wrote:
I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up,..."

And so aren't the idiots who insist I'm Kevin.

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.
If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the
challenge? Put up, or shut up.

You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia.
Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of
ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance?

If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do
protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until
you prove otherwise.

I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as
that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you
because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't
comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never
"respond" to you again.


Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job
with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until
the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing
from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot
to do it?

Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull.

My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've
posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall
we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up.
My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be
waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do
you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts.

Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?
Yes.
In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.


Pot is racist?


Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.

Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.

What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.
If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the
challenge? Put up, or shut up.

You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia.
Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of
ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance?

If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do
protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until
you prove otherwise.
I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as
that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you
because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't
comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never
"respond" to you again.

Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job
with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until
the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing
from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot
to do it?

Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull.

My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've
posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall
we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up.
My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be
waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do
you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts.

Put up $5000 and I'll provide the proof.

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?
Yes.
In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.

Pot is racist?

Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.
Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.

What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


"little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you,
Kevin.

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.
If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the
challenge? Put up, or shut up.

You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia.
Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of
ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance?

If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do
protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until
you prove otherwise.
I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as
that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you
because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't
comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never
"respond" to you again.

Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job
with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until
the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing
from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot
to do it?

Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull.

My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've
posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall
we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up.
My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be
waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do
you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts.


Unlike you, Kevin, I have to go to work now. So, while you and Doug
Kanter are posting to USENET while you are "working" I'll actually be
working. I'll check the group around 9:00 PM or later today.

wrote in message
oups.com...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
What's a pothead? Your definition, please.

Watch it man, now you're starting to sound like ****Basser.....


It's a trick. Watch and laugh.


I am watching, and yes, I am laughing...


Burt's going to say that a pothead is someone who uses pot, regardless of
the amount or frequency of use. Then, I'll tell him that anyone who uses
alcohol is an alcoholic, unable to function productively. This will be fun.

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?
Yes.
In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.

Pot is racist?

Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.
Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.

What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


"little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you,
Kevin.

Care to take the $5000 challenge? Put up, or shut up.

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
If Mars and the Earth are warming and cooling on the same cycle then it
would lead anyone with any intelligence to conclude that forces outside
of the two planets are the cause of the warming and cooling.
So, like Mr Question Mark and his twin, you also believe that our human
activities have ZERO EFFECT on global warming. Right?
What percentage of global warming on earth do you attribute to the human
effect? Also, what percentage of global warming on Mars do you attribute
to human effect?
I've read this several times, and yet, and do not see an answer to the
simple question I asked you. One last time. I'll put some more space before
the question so it's easy for you to see.
Why do you want others to answer your questions when you won't answer
their questions?

Do you believe that the human contribution to global warming is ZERO?
I believe that the effect that humans have on global warming is
statistically insignificant. If I had to put a percentage on it it would
be 0.0000000000001%
Please show evidence of that number. And if you can cite any scientific
data that backs that number up, then show how that would or would not
be significant.

You couldn't comprehend the explanation because it is bigger than all of
us. As I said before, there are forces greater than man at work and the
effects of those forces can be seen on other heavenly bodies but, you
are blind to them.
If you are so sure I'm Kevin, you'd have no risk. Care to take the
challenge? Put up, or shut up.

You are Kevin Noble, the pot growing and pot smoking idiot from Georgia.
Put up or shut up, little boy. Please show what evidence you have of
ANY of the above. Or are you just saying that out of pure ignorance?

If you are not Kevin Noble I would expect you to ignore me but, you do
protest too much so, I will continue to assume you are Kevin Noble until
you prove otherwise.
I'll prove otherwise, put up the $5000! Put up, or shut up, simple as
that. If you had any sense at all, you'd realize that I respond to you
because you answer MY posts.....Jeez. Don't answer my posts, don't
comment about my posts, don't mention anything to me, and I'd never
"respond" to you again.

Kevin, I don't want to spoil your fun. You are lucky to still have a job
with the amount of posting you from the time you arrive at work until
the time you depart from work. Does your boss know that you are stealing
from him? Do you smoke pot at work or do you go out into the parking lot
to do it?

Your chain is easy to pull, very easy to pull.

My God you're an idiot. Please prove ANY of the above blather you've
posted about me. Can you? Now, let's take the $5000 challenge, shall
we? What's the matter, are you scared, little one? Put up or shut up.
My boss (me) knows what I do at any given time, by the way. I'll be
waiting for your evidence to any of the above. :You don't have any, do
you? You've once again proven yourself to be ignorant of any facts.


Unlike you, Kevin, I have to go to work now. So, while you and Doug
Kanter are posting to USENET while you are "working" I'll actually be
working. I'll check the group around 9:00 PM or later today.

You can just say that you are ignorant of any facts relating to what
you are blathering about above. Everyone here knows.

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?

Yes.

In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians
thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your
lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach,
esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's
earliest
days.


Pot is racist?


Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the
government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to
madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to
ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote
that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.

Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.


What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


"little one" that hurts so much coming from a mean nasty prick like you,
Kevin.


Calling names again Bert?
Too bad the local sheriff seems to favour the Dark Side!