On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:09:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 22:29:07 -0500, Reggie Smithers
wrote:

bb wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:17:28 -0600, Skipper wrote:


The fact is, this $300 entry fee would be history if Floriduh
reciprocated with a Piggly Wiggly fee for them.

Piggly Wiggly fee? So now you expect Florida to impose a fee on
Bahamians who take your wife for a ride, just because they expect
cruisers to foot some of the expenses imposed on the Bahamian's due to
their cruising life style? Get real, dude.

bb
BB,
Isn't it possible to disagree with Skipper without the personal insults?

Ya know, I was wondering the same thing. Here is a legitimate thread, providing
information for both sides. But, it has to be drug down by a few who can't resist
going to attack mode.

Un-real!

As for the thread, no, cruise ship passengers aren't required to pay a fee to get off
the ship onto a Bahama Island.



A legitimate thread whose perpetrator introduced racism?

I took it to mean that the black officials voted for the fees and the white
officials didn't. Is it a fact that *all* the government officials in the
Bahamas are black?


--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?

--
John H.


Sorry. I only read about fast cars.

Eisboch :-)

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:40:09 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?

--
John H.


Sorry. I only read about fast cars.

Eisboch :-)


You dingleberry!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?


Road & Track tested the Mustang GT in the December 2004 issue.

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:08:26 -0700, "RG" wrote:


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?


Road & Track tested the Mustang GT in the December 2004 issue.



Thanks! Now all I have to do is find a copy, since Eisboch won't tell me
what it did in the quarter mile.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:08:26 -0700, "RG" wrote:


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?


Road & Track tested the Mustang GT in the December 2004 issue.



Thanks! Now all I have to do is find a copy, since Eisboch won't tell me
what it did in the quarter mile.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...112_0501_bang/

You can buy back issues he http://usedmagazines.com/titles/RoadAndTrack

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:08:26 -0700, "RG" wrote:


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?


Road & Track tested the Mustang GT in the December 2004 issue.



Thanks! Now all I have to do is find a copy, since Eisboch won't tell me
what it did in the quarter mile.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

13.5 @ 103.6

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:08:26 -0700, "RG" wrote:


While you're doing that, and if you take Road and Track, see if you can
find which
issue had the test of the 2005 Mustang GT. Please?


Road & Track tested the Mustang GT in the December 2004 issue.



At least the Mustangs did a job on the BMW M3's at the Daytona Grand-Am
this year.

http://theracesite.com/index.cfm?pag...m_article=8743

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Thanks! Now all I have to do is find a copy, since Eisboch won't tell me
what it did in the quarter mile.

--

Road & Track's stats for the 12/04 article:

0-60 mph: 5.3 sec.
0-100 mph: 13.5 sec.
1/4 mile: 13.9 sec @ 101.4 mph
top speed: 143 mph
braking 60-0 mph: 131 ft.
braking 80-0 mph: 233 ft.
skidpad: .84g
slalom: 64.9 mph
fuel mileage: 18.0 mpg (estimated)

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:08:26 -0700, "RG" wrote:




At least the Mustangs did a job on the BMW M3's at the Daytona Grand-Am
this year.

http://theracesite.com/index.cfm?pag...m_article=8743

--
John H.


Yep. The Mustang does alright for itself mainly due to Ford's outstanding,
high revving, 4.6 liter engine.

An M3 does not equal an M5 however. Although quick (Road & Track tested at
4.1 sec, 0-60 and Car & Driver did 4.2 secs) the real beauty of the M5 is
the handling. I am still working on the 1200 mile break-in period so I
really haven't got on it much, but I do have to keep increasing the speed
limit alarm. From what I hear through, selecting the 500hp Sport mode with
the transmission in the S-6 program results in a mind blowing experience.
We shall see.

Eisboch