This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who is
the owner of the foot?

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who is
the owner of the foot?




No details, and who is doing the on-camera interpretation?

"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of the
NMMA.

NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of the
NMMA.




Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the legislative
or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message and who is doing the
on-camera interpretation?

The editor in chief of boattest.com is interviewing the President of the
NMMA.




Thanks. I figured it wasn't anyone who really understood the legislative
or legal systems. It was too Chicken-Little-ish.

Sometimes you have to go a little over the top to get people to act, because
people by nature only react to histrionics.


Just look at the Global Warming hysteria.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who
is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any special
interests.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who
is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any special
interests.


If you sue someone, YOU are the special interest. What's the opposite of "be
beholden"? Make up these ideas themselves?

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else.
Who is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any
special interests.


If you sue someone, YOU are the special interest. What's the opposite of
"be beholden"? Make up these ideas themselves?

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to circumvent
the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to
circumvent the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.


Someone has to keep the sleezy self-serving politicians in check......and
don't say the people will serve justice on the next election.
twiddle dee...twiddle dum.