" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Black Dog wrote:
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Black Dog" wrote in message
news
basskisser wrote:

Black Dog wrote:


I have seen almost NO science about climate change. Even in
journals
like Nature, climatology has become polluted by politics.


Perhaps you should read some!


I get Nature's email alerts and abstracts. I would love to "read some"
science - if it was there. Like I said - I see no science, just
politics.


I take it you've read everything ever published on the subject. Right?


Sure, I'm doing my PhD on climate change. No, of course I haven't. But
what I have read (and I am a geologist by training, so I have read a few
excruciatingly boring journals on earth-science type topics) contains
mostly bad science and much more bad politics.

such as? Do you really think that, when a single electric generating
plant spews 13 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere yearly,
compounded by all of the plants in the world, that that can have
nothing but a detrimental affect on the environment???



Just curious...........how does that compare to what Mt. St. Helens spewed
into the atmosphere when it erupted?

How does that compare to the constant volcanic eruptions occurring
throughout the history of the earth, well before man was even here?

I am not trying to argue with you......I would just like to know. ;-)


BTW, your figures are off:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electri...t/co2emiss.pdf