|
Support the Danish!
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a
few ways to support the country. First we can write our own Senators and President. President is at www.whitehouse.gov Senators are easy to google. The Danish Embassy is emailable at and the Prime Minister is at In addition, there are multiple web sites with Danish Goods listed. Buy Denmark!! A few sites are http://www.danish.com/ http://www.danishshop.dk/ http://www.danish-deli-food.com/ http://www.scandinavianfoods.com/ The last one is in Chicago on Clark in Andersonville. Then there are all the Danish furniture stores!! And much of our ribs come from Denmark. So let's support the land of Lego, Hans Christian Anderson, and good cheese and furniture |
Support the Danish!
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
... The last one is in Chicago on Clark in Andersonville. Then there are all the Danish furniture stores!! And much of our ribs come from Denmark. So let's support the land of Lego, Hans Christian Anderson, and good cheese and furniture Ribs? The meat? |
Support the Danish!
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message ... The last one is in Chicago on Clark in Andersonville. Then there are all the Danish furniture stores!! And much of our ribs come from Denmark. So let's support the land of Lego, Hans Christian Anderson, and good cheese and furniture Ribs? The meat? I have a danish almost every morning with coffee -- good enough? |
Support the Danish!
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:33:51 -0600, "Dan J.S." wrote:
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. First we can write our own Senators and President. President is at www.whitehouse.gov Senators are easy to google. The Danish Embassy is emailable at and the Prime Minister is at In addition, there are multiple web sites with Danish Goods listed. Buy Denmark!! A few sites are http://www.danish.com/ http://www.danishshop.dk/ http://www.danish-deli-food.com/ http://www.scandinavianfoods.com/ The last one is in Chicago on Clark in Andersonville. Then there are all the Danish furniture stores!! And much of our ribs come from Denmark. So let's support the land of Lego, Hans Christian Anderson, and good cheese and furniture We're now thinking of visiting Denmark this spring when we go to Holland. There is a nice campground just outside Copenhagen, with buses to downtown about every 20 minutes. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Support the Danish!
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:41:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... The last one is in Chicago on Clark in Andersonville. Then there are all the Danish furniture stores!! And much of our ribs come from Denmark. So let's support the land of Lego, Hans Christian Anderson, and good cheese and furniture Ribs? The meat? They eat the meat before they ship the ribs to America and sell the bones for $.99 a pound. Many people buy a box, once. Some are stupid enough to do it more than once. Costco ribs are the best, but they're not cheap either. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Support the Danish!
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. |
Support the Danish!
"Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. |
Support the Danish!
Dan J.S. wrote:
i forgot islam - new religion of liberals ??? How the heck do you get *this* conclusion out of the previous posts? The main problem I see here is 1- a lot of Muslim rabble-rousers are succeeding at preaching hatred & violence, nothing new about that 2- very few (if any) Muslim leaders have realized that the rules of Islam apply only to other Muslims. DSK |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:28:39 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message m... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? i dont know. you said it was a christian newspaper - i havent seen anything that references a christian newspaper. im quite sure i would have noticed it reading about it or it would have been all over the political blogs i read - havent seen one thing about it being a christian newspaper. i did see that it was a small newspaper, but the cartoonists are noted political cartoonists in denmark. i dont know - i was only asking for a reference. ill keep looking for a specific reference to a christian newspaper if you dont have one at the moment. no worries. Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:28:39 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message om... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? i dont know. you said it was a christian newspaper - i havent seen anything that references a christian newspaper. im quite sure i would have noticed it reading about it or it would have been all over the political blogs i read - havent seen one thing about it being a christian newspaper. i did see that it was a small newspaper, but the cartoonists are noted political cartoonists in denmark. i dont know - i was only asking for a reference. ill keep looking for a specific reference to a christian newspaper if you dont have one at the moment. no worries. Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. on google news I did a search for cartoon christian danish and came up with all the stories on the issue, but nothing suggesting the original newspaper was a christian one. I am now looking at what Danish newspapers are christian. I think some liberals are twisting this one. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:28:39 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message om... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? i dont know. you said it was a christian newspaper - i havent seen anything that references a christian newspaper. im quite sure i would have noticed it reading about it or it would have been all over the political blogs i read - havent seen one thing about it being a christian newspaper. i did see that it was a small newspaper, but the cartoonists are noted political cartoonists in denmark. i dont know - i was only asking for a reference. ill keep looking for a specific reference to a christian newspaper if you dont have one at the moment. no worries. Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. Sure it does, and you made it so by making this statement: "A (typically) stupid Christian publication..." You have been asked several times to provide a link or some proof that the publication was a "Christian" publication and all you have done is offered excuses. Now you say it really doesn't matter. Interesting. |
Support the Danish!
