| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 28, 12:01?pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... You're just sliding down that hill again, Chuck. Your goal, stated or otherwise, is to promote anything and all things that might sell boats. I have no ongoing business interests in the boating world. I think hanging large appendages out of the bottom of a plastic pleasure boat is inherently risky and certainly riskier than the typical inboard prop shaft and rudder combo. A steel commercial vessel with watertight compartments and bulkheads, well, that's different, eh? Harry, you seem to be taking the position that the only safe type of engine on a small pleasure boat is an outboard (probably run like I used to as a kid ... with the latch disengaged so if you hit bottom or something, the engine just pivoted up). Nothing wrong with an outboard, if fact I'd prefer it to an I/O, but both are not practical for some boats. I've seen a SeaRay with conventional twin screws and rudders have the entire strut on one side ripped out of the hull when it's prop picked up and wrapped a submerged 2" hawser. I also recently saw a mangled mess of props, bent shafts and a hole almost 2 feet long in a boat that got out of the channel in Wood's Hole and ran up on the rocks. Eisboch No, that is not my position. Though on a *small* power pleasure boat like mine, I don't believe inboards make much sense. On straight inboard boats, I prefer the shafts and drives be at least partially protected by a significant keel ahead of those appendages. There are plenty of inboards with such bottom protection. But even bare struts, shafts and props present less of an inviting target and probably don't hang down as low as these new variations on I/O drives that come through the bottom of the hull. Plus they are very complex, just the sort of thing you need when "cruising" to faraway ports. You have a point on the complexity issue. Otherwise you are enunciating through your fedora, especially when it comes to protection. The entire keel and the foreward sections of the hull protrude substantially deeper than the Zeus drives on the 41 GB. Visualize a semi displacement hull, instead of a planing hull, and you may be able to appreciate why the Zeus drives are not unduly exposed. The total surface exposure is much less than with traditional exposed shafts and struts, and a serious wack may be substantially less likely to sink the boat. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| SEI Stern drives? | General | |||
| 290 drives volov | UK Power Boats | |||
| An Authentic Collectible Ship Model win hearts of many with beautiful exclusive hand built model ships from scratch. | General | |||
| trannies and drives | General | |||
| Are V-Drives and Velvet Drives the same thing? | General | |||