LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
DSK DSK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,419
Default Yo - Doug King..

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I saw a interesting report on CNBC this afternoon by the Cambridge
Energy Research Association which was startling because after some
statistical analysis, they basically said that production in 2005 in
the Lower 48 in the United States was 66 percent higher than Hubbert
projected.


Which is good.

One thing I have suspected for some time is that the
consumption curve for any vital resource tends to skew one
way or the other. It's the supply/demand thing, but not
necessarily dependent on price.

As oil tends get more expensive, people have less tendency
to expend it profligately. This ratchets down the amount
demanded, and X billion barrels last longer. Then there are
other non-economic downward pressure on demand: growing
public awareness that oil won't last forever, some of the
other negative effects (pollution), substitution of
alternatives, constraints on consumption (how many cars can
you drive at once), etc etc. In looking at demand for U.S.
domestic oil, obviously foreign oil will be substitued for
it under many conditions.

So domestic U.S. is not being used up quite as fast as
Hubbert predicted... good news, but not necessarily a sign
that Hubbert was all wrong.

Remember, I'm not one of the doom-n-gloomers predicting the
end of civilization. I *do* think that the era of cheap
energy is over (until we develop fusion). Unfortunately that
also means that the era of ever-cheaper transport is over.

We are on the brink of some new basic economic paradigms...
finally we'll get to see what comes after the Industrial
Revolution.... or can we pick what's behind Door #3?



I don't know - I just want to get moving in the area of biomass fuels,
diesel/electric technologies and passive generation like solar, wave
and wind.


The country that moves it's energy demand OFF oil
consumption will rule the future economically. That's why
the Japanese fusion project(s) worry me more than North
Korean nukes.


If we can get around the NIMBY crowd that is.


Hell, until it's proven better & cleaner in the long run,
I'm a NIMBY myself.

DSK

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sloco & Doug: Dumb and Dumberer Capt. Rob ASA 3 October 16th 06 01:18 AM
Help for Doug Capt. Rob ASA 6 January 5th 06 07:43 PM
Add it up, Doug! Capt. Rob ASA 84 November 15th 05 10:39 AM
Yo - Don White and Doug King... [email protected] General 1 October 18th 05 02:35 AM
Doug King is ignorant. Capt. Neal® ASA 11 March 7th 05 12:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017