LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 41
Default Proper interpretation of no-wake rules

Charlie Morgan wrote in
:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:22:21 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:23:08 -0000, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:46:01 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:


What the cops are doing makes perfect sense. The signs say "No Wake
Zone". That means your wake can't enter that zone. It doesn't say
your boat has to be in the zone while making a wake in order for
you to get in trouble.

That would depend on the law as written. I'm thinking the cops are
stretching the law here. Most "no wake zones" are written concerning
the boat. Some examples:

Any vessel operating in a speed zone posted as “Idle Speed - No
Wake� must operate at the minimum speed that will maintain
steerageway. (Florida)

No person shall operate a powercraft within or through a shore zone,
danger zone, or any area marked as a no wake zone at a speed that
produces a wake. (Ohio)

Operate within designated "no wake" area except at headway speed
without creating a swell or wake. (Texas)

When operating your boat in a no-wake zone you must proceed at a
speed at which the vessel does not produce a wake, not to exceed 5
miles per hour. (Alaska)

You'll notice all of the above state the boat be *in* a no wake zone.

I haven't been able to locate the applicable New York law, but I'd
want to see it before paying the ticket.




I agree with your analysis. This will probably fail in court if it
gets that far. They should just move the signs farther out.


I wouldn't count on it. Around here, if you get a ticket, you are
guilty. Much cheaper to suck it up and pay the ticket - or better yet
- be a responsible boater and don't get a ticket. How hard is that?

CWM


Apparently very hard, since according to you, boaters will have to guess
at what the law is, or more correctly, what the cop thinks the law is.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What I find interseting... Scotty ASA 78 November 9th 06 02:12 AM
Rules of the Road: Does anyone care? [email protected] General 13 August 21st 05 12:07 AM
Professional Courtesy and Respect Simple Simon ASA 405 February 11th 04 02:27 AM
COLREGS - The final word on pecking order in restricted visibility. Simple Simon ASA 149 October 22nd 03 04:08 AM
COLREGS - The final word on pecking order in restricted visibility. Simple Simon General 84 October 19th 03 05:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017