Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then
when caught, lie?


He had a license, just not a new type stamp.

Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He
poached.


No, the license required to hunt is a hunting license. Extra stamps may be
required, but it is not the hunting license. We have to have a fishing
license. Plus if you fish in San Francisco bay all the way to Redding on
the
Sac River, you are required to have a delta enhancement stamp. You get
caught without one, you do not get a fishing without a license ticket. You
get another type ticket.

Holy Hell!! I really don't care about what you WRONGLY think. Show me
the CA statute that states that if you are caught without the proper
stamp, that it IS NOT hunting without license/permit?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat
on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and
line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't
caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue
he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach,
then
when caught, lie?


He had a license, just not a new type stamp.

Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He
poached.


No, the license required to hunt is a hunting license. Extra stamps may
be
required, but it is not the hunting license. We have to have a fishing
license. Plus if you fish in San Francisco bay all the way to Redding on
the
Sac River, you are required to have a delta enhancement stamp. You get
caught without one, you do not get a fishing without a license ticket.
You
get another type ticket.

Holy Hell!! I really don't care about what you WRONGLY think. Show me
the CA statute that states that if you are caught without the proper
stamp, that it IS NOT hunting without license/permit?


Different fines. No license and the ticket is about $500. A couple of the
judges give the person the choice of the fine or buy a lifetime license.
Wrong, or missing stamp is probably a $100 TICKET.