I asked:

Funny, you don't direct him to Pasco's site where he praises the Sea Ray
build
quality. Why is that, exactly?

Larry replied:

A picture is worth a thousand boat magazine ads......

No, no, no. I'm not suggesting that you should direct people to boating
magazine ads.

Allow me to restate:

Every time Sea Ray is mentioned in the NG, you trot out that link to one of
David Pasco's sites. It shows serious delamination on an old Sea Ray, with a
bunch of mismatched mystery goop behind the glass that is visually apparent to
differ from the original build material. As in this case, you say, "See what
you're buying! Look how Sea Ray is made!" You rely on David Pasco as an
authority to support your opinion.

So, my question is, why do you never direct people to the portion of the same
Pasco site where he discusses Sea Ray in depth (might even be the same model
the last guy asked about), and where he concludes that Sea Ray, although it has
a few faults, remains one of the best built boats you can buy?

Is it fair to use somebody as an authority to support your opinion if you're
going to
take one small item and blow it out of context and proportion while ignoring
that same person's extensive discussion of the actual boat in question?

Are you saying that Pasco's comments specific to Sea Ray are a "boating
magazine ad"?

And one final question, tongue in cheek.
You say:


A picture is worth a thousand boat magazine ads......

Hmmm. What if the boating magazine ad includes a picture? :-)

On 27 Aug 2003 16:52:05 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:


Every time Sea Ray is mentioned in the NG, you trot out that link to one of
David Pasco's sites. It shows serious delamination on an old Sea Ray, with a
bunch of mismatched mystery goop behind the glass that is visually apparent to
differ from the original build material. As in this case, you say, "See what
you're buying! Look how Sea Ray is made!" You rely on David Pasco as an
authority to support your opinion.

No, not at all, oh spinning person......I rely on the PICTURES of pure
**** to drive home the point. They're not as stupid as you think.
They CAN think for themselves. Sea Ray hasn't sued Pascoe to get
falst statements and pictures off the net, have they?

I don't give a damn if Pascoe never typed a thing on this
website.....Just LOOK AT THE PICTURES is more than enough exposure to
the average Joe to tell he doesn't want to expose his family to this
kind or crap, from ANY boat company....



Larry W4CSC

Isn't it becoming more practical by the day to make
Iraq's desert the new World Nuclear Waste Disposal Site?

No, not at all, oh spinning person......I rely on the PICTURES of pure
**** to drive home the point. They're not as stupid as you think.
They CAN think for themselves. Sea Ray hasn't sued Pascoe to get
falst statements and pictures off the net, have they?

I don't give a damn if Pascoe never typed a thing on this
website.....Just LOOK AT THE PICTURES is more than enough exposure to
the average Joe to tell he doesn't want to expose his family to this
kind or crap, from ANY boat company....



Larry W4CSC

Isn't it becoming more practical by the day to make
Iraq's desert the new World Nuclear Waste Disposal Site?


Looking at the pictures, oh angry and cursing person, is most beneficial when
one has the expertise to evaluate what is seen.

Just like Fox News, we should strive to be fair and balanced. Here's a comment
from
David Pasco regarding Sea Ray's general quality. What do you suppose he means
when he uses the phrases "hard to beat"
and "excellent (used boat) value"?

Quote:

Summing up: On the outside, the overall quality is pretty good. Not much
chintzy hardware, and the basic structures are holding up well. With care, it
still looks good. The rub rails aren't all loose, dented and falling off, and
stress cracking is minimal. As a used boat, it offers excellent value. As a new
boat, they're still hard to beat quality wise, but the quality margin over the
competition can be a pretty thin line at times.