"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:26:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Harry *does* have a point about the price/politics connection, Chuck. I
keep
asking a question that the 54% are uncomfortable with, and do not
answer.
But, you, of all people, should be able to answer it.

==========

He did answer it, told you it was off topic in a boating group, and he
is correct.

Current high prices are a political failure of the 70s and 80s,
nothing recent. The supply side is realtively fixed for any given
price point, opportunities are on the demand side.


Here...grab this rope before you sink any further in the mud, Wayne.

Do you listen to the news at all? Think of the last 100 times you've
heard about price increases for a barrel of oil during the last 24
months. Now, forget the reports you heard when hurricanes were a threat.
That leaves 90% of the reports. A hurricane around oil rigs is a valid
reason for price jitters.

Now, for the remaining 90%, what's the reason mentioned almost 100% of
the time?

According to the NY Times, Washington Post, CBS, etc.? Or according to
those without a political axe to grind?

Hopefully, Wayne will respond on his own. For you:

"Oil prices jumped $2.00 a barrel today, on fears surrounding new violence
in XYZ country"

Explain the bias in that statement.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

I, for one, am looking forward to a
greater number of boating related posts from down Naples way.

When I'm boating and fishing, I spend less time here talking about
boating and fishing. But red tide is pretty thick here right now, so
expect more frequent posts...but don't hold your breath that they're all
about boating.

I figured you were busy trying to figure out how to help your president
out of the strategic corner he painted himself into.

You caught me. But now that he's out (45% approval rating according to
Rasmussen), I'm baaaaaaaaaaaccccckkk. ;-)

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:26:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Harry *does* have a point about the price/politics connection, Chuck. I
keep
asking a question that the 54% are uncomfortable with, and do not
answer.
But, you, of all people, should be able to answer it.

==========

He did answer it, told you it was off topic in a boating group, and he
is correct.

Current high prices are a political failure of the 70s and 80s,
nothing recent. The supply side is realtively fixed for any given
price point, opportunities are on the demand side.


Here...grab this rope before you sink any further in the mud, Wayne.

Do you listen to the news at all? Think of the last 100 times you've
heard about price increases for a barrel of oil during the last 24
months. Now, forget the reports you heard when hurricanes were a threat.
That leaves 90% of the reports. A hurricane around oil rigs is a valid
reason for price jitters.

Now, for the remaining 90%, what's the reason mentioned almost 100% of
the time?

According to the NY Times, Washington Post, CBS, etc.? Or according to
those without a political axe to grind?

Hopefully, Wayne will respond on his own. For you:

"Oil prices jumped $2.00 a barrel today, on fears surrounding new violence
in XYZ country"

Explain the bias in that statement.

Bias? None. But there's plenty of opinion in it.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:26:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Harry *does* have a point about the price/politics connection, Chuck.
I keep
asking a question that the 54% are uncomfortable with, and do not
answer.
But, you, of all people, should be able to answer it.

==========

He did answer it, told you it was off topic in a boating group, and he
is correct.

Current high prices are a political failure of the 70s and 80s,
nothing recent. The supply side is realtively fixed for any given
price point, opportunities are on the demand side.


Here...grab this rope before you sink any further in the mud, Wayne.

Do you listen to the news at all? Think of the last 100 times you've
heard about price increases for a barrel of oil during the last 24
months. Now, forget the reports you heard when hurricanes were a
threat. That leaves 90% of the reports. A hurricane around oil rigs is
a valid reason for price jitters.

Now, for the remaining 90%, what's the reason mentioned almost 100% of
the time?

According to the NY Times, Washington Post, CBS, etc.? Or according to
those without a political axe to grind?

Hopefully, Wayne will respond on his own. For you:

"Oil prices jumped $2.00 a barrel today, on fears surrounding new
violence in XYZ country"

Explain the bias in that statement.

Bias? None. But there's plenty of opinion in it.

I agree. Whose opinion would you say it is?

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:05:05 +0000, NOYB wrote:


In the last couple of months, I've caught a couple of personal bests: a
35lb. bull dolphin, a 30 lb. kingfish, and a 9 foot nurse shark.

