Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:34:59 -0700, "jps" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:12:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Doug, the question referred to the fact that people are spending more money, not where they are spending it. How can you assert that when the news simply reflected Walmart and not the general state of discount retailers? How are Walmart's competition doing? If they're doing well, then you may have a case. If not, money may simply be shifting from one retail outfit to another, potentially based on price. See, there's more of the conservative vs. liberal thinking. Our lot is willing to be patient and make a judgement when all the data is in. You folks want to make a case on one month, one day, one report. Sorry bud, that dog won't hunt. Gosh, jps, I'd have expected you to do this: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Economy shows further signs of recovering By Patrice Hill THE WASHINGTON TIMES More signs that the economy is gathering strength emerged yesterday as big retailers like Wal-Mart reported their best sales in a year while productivity boomed and unemployment claims dropped for a third straight week. The increase in same-store sales last month, at 4.3 percent, was nearly double the pace set in May and June in a survey of big department stores by the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. Wal-Mart, the biggest retailer, said better-than-expected sales were partly the result of tax rebate checks. With consumer momentum building, the retailer boosted its profit outlook for the rest of the year. "It was a good month, and it may be a good omen for the second half," said Michael P. Niemira, vice president of the Tokyo bank. Although warm weather and heavy discounting by retailers accounted for some of the gains, "this could be the start of a much better trend," he said. Some analysts said consumers seem to be spending more on clothing, furniture and other discretionary items because sharply higher interest rates since June have dampened interest in buying cars and houses. While consumers were shifting into a higher gear, the number of people filing new claims for unemployment benefits dropped for a third straight week to 390,000 last week, a sign that the stagnant job market may be improving. The four-week average of new jobless claims compiled by the Labor Department dropped below 400,000 for the first time since February. Businesses so far during the economic recovery have met growing demand with the same or fewer workers because of strong productivity gains. That continued during the second quarter, with a stunning 5.7 percent jump in productivity reported by the Labor Department yesterday. Analysts said the acceleration in consumer spending seen last month may force businesses to start adding workers soon. The "amazing" productivity gains eked out by businesses and workers in the last few years have been "the silver lining in the jobless recovery," said Bill Cheney, chief economist for John Hancock Financial Services. But "based on today's jobless claims report, this recovery may not be jobless that much longer." .... (Continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- But you didn't. Most respectfully, John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD The Washington Times? The Moonie Paper? Hehehe. Trash is as trash reads/ |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
F330 GT wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message news ![]() earnings," said company president and chief executive Lee Scott. Lots Snipped How can this be? The economic news, according to most libs, is absolutely atrocious. Millions upon millions are out of work and looking hard for jobs. (Many more millions just draw their welfare checks.) The USA is sinking rapidly. And, its all George's fault. Yet WM is going crazy, as are many other retailers. Is it because only the 'rich' shop at WM? After all, they are the only ones to have received any benefits from a tax cut. Right? Have I just gotten more stupid in my old age? Respectfully, John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD Things are not always as they seem in the stock market. That's why Walmart stock went down upon releasing it's earnings. Looking farther into it: "A turnaround in the Sam's Club division helped Wal-Mart overcome disappointing results at its namesake stores and post a 20 percent jump in quarterly profit, the company said Wednesday. Sales at the company's namesake and core unit, however, missed sales expectations amid a challenging retail environment and deeper discounting than anticipated. Scott noted too that sales in the last two weeks of the quarter were driven by smaller tax withholdings and the child-credit rebate. He added that consumer spending could not continue to hold up the economy without job growth." The press release also noted that international sales were up 18.8% which accounted for much of the increase in sales. Barry Please, don't confuse our simple-minded righties with hard economic facts, eh? They might burst a blood vessel. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:33:35 GMT, "Jim" wrote: Is the proverbial glass always half empty for you Gene? Certainly not, but then, I'm not afraid to face reality, either. Wearing rose colored glasses serves no useful purpose that I am aware of. So show me where I am viewing life with rose colored glasses Eugene. Please provide some facts showing the economy is on a decline. As you (should) know the current state of the economy, especially when considering the forecast state of affairs, is about the worst the libs (come on Eugene, admit you are one) could imagine....Improved retail sales, drastic gains in the stock market (DJ and Nasdaq), increased productivity, lower unemployment, rock bottom interest rates...the list goes on. And the economy is only expected to improve in the coming months. A libs nightmare when a Republican is President! Right Gene? |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! Perhaps a taste of reality is in order here, eh? Wal-Mart's second-quarter net income increased to $2.44 billion, or 56 cents a share, compared with $2.02 billion, or 45 cents a share, a year earlier. That result included four cents in earnings from discontinued operations, with a gain from the sale of its McLane grocery-wholesaling unit. Net income from continuing operations rose 15% to $2.3 billion, or 52 cents a share, from $2.0 billion, or 45 cents a share, the company said. The result was in line with estimates given last week when Wal-Mart reported July sales. Sales increased 11% to $62.6 billion, while same-store sales increased 3.2%. "Consumer spending remained sluggish for most of the second quarter, and Wal- Mart struggled to rid itself of bloated inventories, which had grown faster than sales during the previous quarter. Heavy markdowns pressured profits, and inventory at the close of the quarter was up 9% from year-ago levels - slightly less than sales, but greater than the company's longer-term goal for inventory to grow at less than half the rate of sales. Comparable-store inventories increased by a low-single-digit percentage, Wal-Mart said. "Despite the markdowns, Wal-Mart managed to shore up profits, CEO Scott said. The company reduced its rate of "shrinkage," or losses from stolen and damaged goods, and continued to reap new benefits from increased buying from cheaper manufacturers overseas. "In addition, food margins improved even as domestic comparable-food sales increased 7% to 9%. The company noted that sales of fresh food, particularly at its Sam's Club unit, have grown swiftly. Fresh food carries a higher-than- average margin at the company, noted Bill Dreher, an analyst at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York." Not that rosy a picture. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:34:59 -0700, "jps" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:12:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Doug, the question referred to the fact that people are spending more money, not where they are spending it. How can you assert that when the news simply reflected Walmart and not the general state of discount retailers? How are Walmart's competition doing? If they're doing well, then you may have a case. If not, money may simply be shifting from one retail outfit to another, potentially based on price. See, there's more of the conservative vs. liberal thinking. Our lot is willing to be patient and make a judgement when all the data is in. You folks want to make a case on one month, one day, one report. Sorry bud, that dog won't hunt. Gosh, jps, I'd have expected you to do this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Economy shows further signs of recovering By Patrice Hill THE WASHINGTON TIMES More signs that the economy is gathering strength emerged yesterday as big retailers like Wal-Mart reported their best sales in a year while productivity boomed and unemployment claims dropped for a third straight week. The increase in same-store sales last month, at 4.3 percent, was nearly double the pace set in May and June in a survey of big department stores by the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. Wal-Mart, the biggest retailer, said better-than-expected sales were partly the result of tax rebate checks. With consumer momentum building, the retailer boosted its profit outlook for the rest of the year. "It was a good month, and it may be a good omen for the second half," said Michael P. Niemira, vice president of the Tokyo bank. Although warm weather and heavy discounting by retailers accounted for some of the gains, "this could be the start of a much better trend," he said. Some analysts said consumers seem to be spending more on clothing, furniture and other discretionary items because sharply higher interest rates since June have dampened interest in buying cars and houses. While consumers were shifting into a higher gear, the number of people filing new claims for unemployment benefits dropped for a third straight week to 390,000 last week, a sign that the stagnant job market may be improving. The four-week average of new jobless claims compiled by the Labor Department dropped below 400,000 for the first time since February. Businesses so far during the economic recovery have met growing demand with the same or fewer workers because of strong productivity gains. That continued during the second quarter, with a stunning 5.7 percent jump in productivity reported by the Labor Department yesterday. Analysts said the acceleration in consumer spending seen last month may force businesses to start adding workers soon. The "amazing" productivity gains eked out by businesses and workers in the last few years have been "the silver lining in the jobless recovery," said Bill Cheney, chief economist for John Hancock Financial Services. But "based on today's jobless claims report, this recovery may not be jobless that much longer." .... (Continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- But you didn't. Most respectfully, John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD The Washington Times? The Moonie Paper? Hehehe. Trash is as trash reads/ Perhaps you prefer these NY Times headlines: Forecasts for U.S. Recovery Improved Wal-Mart, TIffany report Earnings Surge Retail Sales Rise 1.4% in July Wal-Marts Profits Rise More Than 20% |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive
economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! The Debt To the Penny Current Amount 08/12/2003 6,744,943,168,393.25 Current Month 08/11/2003 6,741,975,510,157.17 08/08/2003 $6,741,662,308,948.83 08/07/2003 $6,738,632,001,233.74 08/06/2003 $6,735,127,561,462.54 08/05/2003 $6,736,678,634,901.89 08/04/2003 $6,732,382,078,949.43 08/01/2003 $6,727,587,083,455.60 Prior Months 07/31/2003 $6,751,195,107,063.07 06/30/2003 $6,670,121,155,027.26 05/30/2003 $6,558,146,735,285.55 04/30/2003 $6,460,380,745,789.28 03/31/2003 $6,460,776,256,578.16 02/28/2003 $6,445,790,102,794.08 01/31/2003 $6,401,376,662,047.32 12/31/2002 $6,405,707,456,847.53 11/29/2002 $6,343,460,146,781.79 10/31/2002 $6,282,527,974,378.50 Prior Fiscal Years 09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16 09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62 09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34 09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73 09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39 09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66 09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03 09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25 09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32 09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16 09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00 SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT Looking for more historical information? Visit the Debt Historical Information archives. Updated August 13, 2003 |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... But you didn't. Most respectfully, Long ways to go in the second half. Sorry, but I don't remember you whining when the market dropped 50% *before* GW took office. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How'd you get my personal financial records? ;-)
