Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:13:05 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.



And the sun revolves around the earth.

And someone moved those WMD's.

Hey, those funny Bert and Harry commercials are back..

Anybody remember them for Piel's beer ?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.



And the sun revolves around the earth.

And someone moved those WMD's.

Did you bother reading the article? Or, did you just let your mouth run at
idiot speed again?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are* contributing
to global warming, and might want to change a few living habits?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are* contributing
to global warming, and might want to change a few living habits?

Shhh. Why encourage non-boaters posting OT, anti-Clinton,
anti-democrat, anti-liberal harangues?
Or, for that matter, anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-conservative harangues?
The group has been pretty boaty lately- why give this OT troll any legs?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing
to global warming, and might want to change a few living habits?

Shhh. Why encourage non-boaters posting OT, anti-Clinton,
anti-democrat, anti-liberal harangues?
Or, for that matter, anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-conservative harangues?
The group has been pretty boaty lately- why give this OT troll any legs?


That's boat-ish, not boaty. And you call your bad self a writer!

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

The constant cycles of cooling and warming has occurred for millions of
years. Why is the fact that we are in a heightened solar flare cycle and
both the Earth and Mars are getting warmer not of interest to you? What
caused the glaciers from the last ice age, over 10,000 years ago to thaw?
What caused those glaciers to form in the first place? Something you global
warming adherents fail to comprehend is that the planet does not exist alone
and that the Sun is an integral part of our existence and has a dramatic
effect on our planet and our own existence.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing
to global warming, and might want to change a few living habits?

Shhh. Why encourage non-boaters posting OT, anti-Clinton,
anti-democrat, anti-liberal harangues?
Or, for that matter, anti-Bush, anti-war, anti-conservative harangues?
The group has been pretty boaty lately- why give this OT troll any legs?


Pssst Chuck, he can't help himself.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


And the sun revolves around the earth.

And someone moved those WMD's.

Did you bother reading the article? Or, did you just let your mouth run
at idiot speed again?




To tell you the truth, Bert, I rarely look into your toilet bowl. I figure
if you posted it, no matter the subject, it absolutely, positively has to
be b.s.

Harry, your warped personality forces you to look into my toilet. You and
your brother Dougie don't have the self control to ignore me. You both have
proven time and time again your lack of self control.

Have a nice day and no need to respond; I'm unlikely to read it.

We will see.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

Really? Whew......how can you type with your head so far in the sand?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

You might be right, or you might be wrong. However, here's an analogy. Your
doctor says you have a brain tumor. You tell him won't believe it's
dangerous until he shows you a petri dish on his desk containing a tumor,
from your head, the size of a bran muffin. Of course, by that time, you'd be
so messed up that you won't be able to comment on what you're seeing.




The constant cycles of cooling and warming has occurred for millions of
years. Why is the fact that we are in a heightened solar flare cycle and
both the Earth and Mars are getting warmer not of interest to you?

Absolutely everything is of interest to me. This is why you and I are so
different.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:09:54 -0400, "Bert Robbins" wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Wrong group.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking of ways
to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You figured this all
out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

You're presuming that such information has been presented. It hasn't.


That's not what I asked, but I'm not surprised you were able to spot that in
what I wrote. Is it true that the retarded don't know they're retarded?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

Really? Whew......how can you type with your head so far in the sand?

Do you have any undisputed facts that contradict the points made in the
article? I would wager your answer is no.

I see you are backsliding Kevin.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in
:


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...ion/2006/04/09
/do0907.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

The constant cycles of cooling and warming has occurred for millions
of years. Why is the fact that we are in a heightened solar flare
cycle and both the Earth and Mars are getting warmer not of interest
to you? What caused the glaciers from the last ice age, over 10,000
years ago to thaw? What caused those glaciers to form in the first
place? Something you global warming adherents fail to comprehend is
that the planet does not exist alone and that the Sun is an integral
part of our existence and has a dramatic effect on our planet and our
own existence.

The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.

And, the biggest example of this is the Kyoto Protocols where wealth
redistribution is the primary goal rather than reduction of global emissions
of CO2 and the other bad chemicals.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

Really? Whew......how can you type with your head so far in the sand?

Do you have any undisputed facts that contradict the points made in the
article? I would wager your answer is no.

And, you have no undisputed facts to prove your thoughts on the issue,
either. Back in your hole.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to
stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking of ways
to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You figured this all
out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices that you
determine are not in your best interests.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Thanks for acknowledging that NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PRESENTED LINKING
HUMAN ACTIVITY TO GLOBAL WARMING.

Are you absolutely, 100% positive about that? Let's say I had a gun to your
head, and a briefcase full of paper. Would you be willing to bet your life
on the contents of the briefcase?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to
stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking of
ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You figured this
all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices that
you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75 messages, I
could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up conclusions like
this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3 or 4. Where did you
come up with the conclusion above, beginning with "You want to control...."
? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote it.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Thanks for acknowledging that NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PRESENTED
LINKING HUMAN ACTIVITY TO GLOBAL WARMING.

Are you absolutely, 100% positive about that? Let's say I had a gun to
your head, and a briefcase full of paper. Would you be willing to bet
your life on the contents of the briefcase?

