Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RG wrote:
. When you say "additional receiver", I assume you mean receiver and antenna both? Yes. Since the boat is some 50 miles away from home, a second dish is pretty much a requirement. The cost of the hardware (specially the dish antennas) is chump change. The cost of the service is directly proportional to the number of premium channels you subscribe to, just like with cable. If you are considering the move to a satellite service, by all means get a receiver with a built-in digital video recorder (same concept as TIVO). I can tell you that it will absolutely change the way you think about, plan for, and ultimately watch TV, and all for the better. The nice part of having the DVR incorporated with the sat receiver is it cuts down on space requirements and cabling, and you use the native guide for selecting recording events. Way cool. On a moving object like a boat, would you continually have to re-aim the dish to get the best signal? |
#42
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: I guess so. We do not have digital cable or HD tv sets so the S-video works just fine for us. Comcast hasn't gone to "digital" cable in your part of the country? Many subscribers, me included up until a few days ago, just have a basic cable service meaning there is no cable box. The cable is simply hooked up to the VHF antenna input on the TV and you use the TV tuner to choose the channels. In this case, all channels are analog. Eisboch We updated a year ago to digital. Getting ready for the big shift to HDTV in the near future. (read:...saving for the TV) When all channels in the US go digital (I believe in 2008 or 2009) there will be no need to upgrade your TV's to HD if you have cable. Huh? HD and digital are two different things. I never said otherwise Don. here's what Consumer Reports says about HD vs standard def vs ED Image quality: HD vs. standard definition High definition is the way to go if you want the best TV viewing possible. The picture quality can be stunning, especially on a large, wide-screen set. HD is a digital-TV format that can offer almost-lifelike clarity. That’s because HD images contain more and finer detail than other formats. In technical terms, they have higher resolution, or more picture elements making up each image. HD images are digital, usually with definition of either 1080i (1,080 lines drawn on-screen in an odd/even, or interlaced, pattern) or 720p (720 lines scanned in one sweep, or progressively). You can get HD capability in all types of TVs: picture-tube sets, LCD, plasma, rear-projection, and front-projection. However, simply buying an HDTV doesn't get you HD. You need programming that’s created in HD and transmitted the same way, plus a digital tuner (usually supplied by special cable and satellite boxes) that can receive these signals. See our HDTV report for more details. Standard definition, the type of TV we've watched for years, has much less detail. These are analog signals with resolution of 480i (480 lines drawn onscreen in an interlaced pattern), the format in which TV content is delivered over regular analog broadcasts and basic (non-digital) cable. On the best TVs, the picture quality can be very good or even excellent--but it doesn't compare to the best that HD can offer. Most standard-definition TVs now on the market are picture-tube sets; some LCDs of this type are also available. Enhanced definition falls in between standard and high definition. ED signals are digital, with resolution of 480p (480 lines scanned progressively). This is equivalent to DVD quality, which is a little better than standard definition but not as good as high definition. Some ED sets can decode HD signals when they're connected to a digital tuner. However, they have to convert them to a lower resolution that they can display, so the picture quality won't match that of true HD. Still, it can be quite impressive. Most ED sets now on the market are either LCD or plasma TVs. |
#43
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:53:58 GMT, Don White wrote:
JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: I guess so. We do not have digital cable or HD tv sets so the S-video works just fine for us. Comcast hasn't gone to "digital" cable in your part of the country? Many subscribers, me included up until a few days ago, just have a basic cable service meaning there is no cable box. The cable is simply hooked up to the VHF antenna input on the TV and you use the TV tuner to choose the channels. In this case, all channels are analog. Eisboch We updated a year ago to digital. Getting ready for the big shift to HDTV in the near future. (read:...saving for the TV) When all channels in the US go digital (I believe in 2008 or 2009) there will be no need to upgrade your TV's to HD if you have cable. Huh? HD and digital are two different things. I never said otherwise Don. here's what Consumer Reports says about HD vs standard def vs ED Image quality: HD vs. standard definition High definition is the way to go if you want the best TV viewing possible. The picture quality can be stunning, especially on a large, wide-screen set. HD is a digital-TV format that can offer almost-lifelike clarity. That’s because HD images contain more and finer detail than other formats. In technical terms, they have higher resolution, or more picture elements making up each image. HD images are digital, usually with definition of either 1080i (1,080 lines drawn on-screen in an odd/even, or interlaced, pattern) or 720p (720 lines scanned in one sweep, or progressively). You can get HD capability in all types of TVs: picture-tube sets, LCD, plasma, rear-projection, and front-projection. However, simply buying an HDTV doesn't get you HD. You need programming that’s created in HD and transmitted the same way, plus a digital tuner (usually supplied by special cable and satellite boxes) that can receive these signals. See our HDTV report for more details. Standard definition, the type of TV we've watched for years, has much less detail. These are analog signals with resolution of 480i (480 lines drawn onscreen in an interlaced pattern), the format in which TV content is delivered over regular analog broadcasts and basic (non-digital) cable. On the best TVs, the picture quality can be very good or even excellent--but it doesn't compare to the best that HD can offer. Most standard-definition TVs now on the market are picture-tube sets; some LCDs of this type are also available. Enhanced definition falls in between standard and high definition. ED signals are digital, with resolution of 480p (480 lines scanned progressively). This is equivalent to DVD quality, which is a little better than standard definition but not as good as high definition. Some ED sets can decode HD signals when they're connected to a digital tuner. However, they have to convert them to a lower resolution that they can display, so the picture quality won't match that of true HD. Still, it can be quite impressive. Most ED sets now on the market are either LCD or plasma TVs. HD is the way to go, Don. But, Eisboch is right. You'll start seeing a lot more facial hair and zits. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#44
