Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 01:59:31 -0700, "Paul" wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:26:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: How many of you cruisers carry an automatic defibrillator onboard as part of your emergency medical supplies? I've heard of a few but I'm not yet among them. How much training is required to use them correctly, and how large are they? Virtually no training is actually required, as they "talk" you though using it on someone. It won't shock the person unless it determines it's needed. There is some minor danger if you're touching the person, e.g., you don't listen to the warning to stand clear. You can take a CPR class throught the RX that gives you the certification, but here in Cal (possibly elsewhere) the Good Samaritan laws protect people who use them. I beleive their now about $1500 and not very big at all. So what is the prognosis for the typical defib parient? Prior to last summer's trip from California to Hawaii and back, I discussed heart attack care with a doctor, and he wasn't too optimistic. He told me that unless the patient could receive prompt follow-up treatment, the odds of a successful recovery were pretty bad. Since we were at worst many days away from outside medical help, I didn't pursue the defib unit (and some of the crew were old enough that it might have been warranted). In my volunteer career as a paramedic, I've had around 60 or so cases of cardiac arrest - rougly 40 of them were medical cases involving CPR prior to the resuscitation attempt (I'm doing this from memory). Of those, 4 were successful, but as I remember it, we were there within five minutes of the event and CPR had been initiated immediately. The other 20 or so were trauma related and most of them survived. It's all in the timing. From what I've read, survival over CPR is pretty spectacular and in general the use of auto defibrillators increase the survival rate by about 30% over the old 10%. It's pretty evident that if you can get things going quickly, the chances or survival are good as long as you can also apply oxygen and get the patient to higher level care in good time. I would suspect that for ocean cruisers, it might not be beneficial for somebody in the middle of the Atlantic or Pacific. But for your average cruiser along the coast, medical assistance isn't that far away and could be a big advantage in keeping somebody long enough to be attended to at a higher level. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Friday Ethics Question | General | |||
Winterizing question plus. | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
aid to navigation question | General | |||
Transom Height - Dumb Question Alert | General |