On 27 Jun 2006 07:01:30 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:31:40 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:20:21 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...


You two netcops should get a room and entertain yourselves with your
silliness.

Been boating yet this year, John?

BTW, what is it about anti-name calling or anti-troll posts that bothers
you?
--
John H


I'm consistent, John. I don't like unctuousness, a quality you, Gould,
Smithers, et al, have in abundance. I've posted this before. That's for
starters.

Second, you're a facilitator of bad behavior here. Several have pointed
that out. Your constant response of "Who, me?" is recognized for the
bull**** it is.

Third, you're not clever enough with words to play Zoltan Karpathy, John,
so your oiling and oozing your way around here only makes you
look...silly.


I score that reply a clear knock out.

It figures that you'd enjoy the insults and name calling.

In the words of a better man than he, JimH has calibrated himself. Nothing
more need be said.
--
John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2006 07:01:30 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:31:40 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:20:21 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...


You two netcops should get a room and entertain yourselves with your
silliness.

Been boating yet this year, John?

BTW, what is it about anti-name calling or anti-troll posts that
bothers
you?
--
John H


I'm consistent, John. I don't like unctuousness, a quality you, Gould,
Smithers, et al, have in abundance. I've posted this before. That's
for
starters.

Second, you're a facilitator of bad behavior here. Several have
pointed
that out. Your constant response of "Who, me?" is recognized for the
bull**** it is.

Third, you're not clever enough with words to play Zoltan Karpathy,
John,
so your oiling and oozing your way around here only makes you
look...silly.


I score that reply a clear knock out.

It figures that you'd enjoy the insults and name calling.

In the words of a better man than he, JimH has calibrated himself. Nothing
more need be said.
--
John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


You and Kevin are absolutely fixated on me. The is your second post today
and the second post with me as the subject. Am I in your dreams also John?

JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 27 Jun 2006 07:01:30 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:31:40 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:20:21 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...


You two netcops should get a room and entertain yourselves with your
silliness.

Been boating yet this year, John?

BTW, what is it about anti-name calling or anti-troll posts that
bothers
you?
--
John H


I'm consistent, John. I don't like unctuousness, a quality you, Gould,
Smithers, et al, have in abundance. I've posted this before. That's
for
starters.

Second, you're a facilitator of bad behavior here. Several have
pointed
that out. Your constant response of "Who, me?" is recognized for the
bull**** it is.

Third, you're not clever enough with words to play Zoltan Karpathy,
John,
so your oiling and oozing your way around here only makes you
look...silly.


I score that reply a clear knock out.

It figures that you'd enjoy the insults and name calling.

In the words of a better man than he, JimH has calibrated himself. Nothing
more need be said.
--
John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


You and Kevin are absolutely fixated on me. This is your second post today
and the second post with me as the subject. Am I in your dreams also John?


Not a good day. Yet another edit. sigh