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:28:39 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message m... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:fiiiu15fir1tqmtujj2hpgd7m6c1e1vge1@4ax. com... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? i dont know. you said it was a christian newspaper - i havent seen anything that references a christian newspaper. im quite sure i would have noticed it reading about it or it would have been all over the political blogs i read - havent seen one thing about it being a christian newspaper. i did see that it was a small newspaper, but the cartoonists are noted political cartoonists in denmark. i dont know - i was only asking for a reference. ill keep looking for a specific reference to a christian newspaper if you dont have one at the moment. no worries. Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. Sure it does, and you made it so by making this statement: "A (typically) stupid Christian publication..." You have been asked several times to provide a link or some proof that the publication was a "Christian" publication and all you have done is offered excuses. Now you say it really doesn't matter. Interesting. Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:28:39 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message om... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:49:12 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:fiiiu15fir1tqmtujj2hpgd7m6c1e1vge1@4ax .com... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:15:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. nothing ive read about this says that. you got a quote or something? Having a quote requires sitting down for the news. My day primarily runs as follows: If I'm working, I'm working. I'm not reading news online. If I'm paying attention to news, I'm not working. I'm getting it from radio or TV sources. What I said in that post is based on listening to NBC, ABC, Public TV, some BBC (from Canada), etc. If the cartoon had been published in Rolling Stone, nobody on earth, not even Muslim wackos, would've assumed our government supported such things. But, stick it in a publication run by "Christians", and suddenly it has undeserved validity. thats odd - i havent seen any references to a - christian - newspaper. hmmmm.... Who do you think published it? The Danish government? If the NY Times had published it, and it resulted in violence against our embassies, do you seriously believe Bush, Rove, Limbaugh and other government luminaries would be fluffing their feathers and defending the newspaper's views? Seriously? i dont know. you said it was a christian newspaper - i havent seen anything that references a christian newspaper. im quite sure i would have noticed it reading about it or it would have been all over the political blogs i read - havent seen one thing about it being a christian newspaper. i did see that it was a small newspaper, but the cartoonists are noted political cartoonists in denmark. i dont know - i was only asking for a reference. ill keep looking for a specific reference to a christian newspaper if you dont have one at the moment. no worries. Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. Sure it does, and you made it so by making this statement: "A (typically) stupid Christian publication..." You have been asked several times to provide a link or some proof that the publication was a "Christian" publication and all you have done is offered excuses. Now you say it really doesn't matter. Interesting. Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. You made the claim Doug........you do the search and provide the proof. Still waiting........................... |
Support the Danish!
"Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those riots? Yawn..... |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. |
Support the Danish!
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial? |
Support the Danish!
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial? No....don't recall that one. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial service? No....don't recall that one. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLI...orial.fallout/ |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. well, yes it does because if it was a christian newspaper, then that is a whole different story. and i have looked and looked and looked and cant find a reference to a christian newspaper. Tom, if you think I'm inventing this, let me know, and give me a good reason why I'd do so. Unfortunately, money's been tight, so a few months back, I had to fire the secretary who used to follow me around and take notes any time I wanted to track something which might be of interest to this newsgroup. Otherwise, I'd have the precise date & time I heard this, the source, the reporter's name & shoe size, etc. Here's an angle: Can you think of any reasons why news editors & producers might've dropped the "Christian" aspect of this story very quickly? |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. well, yes it does because if it was a christian newspaper, then that is a whole different story. and i have looked and looked and looked and cant find a reference to a christian newspaper. Tom, if you think I'm inventing this, let me know, and give me a good reason why I'd do so. Unfortunately, money's been tight, so a few months back, I had to fire the secretary who used to follow me around and take notes any time I wanted to track something which might be of interest to this newsgroup. Otherwise, I'd have the precise date & time I heard this, the source, the reporter's name & shoe size, etc. Here's an angle: Can you think of any reasons why news editors & producers might've dropped the "Christian" aspect of this story very quickly? You need to start thinking more capitalist and less socialist and money will not be so tight. Show us the proof it was a christian publication. |
Support the Danish!
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those riots? Yawn..... Doug, I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is to promote Christianity? -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
Support the Danish!
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial service? No....don't recall that one. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLI...orial.fallout/ I guess that makes a trend. |
Support the Danish!
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part. Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious. Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial service? No....don't recall that one. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLI...orial.fallout/ I guess that makes a trend. In recent history (2 out of 2)..............yes it does. |
Support the Danish!
"Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. well, yes it does because if it was a christian newspaper, then that is a whole different story. and i have looked and looked and looked and cant find a reference to a christian newspaper. Tom, if you think I'm inventing this, let me know, and give me a good reason why I'd do so. Unfortunately, money's been tight, so a few months back, I had to fire the secretary who used to follow me around and take notes any time I wanted to track something which might be of interest to this newsgroup. Otherwise, I'd have the precise date & time I heard this, the source, the reporter's name & shoe size, etc. Here's an angle: Can you think of any reasons why news editors & producers might've dropped the "Christian" aspect of this story very quickly? You need to start thinking more capitalist and less socialist and money will not be so tight. Show us the proof it was a christian publication. Show me proof I didn't hear it. |
Support the Danish!
