"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

basskisser wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
basskisser wrote:
I see that Chuck has taken it upon himself to appoint himself as
Extreme Ruler and Grand Poobah of rec.boats. Now if anyone attempts
to
post something that he, and he only deems not worthy of his eyes, he
takes it upon himself to change the subject to something stupid. How
does everyone else feel about that? Do you need someone to proofread
your posts, and edit the subject line for you? I don't. I can damned
well choose what I want to read by myself.

You may be smart enough to choose what you want to read, all by
yourself, but you must be too dam* dumb to know how to navigate to the
appropriate newsgroups to post your political nonsense.

There is no ruler or poohbah at rec.boats. This is a group organized so
people can get together on the net and discuss boats, boating, and
boating related topics. Imagine a few guys hanging out at a waterfront
coffee shop to discuss boats. Along comes some jerk who
jumps into the middle of he conversation and says, "Hey, what do you
think about those terrorist-sympathizing, Clinton appointed Democratic
judges?" or "Look what the Idiot In Chief wants to do next in Iraq!"

Some of the guys gathered to discuss boats would be polite enough to
keep their mouths shut and endure the annoying jerk, for at least a
while. Others aren't so polite, or so patient.

Ask yourself this, as you swoon over your self centered reflection in
the nearest available mirror. What is worse? Changing the header on a
single topic, or trying to fu*k up the newsgroup? Despite owning some
little skiff and going fishing once in a while, you seldom express any
interest in boating related topics. You're far more interested in
GD'ing
George Bush and stirring up political nonsense than in talking boats,
so the obvious question is: Why the hell don't you take your political
garbage off to some newsgroup or discussion group organized for that
purpose?

You shouldn't be surprised when boaters get ****ed off at non boaters
trying to turn the boating discussion group into a political campaign
platform. For either side.

But if you keep practicing your outrageous and inconsiderate behavior,
don't be surprised when once in a while one of the boaters calls you to
task for it. A few others who know darn well who they are can expect
the same as well.

So, what's worse? Changing the header on a post or raising your middle
finger to the basic purposes for which a group has gathered and
insisting that you *should* be allowed your daily political rant and
name-calling marathons? You life must be one empty place if you have to
post ridiculously off topic political stuff to a boating NG just to
fill the time.

How does it feel to be the annoyed, instead of the one annoying, for a
change?

I find it amusing how you pick and choose off topic posts to **** on,
Chuck. How come SOME here can post off topic, political flame fests and
you don't do a damned thing about it, then someone else does it, and
you instantly put on your paper hat and play god of rec.boats?


Fair question. There's a difference between general off topic stuff
that appears here, "Oh, crap, my F250 wouldn't start this morning. (or)
You should see the nifty lens I just bought for my camera. (or) My kids
are home visiting from their college in East Overshirt (yawners,
all....sorry) and posting cut and pastes of controversial political
items.

Do you think you're the only person in the group who can read the
papers or form a poliltical opinion? If you are, then why waste that
talent on people who obviously aren't prepared to appreciate it? If you
are not, then why should your particular political opinion be injected
into a discussion group organized to discuss boats and boats every day?

Truth is, Bass, you simply enjoy a good fight. You know that by posting
your anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-conservative values stuff here that you
will draw out the same old half dozen
outraged conservatives to give you one. You can exchange your "I'm not
Kevin, but you are
this or that......" with somebody who you can fantasize might actually
give a rip whether you're Kevin, Doris, Belinda, or Sam.

People who take the attitude "F everybody else, I'm going to do what I
want and pay no attention to whether its appropriate, welcome, in good
taste, or what not" wear on me.
So your daily posting routine of looking for some anti-Bush, anti-war,
anti-conservative values
newspaper clipping to put in a boating newsgroup and then hoping that
somebody engages you in a flame fest wears on me. It probably wears on
me worse because I agree with many of the political positions you claim
to espouse, so your outrageous behavior reflects badly not only on you,
but on anybody who might agree with some of the philosophies you
promote.


