"Billgran" wrote in message
news

K. Smith wrote:
Paste from an "independent" magazine test.

Not surprisingly given its strong on-water performance, the
Mercury
250XS pulled the most horsepower (252 hp at 5200 rpm). Next was
the
Yamaha (246 hp at 5600 rpm). Evinrude brought up the rear (239 hp
at
5600 rpm).

In terms of torque, the Yamaha 250 HPDI VMax edged Mercury with
268
lb.-ft. at 3800 rpm, vs. the Merc's 267 lb.-ft. at 4400 rpm.
Evinrude came in a distant third, with 250 lb.-ft. at 4000 rpm.

end paste;

Gee those pesky "independent" tests, the dealers must be making
up
the
excuses as we type:-) look at the lack of E-Tec torque!!! Woohoo
this
before your season even starts!!!!

Yes yes I know it's all technically legal, but be aware when the
HP
numbers get big so does that 10% allowance. I assume E-Tec charge
for
a
full 250HP??? Oops silly me now I remember, that's right they're
MORE
expensive than the others.



Hey Karen,

Twice in the above post you mention the lack of E-TEC torque and HP.
If you
would read the magazine article, it is from March of 2003 and they are
comparing the FICHT motor (Evinrude DI), not an E-TEC!!!!! That
is 2
years BEFORE the V-6 E-TEC was put into production.

Talk about "spruiking" in reverse. Bad mouthing an engine and not even
knowing which one is being tested !!!!

Besides that, notice that the magazine comments on how well the FICHT
runs
compared to the others, and that was the one they preferred.

Bill Grannis
service manager

The article from a few months ago that I posted the fuel consumption
figures from was most certainly an etec. You work for the magazine,
right? Their numbers shouldn't be a surprise to you.

I'm not bad mouthing anyone, but some folks are posting like an etec is
some sort of magic motor that gets way better gas mileage than a Optimax
or HPDI or 4Stroke, which doesn't seem to be confirmed by B&WB. Great
magazine, by the way. I read it cover to cover every issue.

del