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and tell me about your delusion: 1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims. 2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great. 3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION that started the mess? If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support" when its actions generate conflict. Bull****. i forgot islam - new religion of liberals No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions are the same. yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam. How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is the outrage there? Islamists are idiots. Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the situation. Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those riots? Yawn..... Doug, I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is to promote Christianity? Odd question. Statistically speaking, most newspapers in Western countries will fall into your first category, since most Western countries are largely Christian. As far as the second category, such publications *do* exist: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Meanwhile: US, British media tread carefully in cartoon furor Papers have not reprinted Muhammad caricatures, but support right to publish them. By Arthur Bright | csmonitor.com Protests over 12 cartoons of the prophet Muhammad spread across the Muslim world over the weekend, as Danish embassies were set on fire in Syria and Lebanon and at least six people were killed during protests in Afghanistan and Somalia. But while the demonstrations were inflamed at least in part by the cartoons' republishing by newspapers across continental Europe, the media in the United States have largely abstained from representing the cartoons, citing them as "too offensive to run," reports Editor and Publisher. Mo http://www.christiansciencemonitor.c...ate.html?s=rel |
Support the Danish!
Doug Kanter wrote:
Doug, I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is to promote Christianity? Odd question. Statistically speaking, most newspapers in Western countries will fall into your first category, since most Western countries are largely Christian. As far as the second category, such publications *do* exist: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Yes, I know most newspapers run in Western countries fall into the first category, and yes I know there are newspapers that fall into the 2nd category. My question to you was "when you said it a "Christian Newspaper" what category were you using to label the newspaper a "Christian newspaper". -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
Support the Danish!
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message . .. Doug Kanter wrote: Doug, I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is to promote Christianity? Odd question. Statistically speaking, most newspapers in Western countries will fall into your first category, since most Western countries are largely Christian. As far as the second category, such publications *do* exist: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Yes, I know most newspapers run in Western countries fall into the first category, and yes I know there are newspapers that fall into the 2nd category. My question to you was "when you said it a "Christian Newspaper" what category were you using to label the newspaper a "Christian newspaper". I heard "published by a Christian newspaper", or some combination of those words. That's all. Since I do not listen to news sources which employ stupid writers, I am 100% positive they did not mean a newspaper which falls into your first category. |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:34:47 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. well, yes it does because if it was a christian newspaper, then that is a whole different story. and i have looked and looked and looked and cant find a reference to a christian newspaper. Tom, if you think I'm inventing this, let me know, and give me a good reason why I'd do so. Unfortunately, money's been tight, so a few months back, I had to fire the secretary who used to follow me around and take notes any time I wanted to track something which might be of interest to this newsgroup. Otherwise, I'd have the precise date & time I heard this, the source, the reporter's name & shoe size, etc. Here's an angle: Can you think of any reasons why news editors & producers might've dropped the "Christian" aspect of this story very quickly? forget it - as you said - no biggie. I think the non-Danish media are stepping very lightly around this, since the initial incident. You can imagine the results if they did otherwise. |
Support the Danish!
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:41:18 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote:
Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. The original cartoons were published Sept.30 in Jyllands-Posten. I'm not sure, but I don't believe it's a "Christian" newspaper. The following link has the paper's rationale for the cartoons. http://www.jp.dk/udland/tema:fid=11328/ The cartoons: http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/...posten-racism/ Interesting debate, freedom of speech vs. religious sensibilities. To place it closer to home, to those in the freedom of speech camp, did you also support Serrano's freedom to display his **** Christ? http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg...mages/502.html |
Support the Danish!
"thunder" wrote in message
... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:41:18 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote: Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. The original cartoons were published Sept.30 in Jyllands-Posten. I'm not sure, but I don't believe it's a "Christian" newspaper. The following link has the paper's rationale for the cartoons. http://www.jp.dk/udland/tema:fid=11328/ The cartoons: http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/...posten-racism/ Interesting debate, freedom of speech vs. religious sensibilities. To place it closer to home, to those in the freedom of speech camp, did you also support Serrano's freedom to display his **** Christ? http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg...mages/502.html Hadn't seen it. But, there might be a difference. Muslims believe it's a bad thing to portray their god in any way at all. Christians don't have such issues with the mere existence of images of JC. The *nature* of an image of JC is another issue entirely. |
Support the Danish!
