John Gaquin wrote:
Oh my -- must everything be explained to you two in chapter and verse?

Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required. Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't clam
chowda. Period.

Really? What do you have that states such? Who ever told you that
chowder can't have tomato in it? This is what dictionary.com has on the
subject:

chow·der ( P ) Pronunciation Key (choudr)
n.
A thick soup containing fish or shellfish, especially clams, and
vegetables, such as potatoes and onions, in a milk or tomato base.
A soup similar to this seafood dish: corn chowder.

Notice is says right there "milk OR TOMATO base"????

From Merriam Webster:

Main Entry: 2chowder
Function: noun
Etymology: French chaudière kettle, contents of a kettle, from Late
Latin caldaria -- more at CAULDRON
: a soup or stew of seafood (as clams or fish) usually made with milk
or tomatoes, salt pork, onions, and other vegetables (as potatoes);
also : a soup resembling chowder


Notice is says right there "milk OR TOMATO base"????


Typical flim-flam wherein New Yorkers, frantically casting about for any
little thing that they could put forth as having made their high-density,
relentlessly frenetic lives seem a bit more enviable and sophisticated, took
something that had already enjoyed centuries of success and acceptance in
its own right, and claim to have made it their own by *******izing it beyond
all recognition. :-)

Please show me any research that states that a chowder can not contain
tomatoes.....

Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

John Gaquin wrote:
Oh my -- must everything be explained to you two in chapter and verse?

Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required. Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't clam
chowda. Period.

Really? What do you have that states such? Who ever told you that
chowder can't have tomato in it? This is what dictionary.com has on the
subject:

chow·der ( P ) Pronunciation Key (choudr)
n.
A thick soup containing fish or shellfish, especially clams, and
vegetables, such as potatoes and onions, in a milk or tomato base.
A soup similar to this seafood dish: corn chowder.

Notice is says right there "milk OR TOMATO base"????

From Merriam Webster:

Main Entry: 2chowder
Function: noun
Etymology: French chaudière kettle, contents of a kettle, from Late
Latin caldaria -- more at CAULDRON
: a soup or stew of seafood (as clams or fish) usually made with milk
or tomatoes, salt pork, onions, and other vegetables (as potatoes);
also : a soup resembling chowder


Notice is says right there "milk OR TOMATO base"????


Typical flim-flam wherein New Yorkers, frantically casting about for any
little thing that they could put forth as having made their high-density,
relentlessly frenetic lives seem a bit more enviable and sophisticated,
took
something that had already enjoyed centuries of success and acceptance in
its own right, and claim to have made it their own by *******izing it
beyond
all recognition. :-)

Please show me any research that states that a chowder can not contain
tomatoes.....

" JimH" jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message
. ..
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Nah....it's a slow day today. We're gonna argue about this all day.

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?


Give it up Kevin. I can certainly post your recent "gems"
also..........they far outshine mine. ;-)

So be my guest if you wish.

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?


Give it up Kevin. I can certainly post your recent "gems"
also..........they far outshine mine. ;-)

So be my guest if you wish.

As suspected of you Jim. You are such a childish boor. Whenever I take
you to the mat, instead of acting like an adult you instantly resort to
calling me Kevin. I'll ask again, would you like to take the $5000
challenge to prove to you that I'm not Kevin? Huh, what was that,
Dennis?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have
anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?


Give it up Kevin. I can certainly post your recent "gems"
also..........they far outshine mine. ;-)

So be my guest if you wish.

As suspected of you Jim. You are such a childish boor. Whenever I take
you to the mat, instead of acting like an adult you instantly resort to
calling me Kevin. I'll ask again, would you like to take the $5000
challenge to prove to you that I'm not Kevin? Huh, what was that,
Dennis?


No thanks Kevin.

" JimH" jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message
. ..

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have
anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?


Give it up Kevin. I can certainly post your recent "gems"
also..........they far outshine mine. ;-)

So be my guest if you wish.

As suspected of you Jim. You are such a childish boor. Whenever I take
you to the mat, instead of acting like an adult you instantly resort to
calling me Kevin. I'll ask again, would you like to take the $5000
challenge to prove to you that I'm not Kevin? Huh, what was that,
Dennis?


