|
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message groups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan Dan, where was I "complaining about brakes" on my Jeep. I choose to keep my vehicle. I love it. You should try a Jeep sometime. I've got a friend who has a '76 CJ he might part with. I've owned two. A '94 Jeep GC Laredo (6 cyl) and a '98 Jeep CG Limited (8 cyl). They were both good vehicles but I prefer my current and last SUV's over both of them. I would rather pay to drive a new vehicle than keep an older car that is far more likely to break down without warning with an expired warranty. |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message groups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan I personally don't need a vehicle as a symbol of my manhood. Two unrelated replies to the same post? Why do you feel like you need to defend yourself, Kevin? My point was relevant. |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
basskisser wrote:
Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan I personally don't need a vehicle as a symbol of my manhood. That's right. I'm keeping my 11 year old mini-van a few more years. I don't worry as much that my son will ding it as I do with my new Ranger pickup. My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. Buying new vehicles and/or trading perfectly good vehicles in are poor economical decisions. There's that "manhood" statement again. You can justify your vehicle purchases any way you want but that isn't going to help you when you lean on that BS. Do you pass judgement on everyone who is driving a newer car than you, Kevin? What do you mean by "I'll bet I'm a lot better off"? That sounds like someone defining their "manhood" in a different way. As far as economics, there are two factors that you should consider: (1) Some people can afford new cars more frequently than others. (2) Others are business owners who can depreciate a vehicle over a short period of time and buy new card more often. Dan |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
basskisser wrote:
Black Dog wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message legroups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan I personally don't need a vehicle as a symbol of my manhood. Me neither! Stella And I'm glad you don't!!!! Spoken (written) like a true child. |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message groups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan I personally don't need a vehicle as a symbol of my manhood. That's right. I'm keeping my 11 year old mini-van a few more years. I don't worry as much that my son will ding it as I do with my new Ranger pickup. My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. I think you just insulted Richly Rich RCE. |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
"Dan Krueger" wrote in message nk.net... basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: SamJenson wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message glegroups.com... I have changed the rear brakes on my Jeep three (3) times. I bought it with 57 miles on it. I know how they were and still are. Next time I'll take a picture to prove to you. I am not talking about anybody else's vehicle, I'm talking about mine. Care to wager? Because the brakes on *your* Jeep are on backwards proves nothing. Either you, or the factory installed them backwards. Yes, I will wager that your brakes are installed incorrectly and we will use the manufacturers service manual as the final word. Once you agree to the bet, we can both post our supporting documentation. The loser sends $500 to JohnH to be donated to the Race for the cure in care in his daughter's name. $500 might be a stretch for someone who is complaining about brakes on an 11 year old vehicle. Dan I personally don't need a vehicle as a symbol of my manhood. That's right. I'm keeping my 11 year old mini-van a few more years. I don't worry as much that my son will ding it as I do with my new Ranger pickup. My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. Buying new vehicles and/or trading perfectly good vehicles in are poor economical decisions. There's that "manhood" statement again. You can justify your vehicle purchases any way you want but that isn't going to help you when you lean on that BS. Do you pass judgement on everyone who is driving a newer car than you, Kevin? It is called jealousy.....kevin displays that a lot. What do you mean by "I'll bet I'm a lot better off"? That sounds like someone defining their "manhood" in a different way. As far as economics, there are two factors that you should consider: (1) Some people can afford new cars more frequently than others. (2) Others are business owners who can depreciate a vehicle over a short period of time and buy new card more often. Kevin is as cluless as ever. There are all kinds of factors that play into the cost of owning / operating a car. Age and mileage play large factors in car value. Depending on how you accrue mileage over time determines the proper economic decision. Dan |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. I think you just insulted Richly Rich RCE. Nope. In addition to new, I also drive a 60 year old car regularly. Must make me very secure in my manhood. Now, you, on the other hand .... RCE |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
"RCE" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. I think you just insulted Richly Rich RCE. Nope. In addition to new, I also drive a 60 year old car regularly. Must make me very secure in my manhood. Now, you, on the other hand .... RCE I am sure you dropped it off immediately to Chip Foose to do a full frame up restoration. After all, one must maintain standards in the Richly Rich household.........eh? ;-) |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
"RCE" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. I think you just insulted Richly Rich RCE. Nope. In addition to new, I also drive a 60 year old car regularly. Must make me very secure in my manhood. Now, you, on the other hand .... RCE JimH is trying to pull you down to his level. Don't let him. |
Jim Hertvic - a liar...
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "RCE" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... My Jeep is a go anywhere, do anything type of vehicle. I still like driving it. I've kept in in good shape, runs like a clock, is very low maintenence. I'll bet I'm a lot better off than a lot of people who think they need to be seen in an expensive new-every-year car because of their lack of manhood. I think you just insulted Richly Rich RCE. Nope. In addition to new, I also drive a 60 year old car regularly. Must make me very secure in my manhood. Now, you, on the other hand .... RCE I am sure you dropped it off immediately to Chip Foose to do a full frame up restoration. After all, one must maintain standards in the Richly Rich household.........eh? ;-) I maintain certain standards, but none that would be of interest to you. RCE |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com