I've never been fortunate enough to catch a dolphin. I've heard

basskisser wrote:

To what end?? Holy Mackerel! JimH comes here and stirs so much ****
for so long of a time that he turned EVERYBODY against him. Then he
comes back and acts like a nice little puppy who has never done
anything wrong, and abmonishes anybody who even dares to post something
off topic or inflammatory. He needs to clean up his own yard before
bitching about somebody else's. And it appears that you're eating it up
like chum!


Calm down pointy head.

JimH is *our* new Skipper. Stay tuned for his 'Sea of Cortez' report.

-- Charlie

"Charlie" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

To what end?? Holy Mackerel! JimH comes here and stirs so much ****
for so long of a time that he turned EVERYBODY against him. Then he
comes back and acts like a nice little puppy who has never done
anything wrong, and abmonishes anybody who even dares to post something
off topic or inflammatory. He needs to clean up his own yard before
bitching about somebody else's. And it appears that you're eating it up
like chum!


Calm down pointy head.

JimH is *our* new Skipper. Stay tuned for his 'Sea of Cortez' report.

-- Charlie
This doesn't sound like the Charlie I know, but if Chester's means anything
to you, E-mail me
Jim

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Charlie" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

To what end?? Holy Mackerel! JimH comes here and stirs so much ****
for so long of a time that he turned EVERYBODY against him. Then he
comes back and acts like a nice little puppy who has never done
anything wrong, and abmonishes anybody who even dares to post something
off topic or inflammatory. He needs to clean up his own yard before
bitching about somebody else's. And it appears that you're eating it up
like chum!


Calm down pointy head.

JimH is *our* new Skipper. Stay tuned for his 'Sea of Cortez' report.

-- Charlie
This doesn't sound like the Charlie I know, but if Chester's means
anything to you, E-mail me
Jim


Don't think it's the same Charlie.

Eisboch

(on the boat, new refrig installed, beer cooling down, awaiting tropical
storm Beryl)

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Charlie" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

To what end?? Holy Mackerel! JimH comes here and stirs so much ****
for so long of a time that he turned EVERYBODY against him. Then he
comes back and acts like a nice little puppy who has never done
anything wrong, and abmonishes anybody who even dares to post something
off topic or inflammatory. He needs to clean up his own yard before
bitching about somebody else's. And it appears that you're eating it up
like chum!


Calm down pointy head.

JimH is *our* new Skipper. Stay tuned for his 'Sea of Cortez' report.

-- Charlie
This doesn't sound like the Charlie I know, but if Chester's means
anything to you, E-mail me
Jim


Don't think it's the same Charlie.

Eisboch

(on the boat, new refrig installed, beer cooling down, awaiting tropical
storm Beryl)

WHO?

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:26:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Harry *does* have a point about the price/politics connection, Chuck.
I keep
asking a question that the 54% are uncomfortable with, and do not
answer.
But, you, of all people, should be able to answer it.

==========

He did answer it, told you it was off topic in a boating group, and
he
is correct.

Current high prices are a political failure of the 70s and 80s,
nothing recent. The supply side is realtively fixed for any given
price point, opportunities are on the demand side.


Here...grab this rope before you sink any further in the mud, Wayne.

Do you listen to the news at all? Think of the last 100 times you've
heard about price increases for a barrel of oil during the last 24
months. Now, forget the reports you heard when hurricanes were a
threat. That leaves 90% of the reports. A hurricane around oil rigs is
a valid reason for price jitters.

Now, for the remaining 90%, what's the reason mentioned almost 100% of
the time?

According to the NY Times, Washington Post, CBS, etc.? Or according to
those without a political axe to grind?

Hopefully, Wayne will respond on his own. For you:

"Oil prices jumped $2.00 a barrel today, on fears surrounding new
violence in XYZ country"

Explain the bias in that statement.

Bias? None. But there's plenty of opinion in it.

I agree. Whose opinion would you say it is?

Probably some options trader who's long in oil contracts.