| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The pressure created by the prop pushing the boat is orders of magnitude
greater than anything you could attribute to spinning the weight of the prop. The different between aluminum and ss would not be noticable. "Josh Assing" wrote in message ... I purchased 2 props (both alumininum) to reprop with. The guy agreed with me that if I hit stuff; it's better to destroy the prop than the outsdrive -- but for performance, a ss is the way to go. he said the weight issue is silly because it's underwater and doesn't weigh as much and that no one would use ss if it wore out the outdrive faster. So -- Here I am; for curiosity sake; asking you if the weight of a ss prop really does wear out the drive faster than an aluminum one. -j |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Unlubberizing the Single Screw Inboard, Part II | General | |||
| 3 weeks old, and outdrive scuffed, prop nicked | General | |||
| Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) | Cruising | |||
| Great info piece on towing and tongue weight SenZbar site | Cruising | |||
| Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? | General | |||