JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?


Get away with what?

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?


Get away with what?

Try to follow the thread, Jim, okay? Look up 13 lines from here........

On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in to
a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat
on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach,
then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in to
a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Take it to alt.sheriffs.netcopping

JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat
on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach,
then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in to
a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Take it to alt.sheriffs.netcopping

Here we go. Jim's going off the deep end....again....

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it
sat
on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during
hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and
line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't
caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue
he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach,
then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in
to
a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Take it to alt.sheriffs.netcopping

Here we go. Jim's going off the deep end....again....


Really? How so?

On 15 Feb 2006 12:55:54 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat
on
the
blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the
veep's
office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his
hunting
license to shoot quail in Texas.



NOYB wrote:
He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington.


Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting
season,
you darn well better have all the paperwork in order.

It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line,
hook,
bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your
fishing
license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught
nothin'
anyhow."

You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as
long
as
you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook.

If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he
was
hunting for squirrel or other rodents.

So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach,
then
when caught, lie?


It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury.

Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon
millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him?
But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it?

It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in to
a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Take it to alt.sheriffs.netcopping

Here we go. Jim's going off the deep end....again....

Nah, he's just hankerin' for a fight. He won't get it from me, and it's
been buggin' him.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************