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... On a moving object like a boat, would you continually have to re-aim the dish to get the best signal? Yes, if you had a desire to have a TV signal while underway or on the hook at a remote location. There are relatively small sat domes that can be installed that will automatically track the satellite(s) under such conditions. Last time I checked, they were around $3,000. But it's been a while since I looked at them, so they might have come down some since then. I have no such need for a signal while underway. My dish is attached to a pole that resides in a receptacle designed for just such a purpose. The receptacle for the pole is right next to the boat on the dock in my marina. My boat is factory pre-wired for TV, and there is a cable receptacle in the storage locker in the transom, right next to the shore power receptacle, telephone receptacle, and pressurized city water receptacle. So, I am limited to a live TV broadcast while in the slip, which also means that the cost of my antenna was just next to nothing. If I wish to watch TV while out and about, I carry a number of VHS tapes or DVDs of shows that I have previously recorded from my DVR satellite receiver at home. I'll also use these if I can't find anything interesting live on the 100+ sat channels I carry. |
#45
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:09:41 -0700, "RG" wrote:
There are relatively small sat domes that can be installed that will automatically track the satellite(s) under such conditions. Last time I checked, they were around $3,000. ================================ There's a relatively new system called "Follow Me TV" available for about $900 which does azimuth only. Supposedly it works well at anchor. Haven't tried it but have gotten good reports. http://www.followmetv.com/ |
#46
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " There's a relatively new system called "Follow Me TV" available for about $900 which does azimuth only. Supposedly it works well at anchor. Haven't tried it but have gotten good reports. http://www.followmetv.com/ I suppose that would be one way to go, but I see two fundamental problems with it. Since it only compensates for azimuth, it would be less effective on smaller boats, which are more prone to pitch and roll, even at anchor. It's ironic that the larger the boat, the more effective this system might be, but also, the larger the boat the more likely the owner could afford one of the more expensive systems that will fully track a satellite under all conditions and vectors. The other problem I see is that this system is essentially a device to rotate a standard mini-dish. This means that the ugly mini dish is displayed on your boat in front of God and everybody to see. Personally I think the dishes are ugly and not very nautical looking (and prone to rust in a salt water environment I would suspect), and I'm more than happy to leave mine behind, permanently mounted to the dock when I'm out boating. Just an aesthetics thing. I thought the photo in your link showing the dish mounted to railing was just hideous looking. At least with the big dollar systems, the dish is fully enclosed in a plastic dome, which I think looks much more appropriate on a boat. You could even pass it off to the unknowing as some sort of sophisticated satellite communications system. |
#47
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:30:06 -0700, "RG" wrote:
At least with the big dollar systems, the dish is fully enclosed in a plastic dome, which I think looks much more appropriate on a boat. You could even pass it off to the unknowing as some sort of sophisticated satellite communications system. I have some of the same concerns which is one reason that we haven't bought anything yet. There is no question that the domes offer better appearance and weather protection. I haven't seen anything less than about $5K however which will still buy a lot of DVDs. I can get news and weather from the internet just about everywhere. |
#48
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I haven't seen anything less than about $5K however which will still buy a lot of DVDs. Exactly. I record quite a bit of programming to my DVR, then transfer it to tape to watch on the boat whenever and wherever it's convenient. The DVR makes time-shifting incredibly easy. Transferring the content to tape significantly degrades the quality, but it's just generic TV, so I can live with it. One of these days I'll get around to replacing my DVD player in the AV rack at home with a DVD recorder, and then the stuff I take out to the boat would have excellent quality. Another solution would be to replace the sat receiver in the boat with a receiver that has a built in DVR, like the one I have at home. Just program a week or two worth of recordings before leaving the boat, and then you can play them back with no quality degradation, even when the receiver is away from the dock-mounted dish. I've thought about it, but my boat is only 29' long, and it will get knocked around at times. Not too sure if the hard drives in these DVR's would appreciate that or not. |
#49
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
Don White wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: I guess so. We do not have digital cable or HD tv sets so the S-video works just fine for us. Comcast hasn't gone to "digital" cable in your part of the country? Many subscribers, me included up until a few days ago, just have a basic cable service meaning there is no cable box. The cable is simply hooked up to the VHF antenna input on the TV and you use the TV tuner to choose the channels. In this case, all channels are analog. Eisboch We updated a year ago to digital. Getting ready for the big shift to HDTV in the near future. (read:...saving for the TV) When you are ready to buy, take a long look at the glass tube flat screen HD TVs before you pay extra for one of the thin screens. It is still true that the glass tube TVs produce better pictures, and without your being able to see pixels. And, of course, the viewing angle with a glass tube TV is still wider than that of an LCD or plasma (overpriced) screen. I've been keeping close watch on Consumer Reports magazine (just paid the $12.00 US so I could search online) for any ecommendations in HD TVs. Quite a choice between the CRT type, LCDs, Plasma & DLP. I'll increase my research when I get close to buying one. My smaller living room (in a WW2 era house) calls for a 32" max. Anything bigger is getting hard to lug around. At the moment, SONY makes a gem of a 32" flat screen LCD. I'll try to find the model number. Of all the 32's I've seen it was by far the brightest and sharpest. Unfortunately, it was about $1700. Where do they make that sweet TV? |
#50
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around 1/6/2006 10:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:
You can subscribe to it and it only costs about 12.95 a month. ?? Man, Comcast needs some serious competition in our area! Basic analog cable is $44.50(!) a month, and basic digital is about $60, plus the cost of renting the set-top box. -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -- Kenneth Grahame ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Consumer Reports for boats?? | Cruising | |||
Free Maptech BSB Electronic Navigation Charts | Cruising | |||
USA Electronic Charts and software? | Cruising |