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! The Debt To the Penny Current Amount 08/12/2003 6,744,943,168,393.25 Current Month 08/11/2003 6,741,975,510,157.17 08/08/2003 $6,741,662,308,948.83 08/07/2003 $6,738,632,001,233.74 08/06/2003 $6,735,127,561,462.54 08/05/2003 $6,736,678,634,901.89 08/04/2003 $6,732,382,078,949.43 08/01/2003 $6,727,587,083,455.60 Prior Months 07/31/2003 $6,751,195,107,063.07 06/30/2003 $6,670,121,155,027.26 05/30/2003 $6,558,146,735,285.55 04/30/2003 $6,460,380,745,789.28 03/31/2003 $6,460,776,256,578.16 02/28/2003 $6,445,790,102,794.08 01/31/2003 $6,401,376,662,047.32 12/31/2002 $6,405,707,456,847.53 11/29/2002 $6,343,460,146,781.79 10/31/2002 $6,282,527,974,378.50 Prior Fiscal Years 09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16 09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62 09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34 09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73 09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39 09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66 09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03 09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25 09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32 09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16 09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00 SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT Looking for more historical information? Visit the Debt Historical Information archives. Updated August 13, 2003 |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
And the source of your quotes and information is?,,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! Perhaps a taste of reality is in order here, eh? Wal-Mart's second-quarter net income increased to $2.44 billion, or 56 cents a share, compared with $2.02 billion, or 45 cents a share, a year earlier. That result included four cents in earnings from discontinued operations, with a gain from the sale of its McLane grocery-wholesaling unit. Net income from continuing operations rose 15% to $2.3 billion, or 52 cents a share, from $2.0 billion, or 45 cents a share, the company said. The result was in line with estimates given last week when Wal-Mart reported July sales. Sales increased 11% to $62.6 billion, while same-store sales increased 3.2%. "Consumer spending remained sluggish for most of the second quarter, and Wal- Mart struggled to rid itself of bloated inventories, which had grown faster than sales during the previous quarter. Heavy markdowns pressured profits, and inventory at the close of the quarter was up 9% from year-ago levels - slightly less than sales, but greater than the company's longer-term goal for inventory to grow at less than half the rate of sales. Comparable-store inventories increased by a low-single-digit percentage, Wal-Mart said. "Despite the markdowns, Wal-Mart managed to shore up profits, CEO Scott said. The company reduced its rate of "shrinkage," or losses from stolen and damaged goods, and continued to reap new benefits from increased buying from cheaper manufacturers overseas. "In addition, food margins improved even as domestic comparable-food sales increased 7% to 9%. The company noted that sales of fresh food, particularly at its Sam's Club unit, have grown swiftly. Fresh food carries a higher-than- average margin at the company, noted Bill Dreher, an analyst at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York." Not that rosy a picture. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD The New York Stock Exchange news story based upon statements from Wal-Mart management and those who analyze Wal-Mart stock. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: And the source of your quotes and information is?,,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Isn't it funny how the libs all of a sudden grow silent when positive economic news like this is reported (during GWB's Presidency)? What a coincidence! Perhaps a taste of reality is in order here, eh? Wal-Mart's second-quarter net income increased to $2.44 billion, or 56 cents a share, compared with $2.02 billion, or 45 cents a share, a year earlier. That result included four cents in earnings from discontinued operations, with a gain from the sale of its McLane grocery-wholesaling unit. Net income from continuing operations rose 15% to $2.3 billion, or 52 cents a share, from $2.0 billion, or 45 cents a share, the company said. The result was in line with estimates given last week when Wal-Mart reported July sales. Sales increased 11% to $62.6 billion, while same-store sales increased 3.2%. "Consumer spending remained sluggish for most of the second quarter, and Wal- Mart struggled to rid itself of bloated inventories, which had grown faster than sales during the previous quarter. Heavy markdowns pressured profits, and inventory at the close of the quarter was up 9% from year-ago levels - slightly less than sales, but greater than the company's longer-term goal for inventory to grow at less than half the rate of sales. Comparable-store inventories increased by a low-single-digit percentage, Wal-Mart said. "Despite the markdowns, Wal-Mart managed to shore up profits, CEO Scott said. The company reduced its rate of "shrinkage," or losses from stolen and damaged goods, and continued to reap new benefits from increased buying from cheaper manufacturers overseas. "In addition, food margins improved even as domestic comparable-food sales increased 7% to 9%. The company noted that sales of fresh food, particularly at its Sam's Club unit, have grown swiftly. Fresh food carries a higher-than- average margin at the company, noted Bill Dreher, an analyst at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York." Not that rosy a picture. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD The New York Stock Exchange news story based upon statements from Wal-Mart management and those who analyze Wal-Mart stock. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. Post a link. Otherwise you, as usual, are full of it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|