Harry Krause wrote:
JimH wrote:
Reginal P. Smithers III wrote:
JimH wrote:

I will make this perfectly clear one more time. Do not email me. I
asked you not to do it twice before and you continue.

Talk about not being able to read and understand. Keerist!

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Got it?
---------------------------
for what it is worth, if you want JohnH to Leave you alone, you may
find it best not to Ping him.

Perhaps I should have said "NOW leave me alone" after my attempt to
have a friendly discussion with the ass.

The statement also referred to asking him once again to stop emailing
me, something I have asked him to stop doing 2 times prior. For some
reason you removed that first paragraph of mine in your
reply..........I restored in my reply back to you.

Why did you remove it Reggie?



You *still* haven't figured "Reggie" out? :)
Harry,
You peaked my interest and I went back to see what was said that I
deleted: it was : " I will make this perfectly clear one more time. Do
not email me. I
asked you not to do it twice before and you continue.

Talk about not being able to read and understand. Keerist!

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Got it?"
----------------------------

As I said, I gave JimH very good information about Verizon and I gave
him very good information about not pinging JohnH, I really don't see
how my comment can be considered in a negative manner no matter how his
post is edited. If JimH or anyone else took offense to my suggestion I
would like to offer my sincere apology, life is way to short to get
upset about little things.

Reginal P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
JimH wrote:
Reginal P. Smithers III wrote:
JimH wrote:

I will make this perfectly clear one more time. Do not email me. I
asked you not to do it twice before and you continue.

Talk about not being able to read and understand. Keerist!

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Got it?
---------------------------
for what it is worth, if you want JohnH to Leave you alone, you may
find it best not to Ping him.

Perhaps I should have said "NOW leave me alone" after my attempt to
have a friendly discussion with the ass.

The statement also referred to asking him once again to stop emailing
me, something I have asked him to stop doing 2 times prior. For some
reason you removed that first paragraph of mine in your
reply..........I restored in my reply back to you.

Why did you remove it Reggie?



You *still* haven't figured "Reggie" out? :)
Harry,
You peaked my interest and I went back to see what was said that I
deleted: it was : " I will make this perfectly clear one more time. Do
not email me. I
asked you not to do it twice before and you continue.

Talk about not being able to read and understand. Keerist!

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Got it?"
----------------------------

As I said, I gave JimH very good information about Verizon and I gave
him very good information about not pinging JohnH, I really don't see
how my comment can be considered in a negative manner no matter how his
post is edited. If JimH or anyone else took offense to my suggestion I
would like to offer my sincere apology, life is way to short to get
upset about little things.

I was not addressing your advice Reggie. If you recall, I thanked you
for that.

I was also not upset. I simply asked you a question of why you remove
a key paragraph from my post, taking subsequent remarks in that post
out of context.

Please do not make this molehill into a mountain Reggie nor try to turn
this around. I was quite clear in my comment and question to you.

I accept your apology.

..