"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/8/2006 8:22 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/8/2006 8:13 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/8/2006 7:29 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/8/2006 7:03 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/8/2006 6:42 PM, NOYB wrote:
" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
...
wrote in message
ups.com...
Congratulations to the Dems (I aint no Dem either).
Congratulations?

"Getting people to vote for moderates, in order to put
extremists in power, may be the newest and biggest voter
fraud." --Thomas Sowell
Sowell? Sheesh. A gasbag.
I wish your party well Harry.

Note the baseline you are inheriting: as of today: A 4.4%
unemployment rate (I
believe that is the lowest in over a decade), record stock market
levels,
gasoline around $2/gallon and a booming economy. Most
importantly..........no terrorist attacks on US soil since 9-11.

I hope your party succeeds in improving all of these conditions.
The ball is soon in your court. :-)


Inherited? President Idiot is still in residence at 1600 Penn. When
there's a Dem in there, you can start your clock.
Are you conceding that conditions will worsen with the Dems in power?
Too many variables for your pin job.
So the House and Senate are not responsible for conditions related to
the US unemployment rate, Homeland security and the economy?


What?

Do I need to restate my questions?

We have an executive, a legislative, and a judicial branch of government.
The executive makes the decisions, and can approve or not approve
legislation with a pen, and pay attention to or ignore judicial opinions
with "signing statements" Congress can provide oversight and investigate.


Nice try. A Presidential veto can be overturned by the Congress.

Considering your statement to be correct I guess you saying that the
economy, record stock market levels and unemployment rates during the
Clinton years were the result of the Republican controlled Congress.
Correct?


The US employment rate is a farce; it is padded with "crap" jobs these
days.

Was it also a farce during the Clinton years?