![]() |
Parse this instead...
JimH wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Man it's hot outside. Freakin' Global Warming... Same here.........temps in the 90's. You have to feel for the roofers, construction workers and road workers. I collected garbage for the city of Parma for 2 summers when I was in high school. Even when you are in shape days like this are tough. Cold front coming through tonight. Man.......we need some rain! It already hit here. thismorning the fron stepped in and temp dropped to 68 degrees at 6:30 am. temp now is about 82 and very low humidity, and nary a cloud in the sky. |
Parse this instead...
|
Parse this instead...
On Jul 11, 3:01 pm, jps wrote:
And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid... OH MY GOD. I knew this was all the Clinton's fault all along. "I speculate they did not tell Bush everything" as if you'd be in a position to speculate on such a thing. I was mocking you dork! I know none of you have the integerity to seriously answer the question. Whatever Sandy Berger destroyed can't be 1/1000th of what Bush destroys on a daily basis. If Clinton commuted the sentence of an aide who could have been instrumental in impeachment proceedings, you'd have simultaneously **** your pants and popped an artery. What, retarded, childish speculation? Are you a hypocryte or just liar? Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the gall to share your rich fantasy. Again, speculation based on nothing at all but ideology and childish emotion. If I were your boss I would fire you, I have noticed that spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of trouble in their ever constant self indulgence. jps |
Parse this instead...
|
Parse this instead...
On Jul 11, 3:01 pm, jps wrote:
Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the gall to share your rich fantasy. jps- You never even watched FOX. But regurgetated lies are fine for the intellectually lazy. It's not FOX bias Hillary and others are afraid of, they have been guaranteed unedited interviews. It is the idea of having to actually answer a question without the benefit of a 10 second talking point, and the possiblily of having to answer a followup quesiton. It gets me that otherwise good folks can just spout this kind of crap to protect those they know could never stand up to a real news confrence with unscripted questions. But you just keep saying it, at least half of the folks you debate will know how ignorant, or at least dishonest you really are. |
Parse this instead...
On Jul 11, 4:08 pm, HK wrote:
wrote: I have noticed that spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of trouble in their ever constant self indulgence. Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his self-indulgent bull****. I would love to, can you state any facts or just more talking points designed to deflect from the Dems, no plan, plan... |
Parse this instead...
|
Parse this instead...
On Jul 11, 4:38 pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jul 11, 4:08 pm, HK wrote: wrote: I have noticed that spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of trouble in their ever constant self indulgence. Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his self-indulgent bull****. I would love to, can you state any facts or just more talking points designed to deflect from the Dems, no plan, plan... Facts about the problems Cheney has created for us and the rest of the world with his self-indulgent bull****? There isn't enough bandwidth on the internet for sort of dissertation. You really need to unplug yourself from reich-wing media...or else get a higher pair of jackboots. So, you really have no facts then? |
Parse this instead...
|
Parse this instead...
jps wrote: Not even Fox (Republican talking points distributor) News would have the gall to share your rich fantasy. jps I'm a republican and I don't talk points distributors anymore. With both of my boats, I've gotten rid of the ignition points and gone with HEI. I installed Pertronix ignition kits in both. I really can't say they initially start any easier, but after warm up, the engines kick right off with very little effort. The performance is snappier, and I get a lot better fuel per hr. I wouldn't go back to pioints distributors if I had to. On my 23' Marquis with the 5.7 GM (350 chevy) I'm even thinking on going with an "MSD" (Multiple Discharge System) to see if I can add even more spark performance. on cruise they don't do much, but under load at 4000 rpm, I think the engine will perform better yet. For no more than a MSD kit costs, It's at least worth a try. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com