Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case.

You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity
causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on
Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and
can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat.

And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those
things. Because they're all lies.

The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance.

"Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its".
Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"?
Wait, you probably do.

We're here, how could we not have an impact.

Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants?
Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the
planet!

Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!

Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private
forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes
are paid by private forest owners.

Cite?

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case.
You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity
causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the
warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly
be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of
heat.

And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those
things. Because they're all lies.

The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance.
"Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and
"its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and
"your's"? Wait, you probably do.

We're here, how could we not have an impact.
Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about
elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're
destroying the planet!

Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!
Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones.
Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And
property taxes are paid by private forest owners.
Cite?

YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link
between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole.

He, Kevin, has taken on JoeSpareBedroom's, aka Doug Kanter, tactic of
askig for a cite and badgering to get his questions answered. When in
reality this is a newsgroup and nobody has to answer anybody's questions.

basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case.
You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity
causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the
warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly
be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of
heat.

And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those
things. Because they're all lies.

The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance.
"Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and
"its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and
"your's"? Wait, you probably do.

We're here, how could we not have an impact.
Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about
elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're
destroying the planet!

Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!
Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones.
Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And
property taxes are paid by private forest owners.
Cite?
YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link
between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole.

First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty
insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you
realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead
of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap.
How childish can you get?


Stop whining and act like a man.

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case.
You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity
causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the
warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly
be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of
heat.

And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those
things. Because they're all lies.

The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance.
"Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and
"its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and
"your's"? Wait, you probably do.

We're here, how could we not have an impact.
Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about
elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're
destroying the planet!

Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!
Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones.
Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And
property taxes are paid by private forest owners.
Cite?
YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link
between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole.
First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty
insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you
realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead
of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap.
How childish can you get?

Stop whining and act like a man.

Grow up. If you knew how to read and comprehend, you'd see there is no
whining in my above STATEMENTS. Just the facts.


What facts? I don't see any facts from you. All you ever do is bless us
with your opinion, Kevin.

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case.
You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity
causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the
warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly
be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of
heat.

And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those
things. Because they're all lies.

The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance.
"Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and
"its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and
"your's"? Wait, you probably do.

We're here, how could we not have an impact.
Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about
elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're
destroying the planet!

Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!
Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones.
Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And
property taxes are paid by private forest owners.
Cite?
YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link
between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole.
First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty
insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you
realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead
of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap.
How childish can you get?

Stop whining and act like a man.

Grow up. If you knew how to read and comprehend, you'd see there is no
whining in my above STATEMENTS. Just the facts.


What facts? I don't see any facts from you. All you ever do is bless us
with your opinion, Kevin.

Fact: I'm not Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or are you
chicken ****?
Fact: I gave several cites about man made global warming.
Fact: Alotta did, indeed, resort to childish and petty name calling
when unable to come up with a single cite to back up the wild claim.
Fact: You are a childish acting boor, and are scared to take the $5000
challenge to prove I'm not Kevin. Just plain scared.