| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#131
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JohnH" wrote in message
... I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? |
|
#132
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 09 May 2006 08:17:44 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Mon, 08 May 2006 19:59:29 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Don White wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: What branch of your military did you serve in? I greased and stroked the big artillery guns...I polished my commanders brass buttons so I could stay close to home and out of danger.. Hold on... that was someone else...not me! Just as I thought. You think so little of what others sacrificed so that you can live your easy life. What did you sacrifice for your stateside service, Bertie? Your virginity? Harry, you are in no position to question *anyone's* sacrifices! You're in no position to know that. Harry, with all your talk of sacrifices and compassion, you can't make a donation to a worthwhile cause, even with an offer of tripling it! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
|
#133
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? It's so typical of your 'debating' technique to completely disregard what was said so you can change a thread in a direction of your choice. If I say, "I like cookies", does that mean I'm violently opposed to the eating of meat and would like to see grackles treated with the same respect given to engineers and doctors? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
|
#134
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? It's so typical of your 'debating' technique to completely disregard what was said so you can change a thread in a direction of your choice. If I say, "I like cookies", does that mean I'm violently opposed to the eating of meat and would like to see grackles treated with the same respect given to engineers and doctors? John H Obviously not, John. It means you like cookies. But, you are apparently unable to explain something which makes no sense to me. How do you teach? |
|
#135
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:47:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? It's so typical of your 'debating' technique to completely disregard what was said so you can change a thread in a direction of your choice. If I say, "I like cookies", does that mean I'm violently opposed to the eating of meat and would like to see grackles treated with the same respect given to engineers and doctors? John H Obviously not, John. It means you like cookies. But, you are apparently unable to explain something which makes no sense to me. How do you teach? Another change of direction? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
|
#136
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:47:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message m... I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? It's so typical of your 'debating' technique to completely disregard what was said so you can change a thread in a direction of your choice. If I say, "I like cookies", does that mean I'm violently opposed to the eating of meat and would like to see grackles treated with the same respect given to engineers and doctors? John H Obviously not, John. It means you like cookies. But, you are apparently unable to explain something which makes no sense to me. How do you teach? Another change of direction? John H No, John. You imply that you'd go to war no matter what the reason, because it's your duty. To me, that implies that a president could say "Portugal needs to be rearranged, just because I say so", and you'd feel it was your duty to go. Do you expect your students to accept things with no explanation? |
|
#137
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote: Harry Krause wrote: What did you sacrifice for your stateside service, Bertie? Your virginity? Doubtful.... heard his S/O complain that he was still holding on for the 'right time'. Like clock work Don. You appeared to miss me......so I aim to please! |
|
#138
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bert Robbins wrote:
Doug Kanter wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: "JIMinFL" wrote in message t... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JIMinFL" wrote in message .net... http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ers040908.html I have a question for you. Is it possible that today, you might know something I don't, and that a year from now, I might also know the same thing? Yes Great! The suits who invented the domino theory knew by the late 1960s that it was nonsense, and that's what the entire war was based on. All presidents are the target of various so-called scholars and shmexperts. Many of us figured out early on that the North Vietnamese were not going to burn their way through the south and invade Australia next. Do you remember this nonsense? You are intellectually dishonest. It appears you ran out of steam without being able to explain that statement. I mad the assumption that you are an educated man and you would understand. However, you have proved to be just an arrogant and argumentative prick again! You still haven't explained what you mean. My qualities bear no relationship to your inability to explain yourself. I've stated facts which history has proven out. If you dispute them, back up your statements. I don't have to explain what I mean, it is clear to those that do not have clouded vision like you do. History is not on your side. From the time Stalin consolidated his power within the USSR the USSR was actively promoting communism all around the world. Finally it took a man, one man, to stand up call the communists what they actually were which put an end to spread of communism. And who was that one man? You know who he was? You could call him 40. Oh. You mean the one who snoozed through meetings with his cabinet and security advisors. That one. Is it better to take little snooze or receive a blow job. I thought Bert was talking about Nancy Reagan. |
|
#139
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jack Goff wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2006 23:05:46 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: Don White wrote: Harry Krause wrote: What did you sacrifice for your stateside service, Bertie? Your virginity? Doubtful.... heard his S/O complain that he was still holding on for the 'right time'. Like clock work Don. I'm thinking Donnie is a coward, a "ran from America" "cry-baby". He seems the type. Don't you have an itchy palm that needs scratching? Please take your unseemly behaviour to the appropriate newsgroup. |
|
#140
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 09 May 2006 13:02:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:47:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:30:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message om... I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. John H Do you realize what you're saying here? That when you vote for a president, you give him complete carte blanche to start a war for any reason at all, and you'll go, no matter what the reason? It's so typical of your 'debating' technique to completely disregard what was said so you can change a thread in a direction of your choice. If I say, "I like cookies", does that mean I'm violently opposed to the eating of meat and would like to see grackles treated with the same respect given to engineers and doctors? John H Obviously not, John. It means you like cookies. But, you are apparently unable to explain something which makes no sense to me. How do you teach? Another change of direction? John H No, John. You imply that you'd go to war no matter what the reason, because it's your duty. To me, that implies that a president could say "Portugal needs to be rearranged, just because I say so", and you'd feel it was your duty to go. Do you expect your students to accept things with no explanation? Doug, your 'debating' style is to take a statement, turn it into some ridiculous 'implication' which suits you, and then charge off with comments and innuendoes. Go back to my cookie comment, and then reread your comments. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OH MY GOSH! UNBELIEVABLE NEWS!! | General | |||