You don't even have one sentence.


BAM! Time for you to start reading news sources aimed at adults. Hint: Time
Magazine isn't one of those.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Thanks for acknowledging that NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PRESENTED LINKING
HUMAN ACTIVITY TO GLOBAL WARMING.

Are you absolutely, 100% positive about that? Let's say I had a gun to
your head, and a briefcase full of paper. Would you be willing to bet your
life on the contents of the briefcase?

Dougie, you need to take a break and let your head clear. When you can't
argue fact you resort to stupid questions like the one above.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to
stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking of
ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You figured
this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices that
you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75 messages, I
could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up conclusions like
this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3 or 4. Where did you
come up with the conclusion above, beginning with "You want to
control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote it.

Now you want to go back to our discussion where you wanted to determine who
could and who couldn't own a particular vehicle.

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you waist
gasoline instead of money?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you
waist gasoline instead of money?

That's "waste", not "waist", moron. And, I wasn't in the market for a
vehicle. Again, your addled mind has tossed the words into a paper bag,
shaken it, and spilled the contents onto the floor.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Post one sentence. C'mon you little faggot. Show us how smart your momma
made you when you had your head up her skirt after your classmates beat
your snot-nosed little face into a pussified pulp.

Fight the vodka.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you
waist gasoline instead of money?

That's "waste", not "waist", moron. And, I wasn't in the market for a
vehicle. Again, your addled mind has tossed the words into a paper bag,
shaken it, and spilled the contents onto the floor.

Ooooh, the spelling policeman is at it again. You won't win a spelling bee
either, Moron.

So, you agree with me that anyone can buy any vehicle they desire, thanks
for supporting me and my ilk.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

Fred Dehl wrote:

Post one sentence. C'mon you little faggot. Show us how smart your momma
made you when you had your head up her skirt after your classmates beat
your snot-nosed little face into a pussified pulp.

One sentence.

One.

Now.

Here.

Come on faggot.

Show us what you've got in your pants besides air and ****.


Are you always interested in what schoolboys have in their pants?
You should get help before you act on your impulses.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.



And the sun revolves around the earth.

And someone moved those WMD's.

Seriously Harry, it's something to watch and making our energy systems more
efficient (reducing our carbon dioxide output) makes sense on many levels.
The uneducated alarmist can destroy our economy by insisting on unnecessary
restrictions.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there could
never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

No, I read the article...mainly it's a piece that puts PERSPECTIVE on global
temperature fluctuations. And points out that the DOOM proponents of global
warming have a hidden agenda.

The flaw as I see in this article is that the temp is read in England which
has the gulf stream as the major impact on temperatures. Slight
fluctuations in that flow impact England severely and that flow has been
slowing slightly and that might be the reason that temps in England have not
kept up with global temp increases of less than 1 degree over the last 50
years.

Now before you jump on that, much of that increase is caused by the
SUN...it's still an open question how much if any of the increase is caused
by carbon dioxide.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

You might be right, or you might be wrong. However, here's an analogy.
Your doctor says you have a brain tumor. You tell him won't believe it's
dangerous until he shows you a petri dish on his desk containing a tumor,
from your head, the size of a bran muffin. Of course, by that time, you'd
be so messed up that you won't be able to comment on what you're seeing.

No, the analogy should be; You have headaches and one doctor says you have
a brain tumor even though it doesn't show up on a CT scan, "it's too small"
says the doctor "to show up on a scan at this time but it will kill you if
left untreated". You go for a second opinion and that doctor asks about
your lifestyle, does and in-depth study and concludes that it's probably
related to your job as an amusement ride inspector but to be on the safe
side you should get a CT scan every 6 months for 2 years to be sure. You
can't quit your job ( you have a family to support) so you follow the second
doctors advice.

Doug, you call the second doctor a quack when that IS the reasonable choice.
The first doctor MAY be right but the evidence is not all in. There may be
a tumor caused by insult but it's not going to be malignant, it's not going
to grow or metastasize.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

You might be right, or you might be wrong. However, here's an analogy.
Your doctor says you have a brain tumor. You tell him won't believe it's
dangerous until he shows you a petri dish on his desk containing a tumor,
from your head, the size of a bran muffin. Of course, by that time, you'd
be so messed up that you won't be able to comment on what you're seeing.

No, the analogy should be; You have headaches and one doctor says you
have a brain tumor even though it doesn't show up on a CT scan, "it's too
small" says the doctor "to show up on a scan at this time but it will kill
you if left untreated". You go for a second opinion and that doctor asks
about your lifestyle, does and in-depth study and concludes that it's
probably related to your job as an amusement ride inspector but to be on
the safe side you should get a CT scan every 6 months for 2 years to be
sure. You can't quit your job ( you have a family to support) so you
follow the second doctors advice.

Doug, you call the second doctor a quack when that IS the reasonable
choice. The first doctor MAY be right but the evidence is not all in.
There may be a tumor caused by insult but it's not going to be malignant,
it's not going to grow or metastasize.


