| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 08 May 2007 19:48:45 -0400, Wayne.B penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Tue, 08 May 2007 14:00:49 -0400, wrote: Cranes onboard ship -- note for scale that this is a 788 foot long ship. The accident related happened during the ship turning around in the river. It struck a dredge that had anchored outside of the channel. Oooops.... As long as the Plimsoll Lines have not been exceeded the ship was not overloaded. Unlikely that it would have left port if that was the case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plimsoll_line Top heavy? Maybe, but that's a different issue. I'd guess that was carefully calculated in advance. Actually, it was posted kinda tongue in cheek. The cargo wasn't all that heavy (so no issue with the Plimsoll lines), but it sure hung over the sides all over the place... and was likely the cause of grazing the dredge. Another article that I have, but don't have a link to, quotes the crew as saying the weight of the cranes, as distributed, actually made for a more comfortable ride at sea. -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats More likely the dredge was not planned for. When they have brought them into SF Bay for the Oakland terminals, they plan everything. Since they have to go under 2 bridges, the tide is a big calculation. And the CG escorts the boat to keep any other craft clear. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Overloaded ship? You decide..... | General | |||
| The Guardian | ASA | |||
| Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" to Visit USA. | ASA | |||
| Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" TO VISIT USA. | Tall Ships | |||
| Was this Nonantum a Tall Ship? | Tall Ships | |||