BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article. (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/72734-ping-chuck-gould-vhf-article.html)

Don White August 14th 06 04:39 PM

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car
of any type.
;-)

Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very
short-lived.
It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability
to the
consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of
car models and
engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to
qualify as
"stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac
Tempest GTO is
considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle
car". (It's an
interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that
one by the
Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's
the fed had
started imposing emission requirements that lowered
compression ratios and
horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock
"muscle car".

Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements
in engineering
and engine design, there are some current model cars that
can outperform
their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new
Dodge Charger R/T
with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the
high output
440.
Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better.
Same is true of
the limited production version of the new GTO.

So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even
realize it.

Eisboch



I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-)

Grow up and act like a man.

Kevin, you and Don are quickly becoming the primary idiots of the
newsgroup. Neither of you knows when to shut up and let things
just do by.

This is classic!! How funny. Let's see, we've got Bert, who
blindly and
ignorantly calls me Kevin every post, saying that *I* don't know
when
to let things go!!! How stupid can it get, folks?

Kevin, you keep responding to posts that according to you don't
apply to
you. How much more fun can this be?


Are you really so stupid that you can't figure that out? YOU, being
dumb as a post, respond to ME, to my posts, and ignorantly call me
Kevin. Grow up.

Kevin, you need to go out and get a cup of coffee and wake up I
believe you are still asleep or still in a stupor *from you
drinking* and smoking activities on your drive to work.



D'oh! I try to compliment you and you prove me wrong already.
eg "*from you drinking*"



Some months ago, Bert posted that he quit high school to join the
marines.

More recently, Bert posted that he was graduated from high school.


I believe the former, not the latter.




He may have completed some kind of equavilant program while in the
reserve. What else did he have to occupy his time while hiding out
stateside.




But Don, Bert says he is far more successful than everyone else.



He does brag about his income any chance he gets. Maybe his
father-in-law gave him a job... or a company to mis-manage.
or... he could just be full of sh*t and bluffing us.
Who knows...who cares!

Don White August 14th 06 04:48 PM

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 
Chuck Gould wrote:
Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:57:26 -0700, "Danlw"
wrote:



Great article in the August Nor'Westing on radio procedure. I really get
tired of hearing the "Got your ears on" hails along with the "negative
contact, channel clear" waste of bandwidth.

Hope you are correct that boater education will improve that for the willing
to learn.

Regards, Dan



Haven't seen Chuck around lately. Is he on a trip or did he finally just
get sick of all the politics and name-calling?


He bailed out the day before you got back. Said something about being
sick of all the sheriffing in here.



An actual adult would be ashamed, Don.........of such a total
fabrication as well as his or her conduct in subsequent posts in the
thread.

If you want to act out in the NG there's nobody to stop you. None of
the boaters mind, I'm sure, when you guys with personal axes to grind
and nothing on-topic to contribute turn this forum into a playpen for
adolescent mud wrestlers. However, if you feel some compulsion to send
a public nastygram to John H please do so without claiming that I
"bailed out" of the group or claiming that I made a statement that I
never made. If you need to make up tales to accentuate your future
snide remarks, please leave me out of them. Thanks.

(insert he "What about everybody else?".......) "Everybody else"
didn't misrepresent something I said or did as a means to slam another
poster.


Relax Chuck.. Everyone else knew what was going on...JohnH was the only
one led on as he was away when you announced your departure.

basskisser August 14th 06 06:11 PM

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car
of any type.
;-)

Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very
short-lived.
It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability
to the
consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of
car models and
engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to
qualify as
"stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac
Tempest GTO is
considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle
car". (It's an
interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that
one by the
Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's
the fed had
started imposing emission requirements that lowered
compression ratios and
horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock
"muscle car".

Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements
in engineering
and engine design, there are some current model cars that
can outperform
their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new
Dodge Charger R/T
with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the
high output
440.
Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better.
Same is true of
the limited production version of the new GTO.

