"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Nope. You like to pull that standard comment out of your ass whenever it's
convenient. Sadly, it has nothing to do with the subject at hand 99.9% of
the time.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Nope. You like to pull that standard comment out of your ass whenever
it's convenient. Sadly, it has nothing to do with the subject at hand
99.9% of the time.

Your ability to argue is inhibited by your constata attempts to aggravate
your opponet by personal attacks. This is evidenced by your "Fight the
vodka" jab, very adult of you don't you think?