Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
White House Staffers to Infiltrate al Qaeda, Lean bin Laden's Location | General |