So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even
realize it.

Eisboch



I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-)

Grow up and act like a man.

Kevin, you and Don are quickly becoming the primary idiots of the
newsgroup. Neither of you knows when to shut up and let things
just do by.

This is classic!! How funny. Let's see, we've got Bert, who
blindly and
ignorantly calls me Kevin every post, saying that *I* don't know
when
to let things go!!! How stupid can it get, folks?

Kevin, you keep responding to posts that according to you don't
apply to
you. How much more fun can this be?


Are you really so stupid that you can't figure that out? YOU, being
dumb as a post, respond to ME, to my posts, and ignorantly call me
Kevin. Grow up.

Kevin, you need to go out and get a cup of coffee and wake up I
believe you are still asleep or still in a stupor *from you
drinking* and smoking activities on your drive to work.



D'oh! I try to compliment you and you prove me wrong already.
eg "*from you drinking*"



Some months ago, Bert posted that he quit high school to join the
marines.

More recently, Bert posted that he was graduated from high school.


I believe the former, not the latter.



He may have completed some kind of equavilant program while in the
reserve. What else did he have to occupy his time while hiding out
stateside.




But Don, Bert says he is far more successful than everyone else.



He does brag about his income any chance he gets. Maybe his
father-in-law gave him a job... or a company to mis-manage.
or... he could just be full of sh*t and bluffing us.
Who knows...who cares!


Nope, Bert's pointed out here that he has to be at work at certain
times, etc. Meaning he's got a nine to five type job. Those who are
actually successful in life often work more than that, but also don't
need to be told when to show up, etc.


basskisser August 14th 06 06:13 PM

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and
petty insults because he has things you don't?

Why don't you just shut up?


No. Jim deserves to get everything he gets. And it will continue until
HE stops.
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.


Oh, well.
Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time, ever)


See above.



Glad you made it to work on Monday morning to spend the day stealing
from your employer again.


You sure are obsessed with worry about someone stealing from their
employer! Is that what you do? I've told you over and over that I'm
self employed, but I'm not sure you're bright enough to read, let alone
figure out how someone can actually make their own decisions.


P. Fritz August 15th 06 03:43 AM

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
Schnapps, is...whiskey???

LOL!


Kevin never has been the brightest bulb in the marquee....check out these
gems
************************************************** **********888
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (basskisser)
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
Date: 16 Apr 2004 11:06:41 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 31
Message-ID:
References:
. net


.net

k.net

hERfc.144783$gA5.1759229@attbi_s03
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.19.114.139
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082138801 4442 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 18:06:41
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:06:41 +0000 (UTC)

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:hERfc.144783$gA5.1759229@attbi_s03...
You forgot to look up the definition of schnapps.


No, I didn't. Please see below. If you have any more questions, please
feel free to ask. No question is too stupid!

From this site:

http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/people/...iskeymore.html

What is whiskey?
Whiskey is a barrel-aged distilled spirit made from grain or malt. It
differs from other types of grain alcohol in that it absorbs colour
and flavour from the barrels during aging,
it retains more flavour from the fermented mash by being distilled at
a lower proof
and being less thoroughly filtered. As a result, it is much more
flavoursome than vodka. Unlike gin and akvavit, it doesn't have other
flavourings added.

And from this website:
http://www.webtender.com/db/ingred/125

Schnapps
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Generic name for a flavorful alcoholic beverage made from grain or
potato spirits, and flavored with various herbs or fruits. Schnapps
can range from sweet, like a liqueur, to dry as an infused vodka.

Denmark and Germany produce the majority of schnapps
************************************************** ****************Path:
archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (basskisser)
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
Date: 23 Apr 2004 04:32:03 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 60
Message-ID:
References:


.net

k.net

hERfc.144783$gA5.1759229@attbi_s03

HsVfc.145623$gA5.1775373@attbi_s03
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.158.9.99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082719924 26512 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2004 11:32:04
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:32:04 +0000 (UTC)

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:HsVfc.145623$gA5.1775373@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,

Do you know how to read? The very first sentence in your definition is:

"Whiskey is a barrel-aged distilled spirit made from grain or malt."

