On Jun 1, 7:25 am, "NOYB" wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx

The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who
is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any special
interests.

Since "The Environment" allows the human economy to exist, I question
your definition of special interests. Due to mindless population
growth, nature suffers a death of 1,000 cuts each day. Every "petty"
regulation can help offset increasing pressure on waterways.

I question the respect for nature of many (power) boaters. They seem
much more interested in noise and speed than aesthetic values, so
illegal discharges wouldn't be surprising. Par for the course with the
motorsports, F-nature crowd. Dumping in the middle of a lake or river
is easy to get away with, like going in your swim trunks. I say tough
luck if they have to be permitted. It might make them think twice
before casually tainting the water.

Read about the recent Camp Lejeune, NC toxin revelations if you think
everyone takes water quality seriously. This happened for same reason
they have to put No Dumping placards on street drains leading to
rivers.

E.A.

http://enough_already.tripod.com/

Everything you have originates in nature. A little respect is in order.

"Enough Already" wrote in message
s.com...


Read about the recent Camp Lejeune, NC toxin revelations if you think
everyone takes water quality seriously. This happened for same reason
they have to put No Dumping placards on street drains leading to
rivers.


Nice!

"An EPA investigator, Tyler Amon, acknowledged Tuesday that officials had
considered accusing some civilian Navy employees of obstruction of justice.
Amon, who testified despite objections from the Bush administration, said
some employees interviewed during the criminal investigation appeared
coached and were not forthcoming with details.

Rep. Ed Whitfield of Kentucky, the panel's ranking Republican, said he was
puzzled why criminal charges weren't pursued."



The administration was uncomfortable with questions. What a surprise.

"Enough Already" wrote in message
s.com...
Due to mindless population
growth, nature suffers a death of 1,000 cuts each day

Hey, don't blame me. I voted for Bush. He's working hard to eradicate the
world of 1.2 billion Muslims. It's the Democrats who are allowing the
overpopulation to continue.

And if it were up to me, I'd add kayakers and blow-boaters to that list.

I just read some of the links on your website. Don't take this the wrong
way, but YOU'RE ****ING NUTS.

a.. Couples should voluntarily limit their family-size to two or fewer
children, and not just for personal economic reasons. This sort of restraint
goes against natural inclinations but "death control" (modern medicine) must
be matched with birth control for balance to occur. It's a small price to
pay for preserving the future.
a.. The government should eliminate tax breaks for children, either
altogether or after a family already has two kids. Tax breaks encourage
population growth by artificially reducing the cost of having children.
a.. Likewise, welfare subsidies that increase with family size should be
dropped as soon as possible. A family cap law in New Jersey has shown good
results.
a.. Pregnant teenagers should be denied all government assistance unless
they identify the fathers and are subject to the same standards of parental
competency as adoptive parents.
a.. Like it or not, abortion prevents millions of unwanted births each year,
and is such a widely used (albeit unpleasant) form of birth control that it
must be kept legal forever. Well-meaning people who recoil at the thought of
a dead fetus would do well to think about the millions of already-born kids
who die from hunger each year. The real world does not allow for
single-issue panaceas.



"Enough Already" wrote in message
s.com...
On Jun 1, 7:25 am, "NOYB" wrote:

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx

The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else.
Who
is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any
special
interests.

Since "The Environment" allows the human economy to exist, I question
your definition of special interests. Due to mindless population
growth, nature suffers a death of 1,000 cuts each day. Every "petty"
regulation can help offset increasing pressure on waterways.

I question the respect for nature of many (power) boaters. They seem
much more interested in noise and speed than aesthetic values, so
illegal discharges wouldn't be surprising. Par for the course with the
motorsports, F-nature crowd. Dumping in the middle of a lake or river
is easy to get away with, like going in your swim trunks. I say tough
luck if they have to be permitted. It might make them think twice
before casually tainting the water.

Read about the recent Camp Lejeune, NC toxin revelations if you think
everyone takes water quality seriously. This happened for same reason
they have to put No Dumping placards on street drains leading to
rivers.

E.A.

http://enough_already.tripod.com/

Everything you have originates in nature. A little respect is in order.