![]() |
Parse this instead...
On Jul 10, 12:29 am, jps wrote:
Let them apologize for their foolishness... and I'll go back to writing exclusively about boating in this newsgroup. jps ROTF! Remind me again when you ever posted anything here about boating. |
Parse this instead...
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:55:28 -0700, jps wrote:
Parse this instead, it's far more useful: WASHINGTON - An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003. The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation. The nature of Plame's CIA employment never came up in Libby's perjury and obstruction of justice trial. Undercover travel The unclassified summary of Plame's employment with the CIA at the time that syndicated columnist Robert Novak published her name on July 14, 2003 says, "Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for who the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States." Plame worked as an operations officer in the Directorate of Operations and was assigned to the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) in January 2002 at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. The employment history indicates that while she was assigned to CPD, Plame, "engaged in temporary duty travel overseas on official business." The report says, "she traveled at least seven times to more than ten times." When overseas Plame traveled undercover, "sometimes in true name and sometimes in alias -- but always using cover -- whether official or non-official (NOC) -- with no ostensible relationship to the CIA." ......*was*..... There, it's been parsed. -- John H |
Parse this instead...
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:29:53 -0700, jps wrote:
In article .com, says... in the group of folks who won't (quite) always be wrong have to be our esteemed friends with a more conservative perspective. It is just such a willingness to be frank, self critical, inclusive, and willing to accept the opposition as worthy individuals of merit and intelligence (rather than "enemies of the state") that marks an important difference between liberal ideology and the politics of hate, blame, and recrimination preached by the Limbaughs, Hannitys, Savages, etc of the world. Chuck, All our "conservative" friends would have to do is admit they were complete idiots for having ever having believed that the Bush/Cheney Iraq war was anything but a grab for the world's biggest nearly unaffiliated pool of oil (it just needed to be liberated from Saddam). You and the rest of folks from the left suffered through so much bull**** when this was all coming down. I want to read their admissions that they were freakin' idiots. Even Republican leadership is giving up on these bald faced liars. Only fools would continue to believe this administration is about anything but protecting the rich and richer and all their agendum. Let them admit they were sucked in by a group of ill-inspired jackasses that have reduced this country's ability to compete in the world while setting us on a rotten footing morally, ethically and spiritually, who're now threatening the very foundation of our republic by thwarting and stonewalling the two other branches of government. If this were Democrats taking the country down, our conservative friends would be peering through the blinds of their media rooms with their semi-automatic weapons in hand, looking for cars bearing Kerry/Edwards stickers to shoot at. Let them apologize for their foolishness... and I'll go back to writing exclusively about boating in this newsgroup. jps a.politics -- John H |
Parse this instead...
ps. there's a header over there with your name on it, and the field is wide
open! -- John H |
Parse this instead...
On Jul 10, 6:24 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:25:34 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: One of the basic fundamentals of liberalism is inclusion. ~~ cough - hack - spitootie ~~ Man, they must have some real good herb out there. :) Speaking of not knowing the difference ;) Old couple sitting on the porch. Old lady gets up and slaps the old man off his chair. As he gets up he asks his wife of 60 years, why she had hit him? She answered, "that's for having a small member". Next day, old lady gets up and slaps old man off chair. Again he asks why? She says "that's fo being a lousy lover". Next day old man gets up and slaps woman off chair, she asks why? He answeres, "that's for knowing the difference!". Oh well, hope I don't have to slap you! I am too old to take an ass whoopin' |
Parse this instead...
In article , jherring1
@yahoo.com says... On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:55:28 -0700, jps wrote: Parse this instead, it's far more useful: WASHINGTON - An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003. The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation. The nature of Plame's CIA employment never came up in Libby's perjury and obstruction of justice trial. Undercover travel The unclassified summary of Plame's employment with the CIA at the time that syndicated columnist Robert Novak published her name on July 14, 2003 says, "Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for who the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States." Plame worked as an operations officer in the Directorate of Operations and was assigned to the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) in January 2002 at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. The employment history indicates that while she was assigned to CPD, Plame, "engaged in temporary duty travel overseas on official business." The report says, "she traveled at least seven times to more than ten times." When overseas Plame traveled undercover, "sometimes in true name and sometimes in alias -- but always using cover -- whether official or non-official (NOC) -- with no ostensible relationship to the CIA." .....*was*..... "at the time" parsed even more. |
Parse this instead...
"jps" wrote in message ... Parse this instead, it's far more useful: WASHINGTON - An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003. Then why isn't Richard Armitage being charged with a crime? |
Parse this instead...
|
Parse this instead...
"jps" wrote in message ... In article yNOki.1784$YH3.1657@trnddc08, says... "jps" wrote in message ... Parse this instead, it's far more useful: WASHINGTON - An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003. Then why isn't Richard Armitage being charged with a crime? He should be. We're just a little too busy with the troubles at hand. LOL! You do know that Fitzgerald knew Armitage was the leaker from the very start, don't you? There were all sorts of things congress and the justice department could have been doing when they were pursuing Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Were you complaining back then? I would have if Gore was being tried for Bubba's lying. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com