On 13 Jul 2006 09:28:57 -0700, wrote:

Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread.

A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then
here comes a comment about the "righties"

The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all,
until the thread was quickly being turned into one.

Why couldn't it have been left for what it was?

A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery
Channel?

Amen!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

JohnH wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 09:28:57 -0700, wrote:

Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread.

A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then
here comes a comment about the "righties"

The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all,
until the thread was quickly being turned into one.

Why couldn't it have been left for what it was?

A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery
Channel?

Amen!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

Check the left wing sites, please. You will find that they are equally
absurd. (one is the Amercan Socialist Party, fer cry sakes)

The intent of the post was to provide equal relocation assistance to
lost trolls of all stripes.

On 13 Jul 2006 13:46:26 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 09:28:57 -0700, wrote:

Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread.

A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then
here comes a comment about the "righties"

The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all,
until the thread was quickly being turned into one.

Why couldn't it have been left for what it was?

A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery
Channel?

Amen!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

Check the left wing sites, please. You will find that they are equally
absurd. (one is the Amercan Socialist Party, fer cry sakes)

The intent of the post was to provide equal relocation assistance to
lost trolls of all stripes.

I just looked at the titles. No harm, no foul.
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

JohnH wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


? wrote:
....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel,
Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT.

Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous
thread below.

Bishoop....

The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand
than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to.

What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past
week you've accused 'the righties' of something.
--

Don't go JimH on me. MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case. Just look at the
thread on global warming here, and you can instantly tell who is hard
core right wing, and who is either left or center. The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!

wrote:
huh?

Having trouble reading?

On 13 Jul 2006 14:31:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


? wrote:
....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel,
Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT.

Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous
thread below.

Bishoop....

The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand
than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to.

What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past
week you've accused 'the righties' of something.
--

Don't go JimH on me. MOST of the right wing choose to believe right
wing views over good, honest science in this case. Just look at the
thread on global warming here, and you can instantly tell who is hard
core right wing, and who is either left or center. The belief that man
has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is
pure ignorance. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Same thing
with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees!

My advice is this: Stay away from political threads. Don't generalize. Stop
using the inclusive term 'righties' to express your views about individuals
with whom you choose to argue.

You have no idea how many 'righties', if any, believe that man has NO
impact on global warming. Anyone who has ever struck a match has had an
impact on global warming!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


? wrote:
....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel,
Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT.

Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous
thread below.

Bishoop....

The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand
than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to.

It's more like following the party line for the "warmers".

Any scientist who actually has studied the issue says it's bull****.

Really?

Union of Concerned Scientists:
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...gerprints.html
States in part:
In its 2001 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
stated, "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming
observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities."
[3] Carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and land clearing has been
accumulating in the atmosphere, where it acts like a blanket keeping
Earth warm and heating up the surface, ocean, and atmosphere. As a
result, current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher
than at any time during the last 650,000 years. [4,5,6]

NASA scientists rip Bush on Global Warming (and the typical head in the
sand)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6341451/
Which states in part:
Hansen said the scientific community generally agrees that temperatures
on Earth are rising because of the greenhouse effect - increased
emissions of carbon dioxide and other materials into the atmosphere
that trap heat. Most of that increase comes from burning fossil fuels.

Theres many, many more. As a matter of fact, most scientists who have
spoken about Al Gore's movie says he's spot on in a lot of cases, and
not far from spot on the rest of the movie.

I'd suppose you only consider "any scientist who has actually studied
the issue" just the one's who have a right wing agenda, correct?

No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political
thread?



basskisser wrote:
wrote:
huh?

Having trouble reading?

Chuck Gould wrote:
? wrote:
....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel,
Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT.

Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous
thread below.

Bishoop....

Recommended sites for right wing political trolls:

http://www.kkk.bz/
http://www.americannaziparty.com/
https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0
http://www.whitehouse.gov/
http://www.patrobertson.com/
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
http://www.hannity.com/


Recommended sites for left wing political trolls:

http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/
http://sp-usa.org/principles.html
http://www.votehillary.org/
http://www.dnc.org/
http://www.michaelmoore.com/
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/
http://www.aclu.org/



Chuck's true colors come shinning through by his own words and actions.
Do you still believe that you are neutral?

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political
thread?


Because the right wing made it a political issue.


Thanks a good excuse Kevin, not a reason, but an excuse.

When you stand before the judge and say that you are not guilty of the
crime because someone else grew the pot and you only smoked it he is
going to laugh as he throws you in jail.