Interesting analogy, Jeff, but doctor #2 hasn't suggested any behavioral
changes. That would complete the picture.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Nope. You like to pull that standard comment out of your ass whenever it's
convenient. Sadly, it has nothing to do with the subject at hand 99.9% of
the time.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you
waist gasoline instead of money?

That's "waste", not "waist", moron. And, I wasn't in the market for a
vehicle. Again, your addled mind has tossed the words into a paper bag,
shaken it, and spilled the contents onto the floor.

Ooooh, the spelling policeman is at it again. You won't win a spelling bee
either, Moron.

So, you agree with me that anyone can buy any vehicle they desire, thanks
for supporting me and my ilk.



Of course I agree with that, although it's a stupid thing to do. Even if you
do NOT believe in global warming theories, you cannot dispute the fact that
larger engines pollute the air more than smaller ones, assuming both are
properly maintained and other factors are as equal as they can be.

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:04:36 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

Of course I agree with that, although it's a stupid thing to do. Even if
you
do NOT believe in global warming theories, you cannot dispute the fact
that
larger engines pollute the air more than smaller ones, assuming both are
properly maintained and other factors are as equal as they can be.

So freakin' what? Who cares?

The bigger the better - MORE POWER!!!

Smog - that's the answer.


Damn Straight!

That's why I am trading in my small 383 ci for a bigger, 440 ci that burns
more fuel and makes more smog.

RCE

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:04:36 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

Of course I agree with that, although it's a stupid thing to do. Even if
you
do NOT believe in global warming theories, you cannot dispute the fact
that
larger engines pollute the air more than smaller ones, assuming both are
properly maintained and other factors are as equal as they can be.

So freakin' what? Who cares?

The bigger the better - MORE POWER!!!

Smog - that's the answer.

There's that voice again......:-)

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.


Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?

There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.

You might be right, or you might be wrong. However, here's an analogy.
Your doctor says you have a brain tumor. You tell him won't believe it's
dangerous until he shows you a petri dish on his desk containing a
tumor, from your head, the size of a bran muffin. Of course, by that
time, you'd be so messed up that you won't be able to comment on what
you're seeing.

No, the analogy should be; You have headaches and one doctor says you
have a brain tumor even though it doesn't show up on a CT scan, "it's too
small" says the doctor "to show up on a scan at this time but it will
kill you if left untreated". You go for a second opinion and that doctor
asks about your lifestyle, does and in-depth study and concludes that
it's probably related to your job as an amusement ride inspector but to
be on the safe side you should get a CT scan every 6 months for 2 years
to be sure. You can't quit your job ( you have a family to support) so
you follow the second doctors advice.

Doug, you call the second doctor a quack when that IS the reasonable
choice. The first doctor MAY be right but the evidence is not all in.
There may be a tumor caused by insult but it's not going to be malignant,
it's not going to grow or metastasize.


Interesting analogy, Jeff, but doctor #2 hasn't suggested any behavioral
changes. That would complete the picture.

"Behavioral changes?" What behavioral changes can effect the growth of an
existing brain tumor?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Nope. You like to pull that standard comment out of your ass whenever
it's convenient. Sadly, it has nothing to do with the subject at hand
99.9% of the time.

Your ability to argue is inhibited by your constata attempts to aggravate
your opponet by personal attacks. This is evidenced by your "Fight the
vodka" jab, very adult of you don't you think?

Global Warming: It Has Stopped
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jeff Rigby wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is
that global warming stopped in 1998.

Raising hand I have a question! Are you the opinion that there
could never be any information which would convince you that we *are*
contributing to global warming, and might want to change a few living
habits?
There is no information at this time that would convince me that global
warming is a man made phenomena.
You might be right, or you might be wrong. However, here's an analogy.
Your doctor says you have a brain tumor. You tell him won't believe it's
dangerous until he shows you a petri dish on his desk containing a
tumor, from your head, the size of a bran muffin. Of course, by that
time, you'd be so messed up that you won't be able to comment on what
you're seeing.

No, the analogy should be; You have headaches and one doctor says you
have a brain tumor even though it doesn't show up on a CT scan, "it's too
small" says the doctor "to show up on a scan at this time but it will
kill you if left untreated". You go for a second opinion and that doctor
asks about your lifestyle, does and in-depth study and concludes that
it's probably related to your job as an amusement ride inspector but to
be on the safe side you should get a CT scan every 6 months for 2 years
to be sure. You can't quit your job ( you have a family to support) so
you follow the second doctors advice.

Doug, you call the second doctor a quack when that IS the reasonable
choice. The first doctor MAY be right but the evidence is not all in.
There may be a tumor caused by insult but it's not going to be malignant,
it's not going to grow or metastasize.


Interesting, but if certain posters here (and I am not hinting you are one
of those) claimed there was no connection between the activities of man
and global warming, I would dismiss those claims out of hand because of
the demonstrated pigheadedness and stupidity of those posters, and the
fact that they have their heads stuck up the butts of the US Chamber of
Commerce.

Or:

The check is in the mail.

Someone stole those WMDs before we could find them.

The federal government picks up its share of the tab for
No Child Left Behind.

Have a nice day.

Your biased opinion of people clouds your judgement of issues. This is
priceless.