Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 366
Default weight of prop vs. the outdrive.

The pressure created by the prop pushing the boat is orders of magnitude
greater than anything you could attribute to spinning the weight of the
prop. The different between aluminum and ss would not be noticable.

"Josh Assing" wrote in message
...
I purchased 2 props (both alumininum) to reprop with.
The guy agreed with me that if I hit stuff; it's better to destroy the
prop than
the outsdrive -- but for performance, a ss is the way to go.

he said the weight issue is silly because it's underwater and doesn't
weigh as
much and that no one would use ss if it wore out the outdrive faster.

So -- Here I am; for curiosity sake; asking you if the weight of a ss prop
really does wear out the drive faster than an aluminum one.

-j



  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 102
Default weight of prop vs. the outdrive.

Semi-interesting discussion. But, essentially meaningless because propeller
selection is impossible to pinpoint except through trial and error. Any
number of computer programs can select the "perfect" prop for your boat
engine combination except they won't except by luck. They'll get you close
but perfection is only acheived by trial and error. Furthermore, the
perfect prop for one set of conditions will not be the perfect prop for all.

Do you want perfect hole shot performance? One prop. Do you want maximum
speed? A different prop. Do you want optimum economy at lowest RPM? Yet
another prop. Whatever prop you choose will be a compromise and provide
perfect performance for only one, if any, operating condition. All we can
do is strive for a prop that provides good all around performance and
economy.

As to the original question from the OP.... as Clams pointed out, it's about
enertia.

Butch
"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
nk.net...
The pressure created by the prop pushing the boat is orders of magnitude
greater than anything you could attribute to spinning the weight of the
prop. The different between aluminum and ss would not be noticable.

"Josh Assing" wrote in message
...
I purchased 2 props (both alumininum) to reprop with.
The guy agreed with me that if I hit stuff; it's better to destroy the
prop than
the outsdrive -- but for performance, a ss is the way to go.

he said the weight issue is silly because it's underwater and doesn't
weigh as
much and that no one would use ss if it wore out the outdrive faster.

So -- Here I am; for curiosity sake; asking you if the weight of a ss
prop
really does wear out the drive faster than an aluminum one.

-j





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unlubberizing the Single Screw Inboard, Part II Chuck Gould General 10 October 13th 06 11:36 PM
3 weeks old, and outdrive scuffed, prop nicked Mr Wizzard General 10 July 20th 05 01:35 PM
Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) Steve Cruising 3 May 2nd 05 01:08 AM
Great info piece on towing and tongue weight SenZbar site Steve Schertler Cruising 1 August 18th 04 04:14 AM
Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? Bob General 5 May 18th 04 09:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017