Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the ficht like"excuses"???)
So essentially the engine failed during the powerboat's report?? & the
bomb people can't even fix it then come back t\with an "excuse" which as usual blames anyone but their lean at power engines. Ask the E-Tec dealers how much agg. of kickbacks are they gathering up to sell these things at well above the prices of proper proven designs from proper proven manufacturers. Don't ever forget the BRP is not some huge high tech French Co in Canada, it's a new wannabe French family owned Co in Canada & you can make your own judgments about the so called warranty & dealer marketing claims. Anyway don't come back Ficht like & try to say you weren't warned. K The Powerboat Reports Controversy The Statement: Powerboat Reports (PBR) is a subscription-based (no advertising) periodical similar to Consumer Reports. They test products impartially and report the results to their subscribers. It's one of our favorite publications. In mid-2005, PBR installed two E-TEC 90s on a Twin Vee catamaran for long term testing (typically around 250 hours). In the first 100 hours, one of the engines developed a rattling noise in the #1 cylinder, but there were no other problems. The other engine was fine. BRP technicians appeared uncertain as to the cause of the problem, so they had the dealer replace the powerhead. But the rattle only grew worse. Eventually, BRP took the boat into their shop to diagnose the problem. They came back in a week with the engine fixed, and claimed that the rattle was the result of fuel starvation in the #1 cylinder caused by a pinched fuel line. They claimed that the fuel line was kinked because Twin Vee used a poor grade of fuel hose when they installed the motor. BRP replaced the fuel hose, and the motor ran fine. PBR and Twin Vee both contested the diagnosis. There was some amount of finger-pointing, and Twin Vee was so upset with the process that they have stated that they will no longer install Evinrude motors on their hulls. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the ficht like "excuses"???)
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:50:07 +1000, "K. Smith" wrote:
So essentially the engine failed during the powerboat's report?? & the bomb people can't even fix it then come back t\with an "excuse" which as usual blames anyone but their lean at power engines. Fer cryzakes Karen, please find another dead horse to beat. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the ficht like "excuses"???)
K. Smith wrote: Eventually, BRP took the boat into their shop to diagnose the problem. They came back in a week with the engine fixed, and claimed that the rattle was the result of fuel starvation in the #1 cylinder caused by a pinched fuel line. They claimed that the fuel line was kinked because Twin Vee used a poor grade of fuel hose when they installed the motor. BRP replaced the fuel hose, and the motor ran fine. May or may not mean anything. What *else* did they do during the week they had the engine besides replace a fuel hose with an internal "pinch"? If anything? It would be easy to do a quick rebuild on the #1 cylinder and then return it with a story that there was a kinked fuel hose. "Look! We replaced the fuel hose ((and secretly rebuilt the cylinder)) and it runs fine!" Or, if they admit rebuilding the cylinder and they blame the cause on a constricted fuel supply line that isn't definitive, either. The rebuilt engine ran fine when initially started up- but did as well for the first umpteen hours on the (allegedly) constricted fuel line. It's probably wrong to insist that skullduggery is the only explanation for the restored performance of the engine after it was returned, but it would be foolish to rule out the possibility entirely. More information needed here. It would be interesting to know whether the engine returned from the repair shop continues to run well, and for how long. It isn't insignificant that of two identical engines only one developed a problem. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the ficht like "excuses"???)
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: The engine was under warranty and was fixed - what's the problem? If they suspected some cylinder damage because of flawed fuel/oil mix, more power to them as a responsible repair shop. How many times have you taken that over engineered Volvo into the shop and had it returned without really knowing what was done? I"d bet more than once. Actually, my car's only been in the shop (for anything beyond oil changes and the first brake job) once in 45,000 miles. An O2 sensor caused the check engine light to come on, and it was replaced under warranty. Of course my V-40 was built in Czechoslovakia, (or somewhere thereabouts), by some Japanese company (Mitsubishi?) in partnership with Volvo rather than in Sweden like most of the other Volvos are- but it has been a very good car for the first three years. If everybody built outboard motors as well as they build good quality cars, we wouldn't be dealing with all this distress. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the fichtlike "excuses"???)
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
E-Tec problems (when they fail they still trot out the fichtlike "excuses"???)
Settle settle, "I" didn't write this, this was a paste from a BRP
supporter!!! I note you've stopped repeating your E-Tec claims of 31ftr cruising at 35 mph on 8-11 USgph?? Good lad, see even you can learn not to tell childlike impossible porkies in the NG. OK OK you can still get away with your endless OT ones but that's because I can't be bothered. As for your hearsay testimonials (for the record, I say all yours are hearsay) well gee that's not unusual. After all these chumps just paid more than the price of a proper proven & tested 4 stroke OB for essentially a still in test design?? So far the only independent tests have shown unreliable (50% failed in the subject test!!), expensive (B&WE by thousands!!), down on power (only independent B&WE test), Heavy (read the specs!!), hugely fuel inefficient (Again B&WE) E-Tec can't have it both ways it's either brand new never before tried & therefore certainly unproven technology from a non engine building family owned Co??? or it's just yet another Ficht upgrade?? Runaway loves to pretend the bigger ones have a track record but then denies any relationship to Ficht?? I feel for you if your recent claim that you've now actually bought one is true, of course if it's just another Krause like lie then; I don't:-) K Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 7 Apr 2006 08:06:00 -0700, " wrote: It's probably wrong to insist that skullduggery is the only explanation for the restored performance of the engine after it was returned, but it would be foolish to rule out the possibility entirely What it is is more hyperbole about nothing. When the stator went south on my Ranger's FICHT, is it relevant that they changed the EMM, wiring harness and two suspect injectors without telling me? No it wasn't. The fact that they did because they suspected that there might be problems in the future said more about them doing the job right - it certainly wasn't skullduggery. I didn't find out until I received the paperwork in the mail two weeks after I picked it up (i picked it up after hours). The engine was under warranty and was fixed - what's the problem? If they suspected some cylinder damage because of flawed fuel/oil mix, more power to them as a responsible repair shop. How many times have you taken that over engineered Volvo into the shop and had it returned without really knowing what was done? I"d bet more than once. It's just more of Dingo Grrrl's habit of throwing her spoor as far as she can in the vain hope of eventually being right about something - anything - at least once. Just to stick some more pins in our Upside Down friend, my buddy who swapped his Optimax's for E-TECs is raving about the change - he can't believe the difference in acceleration and fuel economy. His son is going to be purchasing his Dad's Grady and Ken wants a new one - with E-TECs. Heh, heh, heh... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
E-Tec problems?? well yes if you want the HP you pay for | General | |||
E-Tec problems dealers demand standards; so I'll play | General | |||
E-Tec - Whats your experience? | General | |||
So where is...................... | General |