Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Oh, well- if so it will be easier than ever to "carry" it almost everywhere. How soon will they perfect GPS specifically to help me find my way to the john in the middle of the night? :-) http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/02/f...n100-unveiled/ Maybe one can program in all the donut shops and other "hazards" on this thing. A few years from now, we will only shut off our ipods long enought to talk on our cell phones and we'll all be staring at a screen to help us navigate around the block when the dog needs to take a pee. Remember a few years back when we all thought GPS was so miraculous? When you would ask somebody about their boat, the first (often excited) portion of the answer was, typically, "It's got GPS!!" Things change. Amazing. You have to wonder where we will be with these electronic devices in another 1,5 or 10 years. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " JimH" jimh UNDERSCORE osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message . .. wrote in message ups.com... Oh, well- if so it will be easier than ever to "carry" it almost everywhere. How soon will they perfect GPS specifically to help me find my way to the john in the middle of the night? :-) http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/02/f...n100-unveiled/ Maybe one can program in all the donut shops and other "hazards" on this thing. A few years from now, we will only shut off our ipods long enought to talk on our cell phones and we'll all be staring at a screen to help us navigate around the block when the dog needs to take a pee. Remember a few years back when we all thought GPS was so miraculous? When you would ask somebody about their boat, the first (often excited) portion of the answer was, typically, "It's got GPS!!" Things change. Amazing. You have to wonder where we will be with these electronic devices in another 1,5 or 10 years. One of the reason for the oil and energy shortages. The average home uses 4x the power of 20 years ago. Those nice Plasma TV's on their own consume 4x the energy of a CRT TV. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Calif Bill" wrote in message . net... " JimH" jimh UNDERSCORE osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message . .. wrote in message ups.com... Oh, well- if so it will be easier than ever to "carry" it almost everywhere. How soon will they perfect GPS specifically to help me find my way to the john in the middle of the night? :-) http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/02/f...n100-unveiled/ Maybe one can program in all the donut shops and other "hazards" on this thing. A few years from now, we will only shut off our ipods long enought to talk on our cell phones and we'll all be staring at a screen to help us navigate around the block when the dog needs to take a pee. Remember a few years back when we all thought GPS was so miraculous? When you would ask somebody about their boat, the first (often excited) portion of the answer was, typically, "It's got GPS!!" Things change. Amazing. You have to wonder where we will be with these electronic devices in another 1,5 or 10 years. One of the reason for the oil and energy shortages. The average home uses 4x the power of 20 years ago. Those nice Plasma TV's on their own consume 4x the energy of a CRT TV. Industry, though, is smartening up. More and more of my industrial and commercial customers are replacing old fluorescent or halide lighting with the new T8 and T5 linear fluorescent lighting, saving 30%~40% in lighting energy costs. Quite often it costs a company zero-nada to have these fixtures installed by using contractors who own the fixtures and install them at no cost in exchange for an annual lamp replacement contract. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the reason for the oil and energy shortages. The average home uses
4x the power of 20 years ago. Those nice Plasma TV's on their own consume 4x the energy of a CRT TV. Uh no, generally it's about 2x. But also consider you're not getting a 50" CRT so you're not making a direct comparision. This has little to do with added energy consumption, at least not for oil. That's more attributable to automobile use, not residential energy consumption. So don't spout junk science. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Kearney" wrote in message ... One of the reason for the oil and energy shortages. The average home uses 4x the power of 20 years ago. Those nice Plasma TV's on their own consume 4x the energy of a CRT TV. Uh no, generally it's about 2x. But also consider you're not getting a 50" CRT so you're not making a direct comparision. This has little to do with added energy consumption, at least not for oil. That's more attributable to automobile use, not residential energy consumption. So don't spout junk science. Not junk science. Our cars are more efficient over 10 years ago, but look at the increase in number of cars, amount of plastic packaging, amount of computers, etc. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not junk science. Our cars are more efficient over 10 years ago, but look
at the increase in number of cars, amount of plastic packaging, amount of computers, etc. So cite numbers that back it up. The little bit I've seen over the years clearly shows vehicle consupmtion as the leading consumer of hydrocarbons. By quantity totals as well as percentages of increase. This isn't to say that electronic devices aren't more prevalent or that they can, in some circumstances, consume greater wattage. Just that they're nowhere near the same load as vehicular consumption. That cars are less inefficient that 10 years ago (in and of itself an additionally questionable statement) doesn't begin to put a dent in the MUCH larger conumption they're require. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:04:24 -0400, "Bill Kearney"
wrote: So cite numbers that back it up. The little bit I've seen over the years clearly shows vehicle consupmtion as the leading consumer of hydrocarbons. It's not that hard to do a quick "back of the napkin" analysis: Let's assume the average household owns two cars and drives them 12,000 miles a year each. Further assuming 18 mpg average consumption, that's about 1300 gallons per year for transportation. Let's also assume that the average household uses about 400 kwh per month in electricity for a total of 4800 kwh per year. It takes about 1 gallon of hydrocarbon fuel to generate 16 kwh at the power plant. Since the transmission system is only about 25% efficient however because of line and transformer losses, it really takes about 1 gallon per 4 kwh, for a total of about 1200 gallons per year. Those estimates tend to support the assertion that vehicle consumption uses more fuel, at least at the household level. It will vary widely from family to family however, and the numbers are fairly close to a 50/50 split. I have no idea what typical numbers are at the industrial and commercial level. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:04:24 -0400, "Bill Kearney" wrote: So cite numbers that back it up. The little bit I've seen over the years clearly shows vehicle consupmtion as the leading consumer of hydrocarbons. It's not that hard to do a quick "back of the napkin" analysis: Let's assume the average household owns two cars and drives them 12,000 miles a year each. Further assuming 18 mpg average consumption, that's about 1300 gallons per year for transportation. Let's also assume that the average household uses about 400 kwh per month in electricity for a total of 4800 kwh per year. It takes about 1 gallon of hydrocarbon fuel to generate 16 kwh at the power plant. Since the transmission system is only about 25% efficient however because of line and transformer losses, it really takes about 1 gallon per 4 kwh, for a total of about 1200 gallons per year. Those estimates tend to support the assertion that vehicle consumption uses more fuel, at least at the household level. It will vary widely from family to family however, and the numbers are fairly close to a 50/50 split. I have no idea what typical numbers are at the industrial and commercial level. The transmission system is only 25% efficient? I might believe 25% loss, although even that seems high. -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.” |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Update on the Extreme Makeover | General | |||
Boat Safety - and thread arguments | Cruising | |||
Link to Extreme Makeover item.... | General | |||
Extreme Makeover | General | |||
A jetboat in extreme action | General |