I had a '72 with a 302 2bbl with a C4 trans. Doing 120 on the Interstate
was easy. Cornering with those stupid bias-ply tires was a wild ride.
The time between gas station stops was awfully small.

Tim wrote:
Y'know. I've driven a new mustang,a nd confessedly, I really wasn't
that impressed. I used to have a '72 Boss 429, and I really haven't
seen a Mustang since that could live up to that standard. Of course,
that's my opinion and YMMV.

However! I do still have my '92 Mark VII in the garage under tarp.
Nice 5.0 HO, gobs of torque, and a beautiful ride.

oooooooohhhhhhh!



Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:
snip..
As I duly reported a month or so ago, I took the car for a six hour trip to
North Carolina. The car was the most uncomfortable thing I've ever ridden
in. My hips and legs were screaming, no matter what I did with the seat
adjustments.

I got home on a Saturday, and by the next Saturday it was gone. This was
during the same time that Eisboch got rid of the M5. (Or did you forget
about that also?)
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John
If you had asked, I would have advised that the Mustang is a 'young
person's' car.
Now that I mention it...that's what my next door neighbour said about my
red Ranger Sport truck.. First thing after seeing it he says..."that's
a young man's truck"
I wonder what his point was?