| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The pressure created by the prop pushing the boat is orders of magnitude
greater than anything you could attribute to spinning the weight of the prop. The different between aluminum and ss would not be noticable. "Josh Assing" wrote in message ... I purchased 2 props (both alumininum) to reprop with. The guy agreed with me that if I hit stuff; it's better to destroy the prop than the outsdrive -- but for performance, a ss is the way to go. he said the weight issue is silly because it's underwater and doesn't weigh as much and that no one would use ss if it wore out the outdrive faster. So -- Here I am; for curiosity sake; asking you if the weight of a ss prop really does wear out the drive faster than an aluminum one. -j |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Semi-interesting discussion. But, essentially meaningless because propeller
selection is impossible to pinpoint except through trial and error. Any number of computer programs can select the "perfect" prop for your boat engine combination except they won't except by luck. They'll get you close but perfection is only acheived by trial and error. Furthermore, the perfect prop for one set of conditions will not be the perfect prop for all. Do you want perfect hole shot performance? One prop. Do you want maximum speed? A different prop. Do you want optimum economy at lowest RPM? Yet another prop. Whatever prop you choose will be a compromise and provide perfect performance for only one, if any, operating condition. All we can do is strive for a prop that provides good all around performance and economy. As to the original question from the OP.... as Clams pointed out, it's about enertia. Butch "jamesgangnc" wrote in message nk.net... The pressure created by the prop pushing the boat is orders of magnitude greater than anything you could attribute to spinning the weight of the prop. The different between aluminum and ss would not be noticable. "Josh Assing" wrote in message ... I purchased 2 props (both alumininum) to reprop with. The guy agreed with me that if I hit stuff; it's better to destroy the prop than the outsdrive -- but for performance, a ss is the way to go. he said the weight issue is silly because it's underwater and doesn't weigh as much and that no one would use ss if it wore out the outdrive faster. So -- Here I am; for curiosity sake; asking you if the weight of a ss prop really does wear out the drive faster than an aluminum one. -j |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Unlubberizing the Single Screw Inboard, Part II | General | |||
| 3 weeks old, and outdrive scuffed, prop nicked | General | |||
| Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) | Cruising | |||
| Great info piece on towing and tongue weight SenZbar site | Cruising | |||
| Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? | General | |||