Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

On 14 Aug 2006 04:05:01 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Eisboch wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and
petty insults because he has things you don't?


Why don't you just shut up?

No. Jim deserves to get everything he gets. And it will continue until
HE stops.

This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

Oh, well.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time, ever)

See above.

Your comments may be true, but your persistence is becoming assinine.
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

basskisser wrote:
John Wentworth wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message Why don't you just shut up?
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time,
ever)
Don't you understand that these BS posts are the reason they are here? They
are people without a life, and this NG serves as a surrogate. If you are
posting here dozens of time per day, how much real life can you have?

Plenty. For people that can put together complete sentences, have the
ability to think, and can type, it takes very little time at all.


What does "shut to **** up" mean Kevin? You spewed this forth upon the
group yesterday and you have not clarified what you were trying to
communicate.

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of any type.
;-)

Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very short-lived.
It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability to the
consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of car models and
engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to qualify as
"stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac Tempest GTO is
considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle car". (It's an
interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that one by the
Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's the fed had
started imposing emission requirements that lowered compression ratios and
horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock "muscle car".

Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements in engineering
and engine design, there are some current model cars that can outperform
their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new Dodge Charger R/T
with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the high output
440.
Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better. Same is true of
the limited production version of the new GTO.

So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even realize it.

Eisboch



I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-)
Grow up and act like a man.

Kevin, you and Don are quickly becoming the primary idiots of the
newsgroup. Neither of you knows when to shut up and let things just do by.
This is classic!! How funny. Let's see, we've got Bert, who blindly and
ignorantly calls me Kevin every post, saying that *I* don't know when
to let things go!!! How stupid can it get, folks?

Kevin, you keep responding to posts that according to you don't apply to
you. How much more fun can this be?

Are you really so stupid that you can't figure that out? YOU, being
dumb as a post, respond to ME, to my posts, and ignorantly call me
Kevin. Grow up.


Kevin, you need to go out and get a cup of coffee and wake up I believe
you are still asleep or still in a stupor from you drinking and smoking
activities on your drive to work.

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and
petty insults because he has things you don't?

Why don't you just shut up?
No. Jim deserves to get everything he gets. And it will continue until
HE stops.
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.
Oh, well.
Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first
time, ever)
See above.



Glad you made it to work on Monday morning to spend the day stealing
from your employer again.



I see you are still stealing the oxygen of worthwhile humanity,
Bertbrain. Do the world a favor and drive yourself into a bridge abutment.

Oh, great Krause please show me the way, for I may get lost.

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
basskisser wrote:
John Wentworth wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message Why don't you just shut
up?
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time,
ever)
Don't you understand that these BS posts are the reason they are here?
They
are people without a life, and this NG serves as a surrogate. If you are
posting here dozens of time per day, how much real life can you have?

Plenty. For people that can put together complete sentences, have the
ability to think, and can type, it takes very little time at all.


What does "shut to **** up" mean Kevin? You spewed this forth upon the
group yesterday and you have not clarified what you were trying to
communicate.


What do you expect from someone that thinks schnapps is whiskey?

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Schnapps, is...whiskey???

LOL!



P. Fritz wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
basskisser wrote:
John Wentworth wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message Why don't you just shut
up?
This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first time,
ever)
Don't you understand that these BS posts are the reason they are here?
They
are people without a life, and this NG serves as a surrogate. If you are
posting here dozens of time per day, how much real life can you have?

Plenty. For people that can put together complete sentences, have the
ability to think, and can type, it takes very little time at all.


What does "shut to **** up" mean Kevin? You spewed this forth upon the
group yesterday and you have not clarified what you were trying to
communicate.


What do you expect from someone that thinks schnapps is whiskey?

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Eisboch wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Jim, what happened to you calling him all kinds of childish names and
petty insults because he has things you don't?

Why don't you just shut up?


No. Jim deserves to get everything he gets. And it will continue until
HE stops.

This is getting old and I, for one, am getting tired of it.


Oh, well.

Eisboch (getting very tempted to use the killfile for the first
time, ever)


See above.



Glad you made it to work on Monday morning to spend the day stealing
from your employer again.


Nice to see you clean & sober this morning Bertram. You actually
completed a sentence without a mistake. ( not counting the lying) Keep
up the good work.

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of
any type.
;-)

Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very
short-lived.
It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability to the
consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of car
models and
engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to qualify as
"stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac Tempest
GTO is
considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle car".
(It's an
interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that one
by the
Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's the
fed had
started imposing emission requirements that lowered compression
ratios and
horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock "muscle car".

Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements in
engineering
and engine design, there are some current model cars that can
outperform
their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new Dodge
Charger R/T
with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the
high output
440.
Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better. Same
is true of
the limited production version of the new GTO.

So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even realize it.

Eisboch



I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-)

Grow up and act like a man.

Kevin, you and Don are quickly becoming the primary idiots of the
newsgroup. Neither of you knows when to shut up and let things just
do by.

This is classic!! How funny. Let's see, we've got Bert, who blindly and
ignorantly calls me Kevin every post, saying that *I* don't know when
to let things go!!! How stupid can it get, folks?

Kevin, you keep responding to posts that according to you don't apply to
you. How much more fun can this be?


Are you really so stupid that you can't figure that out? YOU, being
dumb as a post, respond to ME, to my posts, and ignorantly call me
Kevin. Grow up.


Kevin, you need to go out and get a cup of coffee and wake up I believe
you are still asleep or still in a stupor *from you drinking* and smoking
activities on your drive to work.


D'oh! I try to compliment you and you prove me wrong already.
eg "*from you drinking*"

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Yep. And that is the reason I will not buy a muscle car of
any type.
;-)

Funny that you say that. The true "muscle car" era was very
short-lived.
It's origins was in the early 60's with limited availability
to the
consumer - manufacturers had to build a minimum number of car
models and
engines (427 Ford, 426 hemi Chrysler) engines a year to
qualify as
"stock" for NASCAR racing purposes. The 1964 Pontiac Tempest
GTO is
considered by many to be the first mass produced "muscle
car". (It's an
interesting story how how John DeLoreon managed sneak that one
by the
Board of Directors at Pontiac). But, by the end of the 60's
the fed had
started imposing emission requirements that lowered
compression ratios and
horsepower. By 1972 there was no longer a true stock "muscle
car".

Now, within the past 5 years or so and due to advancements in
engineering
and engine design, there are some current model cars that can
outperform
their 1960 something counterparts. For example, the new Dodge
Charger R/T
with the mini-hemi is faster than a '69 Charger R/T with the
high output
440.
Not by much ... but it's faster and handles much better. Same
is true of
the limited production version of the new GTO.

So .... you may be driving a muscle car and not even realize it.

Eisboch



I can burn rubber with my 6 cylinder 2005 Mercury Sable. ;-)

Grow up and act like a man.

Kevin, you and Don are quickly becoming the primary idiots of the
newsgroup. Neither of you knows when to shut up and let things
just do by.

This is classic!! How funny. Let's see, we've got Bert, who
blindly and
ignorantly calls me Kevin every post, saying that *I* don't know when
to let things go!!! How stupid can it get, folks?

Kevin, you keep responding to posts that according to you don't
apply to
you. How much more fun can this be?


Are you really so stupid that you can't figure that out? YOU, being
dumb as a post, respond to ME, to my posts, and ignorantly call me
Kevin. Grow up.

Kevin, you need to go out and get a cup of coffee and wake up I
believe you are still asleep or still in a stupor *from you drinking*
and smoking activities on your drive to work.



D'oh! I try to compliment you and you prove me wrong already.
eg "*from you drinking*"



Some months ago, Bert posted that he quit high school to join the marines.

More recently, Bert posted that he was graduated from high school.


I believe the former, not the latter.


He may have completed some kind of equavilant program while in the
reserve. What else did he have to occupy his time while hiding out
stateside.

Ping-- Chuck Gould--VHF Article.
 

Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:57:26 -0700, "Danlw"
wrote:


Great article in the August Nor'Westing on radio procedure. I really get
tired of hearing the "Got your ears on" hails along with the "negative
contact, channel clear" waste of bandwidth.

Hope you are correct that boater education will improve that for the willing
to learn.

Regards, Dan



Haven't seen Chuck around lately. Is he on a trip or did he finally just
get sick of all the politics and name-calling?

He bailed out the day before you got back. Said something about being
sick of all the sheriffing in here.

An actual adult would be ashamed, Don.........of such a total
fabrication as well as his or her conduct in subsequent posts in the
thread.

If you want to act out in the NG there's nobody to stop you. None of
the boaters mind, I'm sure, when you guys with personal axes to grind
and nothing on-topic to contribute turn this forum into a playpen for
adolescent mud wrestlers. However, if you feel some compulsion to send
a public nastygram to John H please do so without claiming that I
"bailed out" of the group or claiming that I made a statement that I
never made. If you need to make up tales to accentuate your future
snide remarks, please leave me out of them. Thanks.

(insert he "What about everybody else?".......) "Everybody else"
didn't misrepresent something I said or did as a means to slam another
poster.