No thanks Kevin.



You love to complain about messages that clutter the newsgroup. But, since
you jumped into THIS thread, you have contributed absolutely NOTHING of
value. So, how about you shut the **** up and go away?

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?

So be my guest if you wish.

Okay....remember, you've alienated yourself from every single person
here, Jim. No one wants anything to do with you because of your bipolar
rants.

JimH wrote:
For someone who claims to have me killfiled my name keeps coming up in
just
about everyone of your posts.

You are indeed obsessed with me.


Speaking of name calling, I recall a full month of you calling Harry an

f*#ker.


Pot kettle black.

JimH wrote:
Do you have anything to offer here besides netcopping, negative posts
and
recipe postings John?
(I especially like these where you accuse others of netcopping,
something you do with almost every post)

JimH wrote:
I gave Kevin a pass on that idiotic post. I guess I was in a generous
mood.

JimH wrote:
Sorry to say this Kevin, but you really are an asshole.

Go start a fight with someone else.........better yet..........just go
away.
This was an enjoyable thread till you showed up.

JimH wrote:
He is just trolling for a fight with someone BG........or to be more
blunt,
he is once again acting like a real asshole today. ;-)

JimH wrote:
Which have been zero...nada.........it seems he is more interested in
posting Martha Stewart recipes here. ;-)

JimH wrote:
Nice troll. Stale bait. Won't bite. Have a great evening John.

BTW: Just a reminder to throw away all your prophylactics after you
use
them the first time. Didn't your Daddy teach you that? ;-)

JimH wrote:
Attend to your anger issues John

JimH wrote:
Don't start with the "who, me?" routine. The OT Global Warming thread
you
started certainly caused post after post of name calling, personal
attacks
and "is so, is not" crap.

As Don said, live by the standards you set here sheriff.


BTW: Have a superfragislicticspectacular evening John. ;-)
(another one where Jim doesn't like to be netcopped, although he
himself does so!)

JimH wrote:
I see you are still obsessed with me Moe.

I see Curly..........where is Larry on this pile on?

JimH wrote:
Drop it Bassy. And stop this stupid exchange with Sean. Both of you
are
looking like idiots

JimH wrote:
Cheap plastic chairs...........cheap plastic table.............cheap
music........cheap............

I can understand how this appealed to you .

JimH wrote:
And in your case.....narcissistic.

Any new pictures of the things you purchased and want to flaunt to the
NG? You know, the "look what I have but you don't" type you normally
post.


Have a super fantasticalictic weekend materialistic boy.;-)

JimH wrote:
Yes Richly, the posts here that are filled with foul language, personal

attacks and anger are all my fault.

BTW: What new worldly possessions did you purchase today? Perhaps
his and
hers palaces? ;-)

JimH wrote:
I could care less about the worldly possessions you purchase and post
pictures of for everyone to see, but I have in fact complimented you on
many
of them.

Having said that, you are, with a doubt, the most materialistic person
I
have ever encountered in my life. Ever.


But hey, if being so materialistic makes you happy............


Have a great evening Richly.

Tell me if you need more to remind you of your alter ego. Do you have a
different name for the other person living in your head?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Another decent thread sent down the toilet. Don't you guys have
anything
better to do than argue over chowder?

Jim, you should be the last person on earth to chastise others about
anything that is said, or written in this newsgroup in regards to a
particular thread. Shall I google you up some of your recent gems?
Also, you do realize you don't have to read them, don't you?

So be my guest if you wish.

Okay....remember, you've alienated yourself from every single person
here, Jim. No one wants anything to do with you because of your bipolar
rants.

Kevin, I would post your recent potty mouth comments but I would offend
others here. In fact the last time I did post them folks here got quite
upset that I did because of the filthy language you used and personal
threats you made to members here..........they saw no reason to have it
rebroadcast.

You have nothing to offer here except trying to pick fights with me day in
and day out. You shall therefore join Doug Kanter and Reggie in my garbage
dumpster. Play nice.

See 'ya!