thunder wrote:
The original cartoons were published Sept.30 in Jyllands-Posten. I'm not sure, but I don't believe it's a "Christian" newspaper. The following link has the paper's rationale for the cartoons. http://www.jp.dk/udland/tema:fid=11328/ The cartoons: http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/...posten-racism/ Interesting debate, freedom of speech vs. religious sensibilities. To place it closer to home, to those in the freedom of speech camp, did you also support Serrano's freedom to display his **** Christ? http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg...mages/502.html I don't understand why it's a "freedom of speech" issue. It's an issue of Muslim hate-mongers convincing a lot of ignorant peasants that the rules of Islam should somehow apply to Danes also. Do Catholics riot & burn every time somebody tells a joke about the Pope? DSK |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:40:21 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:34:47 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message m... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Really, I don't. Heard it on at least 3 news sources within 48 hours of the initial occurrence. But, it really doesn't matter. well, yes it does because if it was a christian newspaper, then that is a whole different story. and i have looked and looked and looked and cant find a reference to a christian newspaper. Tom, if you think I'm inventing this, let me know, and give me a good reason why I'd do so. Unfortunately, money's been tight, so a few months back, I had to fire the secretary who used to follow me around and take notes any time I wanted to track something which might be of interest to this newsgroup. Otherwise, I'd have the precise date & time I heard this, the source, the reporter's name & shoe size, etc. Here's an angle: Can you think of any reasons why news editors & producers might've dropped the "Christian" aspect of this story very quickly? forget it - as you said - no biggie. I think the non-Danish media are stepping very lightly around this, since the initial incident. You can imagine the results if they did otherwise. my take is that american media wont show the cartoons because they are afraid that their buildings will be burned down, they will be murdered or a combination of the two. Sounds like a good reason. |
Support the Danish
Dan J.S. wrote: After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have found a few ways to support the country. First we can write our own Senators and President. President is at www.whitehouse.gov Senators are easy to google. yada, yada, yada.............. Too late for me to "support" the Danish. I had it with coffee for breakfast. This group is rec.boats, not wrecked votes. Ever occur to you that (at least among folks who go boating) one reason people like to get out on the water is to forget, at least temporarily, about all the bull crap in the world? This is a NG dedicated to discussing that enjoyable recreational activity. There are hundreds of groups out there for talking politics. This was just such a place, until recently, but perhaps you'd consider taking a cue from the current bahavior of the majority (or realize that with the exception of a couple of folks you reeled in with this you're talking to yourself). If you won't or can't discuss boats and boating, would you consider at least leaving the major political and religious crap in another NG? Yeah, we've all got the option not to read your incendiary junk- but its mere presence here tends to attract more of the same. I'm sure there must be some appropriate site where people who want to discuss how "Arabs" are making problems for the Danish can get together and solve the problems of the world. I think I'll go see if the wire racks in my toaster will support another Danish. :-) |
Support the Danish!
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:37:51 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:41:18 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote: Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. The original cartoons were published Sept.30 in Jyllands-Posten. I'm not sure, but I don't believe it's a "Christian" newspaper. The following link has the paper's rationale for the cartoons. http://www.jp.dk/udland/tema:fid=11328/ The cartoons: http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/...posten-racism/ Interesting debate, freedom of speech vs. religious sensibilities. To place it closer to home, to those in the freedom of speech camp, did you also support Serrano's freedom to display his **** Christ? http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg...mages/502.html Hadn't seen it. But, there might be a difference. Muslims believe it's a bad thing to portray their god in any way at all. Christians don't have such issues with the mere existence of images of JC. The *nature* of an image of JC is another issue entirely. but equaly offensive wouldn't you say? Might depend on where it was published. How "in your face" was it? If Robert Mapplethorpe's work had been in the editorial section of a newspaper, I would've been outraged (as a parent). But, his work was interesting, and he had every right to show it in venues where people knew what they were getting into beforehand. Frankly, I didn't find the **** Christ image such a big deal. Without the title, it looked like just another heavily affected image. |
Support the Danish!
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:41:18 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote: Go do a search at www.npr.org. That's usually the first radio station I tune to in the car. Next would be our local right-wing Clear Channel disaster, WHAM. The original cartoons were published Sept.30 in Jyllands-Posten. I'm not sure, but I don't believe it's a "Christian" newspaper. The following link has the paper's rationale for the cartoons. http://www.jp.dk/udland/tema:fid=11328/ The cartoons: http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/...posten-racism/ Interesting debate, freedom of speech vs. religious sensibilities. To place it closer to home, to those in the freedom of speech camp, did you also support Serrano's freedom to display his **** Christ? http://www.usc.edu/schools/annenberg...mages/502.html This is an interesting comparison between the "**** Christ" and Islamic censorship. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=21171 -- Reggie ************************************************** ************* That's my story and I am sticking to it. ************************************************** ************* |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com