"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:31:24 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
wrote:

Hummmm so guns = steel penis?

Now -that- that Freudian.

"Asch"? Kirst, I suppose, whatever, but it wasn't in your last post, so
don't try to slip it in, or bother referring to it now.

Gosh Mr. ****tard..do you Always sign your informal correspondence
with your full name?

Hmmmm, let me look at the top of the screen.

Yup, for about 21,000 posts now.

Fascinating. Though all readers of my posts over the years know full
well I sign both Gunner and Gunner Asch.

If you want a parallel drawn to Gunner Asch, sign Gunner Asch,
....****tard.

You're nobody in this newsgroup.

Yes..I do have a working and professional knowledge of many types of
arms. I also use the nym Gunner Asch (Herbert) as someone close to my
outlook on the world. Thirdly..Ive been called Gunner for nearly 30
yrs in the real world. Not a nick I picked for myself,..it was
presented to me by those whom I respect. At one time..my working
"nick" was Shiva..but only while working. You remember Shiva dontcha?
That smiling fella out of the Hindu (and others) pantheon.

"Rule #35 That which does not kill you, has made a huge tactical error"
clearly implies involvement with, and the use of, retaliatory deadly
force,
and, it's what you choose from infinity to be recognized by as a
correspondence signature.

So -again- I say, not that we can tell by your chosen screen name or
signature file.


Evidently not. Seems you got virtually everything wrong, except the
cut and pastes. But even you couldnt **** those up too badly.

Perhaps you may find the following sigs more to your liking? Which one
should I keep running for a while:

Talk about ****ing things up- I'm a Joe McCarthy Republican, somewhat to
the right of Genghis Khan politically and militarily.

While I do have Libertarian leanings in personal choice categories, I
don't think the explosives we manufacture should be allowed to cool before
we drop them on someone else's "civilization".

Run along, -boy-, and stick to cut-n-paste.

"[L]iberals are afraid to state what they truly believe in, for to do
so would result in even less votes than they currently receive. Their
methodology is to lie about their real agenda in the hopes of
regaining power, at which point they will do whatever they damn well
please. The problem is they have concealed and obfuscated for so long
that, as a group, they themselves are no longer sure of their goals.
They are a collection of wild-eyed splinter groups, all holding a
grab-bag of dreams and wishes. Some want a Socialist, secular-humanist
state, others the repeal of the Second Amendment. Some want same
sex/different species marriage, others want voting
rights for trees, fish, coal and bugs. Some want cradle to grave care
and complete subservience to the government nanny state, others want a
culture that walks in lockstep and speaks only with intonations of
political correctness. I view the American liberals in much the same
way I view the competing factions of Islamic fundamentalists. The
latter hate each other to the core, and only join
forces to attack the US or Israel. The former hate themselves to the
core, and only join forces to attack George Bush and conservatives."
--Ron Marr


Or perhaps...

--
The other day I was talking with a Democrat friend about the election.
She'd remarked, with equal amounts of sarcasm and good-natured
ribbing, that the GOP had two years to build utopia. I thought about
that later while walking Jasper around the block, and thought, no;
they're not about building utopia. Personally, I'm interested in
keeping other people from building Utopia, because the more your
believe you can create heaven on earth the more likely you are to set
up guillotines in the public square to hasten the process.
- James Lileks

or how about:

"Get ****ed.

/´¯/)
,/¯ /
/ /
/´¯/' '/´¯¯`·¸
/'/ / / /¨¯\
('( ´ ´ ¯~/' ')
\ ' ~ /
'' \ _ ·´
\ (
\ \
Laugh laugh laugh

Gunner