I did not mean to launch a personal atrtack on you, sorry you took it
that way.
You said that people responding to the survey were dysfunctional, I
was just pointing out that perhaps your thinking on the issues is not
quite as functional as you might like to think, (which I admit is sort
of an insult,) but meant more in a debating rather than derogatory
sense since it was you who used the term "dysfunctional Americans" in
the first place.
Peace,
John C.


On Sat, 13 May 2006 20:24:31 -0400, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"John Chaplain" wrote in message

No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

Most of us stopped using personal insult as a standard debating tool
somewhere around the age of 12.

My post made no comment one way or the other regarding the efficacy of the
GWB or Clinton administrations. The sole point was that it is pontless or
misleading to ask simplistic poll questions when the two administrations
operated in such markedly different economic and foreign policy contexts.
Hence, grapefruit or fried clams?