Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...

And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here, please view the video. It'll give you some idea of how sick
O'Reilly really is...

http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchiv...reilly_sc.html

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

And here's one that shows he doesn't give a flying **** about facts...

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/05/oreilly-lies/

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 5:47 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
A bunch of stuff he heard, which was quickly debunked as plain rubbish.

Still nothing?? You don't really watch fox, you just said that. Of
course, the whole buying into the Media Matters story about Bill
really gave you away. Later, going fishing now, there's nothing to
see
here.

You, apparently, aren't among those with at least half a brain who know
O'Reilly paints with the broadest brush in the universe and that he
doesn't give a **** about facts, only ratings.

His loud, obnoxious, testosterone-driven, know-it-all style is a front
so pinheads like you will believe him. You a fan of Rush Limbaugh too?

jps

Parse this instead...
 

In article .com,
says...

And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Another by Bill Moyers, perhaps one of the most astute and honorable men
of this generation.

Here's what he has to say about his exchange with Bill O.

http://www.current.org/news/news0222BillvBill.html

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 6:28 pm, jps wrote:
In article . com,
says...







jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

jps wrote:

Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the
gall to share your rich fantasy.

jps

I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With
both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with
HEI.

I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they
initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right
off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a
lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors
if I had to.

On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on
going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add
even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under
load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet.

For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try.

Should have just broken down and purchased Mallory electronic
distributors. Cheap freakin' Republican.

jps

Both of my boat distributors are Mallory, and you tell me where I an
get a brand new Mallory electronic distributor for the price of a
Pertronix kit ($69.00!)

I'm glad you arn't running the world.....

Pinhead:

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit.

Sucker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Send them to Mallory and they'll convert them for you for $100/unit?

Far cry from $69.00 a piece for Pertronix. Conver them? I said NEW.
not converted.

Excellent economics!

And you call me a sucker.

You're a bigger fool than I thought.

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:


Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Parse this instead...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...

Parse this instead...
 

On Jul 11, 7:18 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:





"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge? ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You noted the problems attributed to the current administration, you
do not make mistakes like that.. c'mon Chuck, it was a troll...

Parse this instead...
 

In article , "JimH" ask
says...

Nice short reply :-)


Thanks. To the point and factual. I can give you some training on doing
so if you wish. ;-)

Chuck,

You really should jump at the chance. He can teach you the finer points
of netcoping for sure.

jps