Schnapps is not barrel-aged, and by your own definition is not a Whiskey.


You dumb **** it CONTAINS whiskey......
are you going to comment on the REST of the definitions?

We will ignore the fact that the vast majority of Schnapps is made from
potatoes. While you can use grain alcohol instead, it still does not
qualify as a whiskey, because it is not barrel aged.

Keep up the good work, your record is still intact, wrong again.

PS It does seem like you learn a lot from Harry, I see you even copy his
technique of using sock puppets and having conversations with yourself.

************************************************** ********
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (basskisser)
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
Date: 16 Apr 2004 04:23:39 -0700
Organization:
http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID:
References:
. net

. net


.net

h9Afc.44240$xn4.150318@attbi_s51
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.19.114.139
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082114619 8492 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 11:23:39
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:23:39 +0000 (UTC)

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:h9Afc.44240$xn4.150318@attbi_s51...
Schnapps is not whiskey, and it can be very expensive.


Yes it IS made from grain alcohol, or WHISKEY. What is confusing you
is your desire to sound like you know what you're talking about, when
in fact you don't.
Get a dictionary.
************************************************** ***************
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (basskisser)
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
Date: 16 Apr 2004 04:21:48 -0700
Organization:
http://groups.google.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID:
References:
. net

. net


.net

.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.19.114.139
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082114508 8425 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 11:21:48
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:21:48 +0000 (UTC)

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

news:1Gffc.10180
Don, be nice to Henry, he's just an old drunkard, and his mind has
been eaten up by cheap whiskey long ago.

Post proof he drinks cheap whiskey.


Okay!

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message


Well you have ice fishing. I really enjoyed doing that in Canada
some

years
back. Nothing like a nice shanty, a tip-up and a pint of Peppermint
Schapps....



No proof yet. Schapps is not whiskey, and may not be cheap. Next try at
a
proof?


First place, it's Schnapps, both you, and Henry spelled it wrong.
Second, Schnapps IS made from grain alcohol, or....whiskey.
************************************************** ****************
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (basskisser)
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
Date: 16 Apr 2004 11:09:27 -0700
Organization:
http://groups.google.com
Lines: 39
Message-ID:
References:
. net


.net

.net


NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.19.114.139
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1082138967 4740 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2004 18:09:27
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:09:27 +0000 (UTC)

"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

news:1Gffc.10180
Don, be nice to Henry, he's just an old drunkard, and his mind
has
been eaten up by cheap whiskey long ago.

Post proof he drinks cheap whiskey.

Okay!

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message


Well you have ice fishing. I really enjoyed doing that in Canada

some
years
back. Nothing like a nice shanty, a tip-up and a pint of

Peppermint
Schapps....


No proof yet. Schapps is not whiskey, and may not be cheap. Next try

at a
proof?


First place, it's Schnapps, both you, and Henry spelled it wrong.
Second, Schnapps IS made from grain alcohol, or....whiskey.


So what? That does not mean it is whiskey. Apple pie is made with flour.
Is apple pie therefore flour?


No, but it would mean that when you were eating apple pie, that you
would, in fact be eating flour. If you were drinking Schnapps, you'd
be drinking whiskey.
************************************************** ********************


P. Fritz wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
basskisser wrote:
John Wentworth wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message Why don't you just
shut
up?
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first
time,
ever)
Don't you understand that these BS posts are the reason they are
here?
They
are people without a life, and this NG serves as a surrogate. If you
are
posting here dozens of time per day, how much real life can you have?

Plenty. For people that can put together complete sentences, have the
ability to think, and can type, it takes very little time at all.


What does "shut to **** up" mean Kevin? You spewed this forth upon the
group yesterday and you have not clarified what you were trying to
communicate.


What do you expect from someone that thinks schnapps is whiskey?






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com