JohnH,
Harry knows when it is time to tuck his tail and run.


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 18:18:02 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and
bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with
terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we
invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?
Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John
No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He
"brags" about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service
in the reserves and his "huge" salary.



I seem to recall you bragging about your compensation as a senior
executive in 1976 earning $205,000/year (2005 USD's).
No brag. I responded to a question. I never thought it was that much
then,
and I don't think it was that much now. I knew plenty of guys in the ad
biz in DC back then who were making far more.

I thought you never talked about your earnings Harry.


Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.