Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message om... ? wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... When you give me your evidence backing up YOUR statements that: 1. Global warming is "all mother nature (not humans) It is IMPOSSIBLE for our activities to NOT have an effect on global warming. Anyone who wasn't picking their nose all through high school physics is aware of this fact. Please quantify the HUMAN effect. He can't quantify the human effect becasue there is not informaiton from observation to forum a consensus on the human effect of the global warming equation. This discussion is not about HOW MUCH effect. It's about a simple idea: Do we have any effect greater than none, or not. We have to conduct this discussion in baby steps, for reasons obvious to everyone except those who require the baby steps. The effect that we, the human race, have upon earth's global warming is statistically insignificant, when compared to other forces at play in the whole global warming of planets issue. Proof? Let's see those university studies that prove the above sentence. The fact that you attribute so much effect to humans shows that rather than having your finger up your nose in high school physics class you instead had your head up your ass. Petty and childish name calling and silly insults certainly clears up the issue, huh? The KING has spoken. Thanks, Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge to prove I'm not Kevin? Put up or shut up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's the difference between auto a marine cylinder heads? | General | |||
U.S. spy satellites aid Hurricane Katrina recovery | Cruising | |||
It depends on who you feed. | General | |||
OT--The French...again! | General |