of
this, of course, and claims he isn't doing anything snarky. It's the
same sort of crap in which Reggie Retardo engages. That's one of the
reasons why both of them, and a few others, are permanent residents of
my bozo bin. They have nothing to offer here, and show up only to try to
dump on other posters.



Harry, you do quite well at trashing yourself.
--
John H

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in the
foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

William Bruce wrote:
Does anyone anywhere give a flying fruitloop what Herring thinks?

Harold, do you realize how you sound? So far, there is no evidence that
John suffers from any mental illness, unlike another member whose illness
makes his posts irrelevant as, uh, what was the term ... flying fruitloops.



Well said.

Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant
in the foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

Hmmm... more crickets

"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a
few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H


John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.



Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?

Hmmm... more crickets

Now you're patting yourself on the back for your own posts?? Pathetic!
Dopey Dan indeed!

Don White wrote:
"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
When I commented on responding to Harry's posts, it was this kind of
thing
that causes my attitude:

***********************************************

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:41:30 -0400, HK wrote:


It's either *here* for Dingy Dan or hanging out in the men's room at
the
airport, hoping to "get lucky."

************************************************

Of course, a response may be, "Well, that's just Harry. Other than a
few
posts like that he's a really interesting and neat guy."

Right. And he'll keep it up as long as folks say, "Well, that's just
Harry."

No response necessary.
--
John H

John... why worry about Dan.... he's more than a willing participant in
the foolishness that goes on here.


Does that make you a troll, Dopey Don?
Hmmm... more crickets

Now you're patting yourself on the back for your own posts?? Pathetic!
Dopey Dan indeed!



You can't resist, can you? It's clear why your adult child lives at
home. It's a shame he didn't have a better role model.

"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .

You can't resist, can you? It's clear why your adult child lives at home.
It's a shame he didn't have a better role model.


You know, I look at it as a compliment. Your kids (if you have any) would
probably be scheming to get away from you from Jr high on...
My son doesn't seem to mind the old man's company....we share meals, a beer
etc. I hope we still maintain a reasonably close relationship when he
does move out, get married, whatever.

Don White wrote:
"Dan" intrceptor@gmaildotcom wrote in message
.. .
You can't resist, can you? It's clear why your adult child lives at home.
It's a shame he didn't have a better role model.


You know, I look at it as a compliment. Your kids (if you have any) would
probably be scheming to get away from you from Jr high on...
My son doesn't seem to mind the old man's company....we share meals, a beer
etc. I hope we still maintain a reasonably close relationship when he
does move out, get married, whatever.



Believe what you want but you already said he was *lazy*. He tolerates
your company while he gets cheap room and board. Maybe by Canadian
standards he's too young to leave the nest.