Perhaps
you should get off of your high horse. YOU post off topic, also, and
YOU participate in off topic posts. Do you find yourself annoying? As
for your statement that my life must be "one empty place"... YOU used
to be one of the top producers of off topic political posts, was YOUR
life "one empty place"? Further, to take the task of deciding who's off
topic political posts gets past your Grand Poobah eye of approval and
who's doesn't, then writing a 100 line disseration on it would leave
one to believe YOUR life is "one empty place".....


Next time I instigate a political thread from my "high horse" I'll be
just as big an asshole as anybody else starting a political thread in
this group. Please be sure to point out to me when next I decide to cut
and paste controversial and political nonsense here. I'll deserve to be
taken out and strung up by my nads, nailed to a tree.

Do I get on your case a lot for making OT political posts. Yeah.
Suppose that could be because you do it a lot?

You do have a point though. I should be consistent. I'll try not to let
any of your political manure go under the radar in the future.

You also need to tune up your own poobah eye a bit. I tossed a bit of
flak at one of your favorite posters, who is an arch conservative, just
like I did you this morning.

By the way, I can write 100 lines of stuff appropriate for the NG in
about 10 minutes. Don't flatter yourself that I spend any time at it.


Well said and you make good points.

BTW: For the record I don't post OT political that often (yes, I started 4
OT political threads over the last month). The majority of the threads I
start are boating, humor, food or sports related (15 over the past month).
Over the entire summer all the threads I started were on topic or OT non
political. ;-)

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 10/18/2006 5:07 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

. for netcopping.

.. for being a dickweed.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 10/18/2006 5:07 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

. for netcopping.

. for being a dickweed.


You have cooties.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 10/18/2006 5:07 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

. for netcopping.

. for being a dickweed.


You have cooties.


Nah, that was only in grammar school, and the trenchs of WW-1.

"Tom Francis" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:09:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 10/18/2006 5:07 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

. for netcopping.

. for being a dickweed.

You have cooties.

Circle, circle
Dot, dot
Now you have a cootie shot.

Your dog wears army boots and a pink camisole.

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:36:08 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 10/18/2006 7:47 PM, Chuck Gould wrote:

.

Give it up Harry. It's becoming childish.

If not, then you instantly get ****ed on.

No, it's just you, for being suck a pathetic asshole.

Chuck Gould wrote:

Next time I instigate a political thread from my "high horse" I'll be
just as big an asshole as anybody else starting a political thread in
this group. Please be sure to point out to me when next I decide to cut
and paste controversial and political nonsense here. I'll deserve to be
taken out and strung up by my nads, nailed to a tree.



Do I get on your case a lot for making OT political posts. Yeah.
Suppose that could be because you do it a lot?

What about being fair about it then, Chuck? Be an ass to Tom every time
HE posts off topic. It's odd how you pick and choose who to **** on for
posting off topic. JohnH can post off topic all day long, not a word
said by you.

You do have a point though. I should be consistent. I'll try not to let
any of your political manure go under the radar in the future.

What consistent would be, would be if you **** on EVERYONE'S off topic
posts, not just pick and choose.

You also need to tune up your own poobah eye a bit. I tossed a bit of
flak at one of your favorite posters, who is an arch conservative, just
like I did you this morning.

I never said that you chose by political persuasion. I don't know how
you choose, I only know that you do. Seems as though your buddies can
post off topic all day long, nothing said.

By the way, I can write 100 lines of stuff appropriate for the NG in
about 10 minutes. Don't flatter yourself that I spend any time at it.

What is appropriate here? What does all of your above ranting have to
do with boats?

Bill Kearney wrote:
If not, then you instantly get ****ed on.

No, it's just you, for being suck a pathetic asshole.

Once again your childish and petty name calling tells alot about what
kind of a non-man you are. Grow up.

Bill Kearney wrote:
If not, then you instantly get ****ed on.

No, it's just you, for being suck a pathetic asshole.

Oh, and the word is SUCH, not suck, was that a Freudian slip on your
part?