Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: Ummm ah... I guess we are. You guess you are what??? -- John H Talking about doorknobs. Try to keep up with the group. Get a back bone and starnd up for yourself and stop copying what others are saying. |
#122
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:18:35 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: John H. wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:41:15 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. You can't even get *that* right. It isn't the birth of "our" lord, dummy. It's not even the birth of *your* lord. I changed it to keep you happy and festive. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace and fellowship on the Christmas Holy Day as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. You mean, the alleged birthday of *your* lord, fella. "Our" lord implies a universality that non-Christians would find offensive. I'm sure you don't want to offend billions of people, eh? Oh, and his name wasn't Jesus Christ. That isn't even close. When I use the word "our", I'm referring to you and me, Harry. Should I change it to say, "...the birth of *your* Lord, Jesus Christ"? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
#123
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. You can't even get *that* right. It isn't the birth of "our" lord, dummy. It's not even the birth of *your* lord. Their you go again, telling everyone what they believe and how they should whorship. You really do want to be a dictator don't you? "Narcissists are totally and inflexibly authoritarian. In other words, they are suck-ups. They want to be authority figures and, short of that, they want to be associated with authority figures. In their hearts, they know they can't think well, have no judgment about what matters, are not connected with the world they inhabit, so they cling fanatically to the opinions of people they regard as authority figures -- such as their parents, teachers, doctors, ministers. Where relevant, this may include scientists or professors or artists, but narcissists stick to people they know personally, since they aren't engaged enough with the world to get their authoritative opinions from TV, movies, books or dead geniuses/saints/heroes. If they get in trouble over some or another opinion they've put forth, they'll blame the source -- "It was okay with Dr. Somebody," "My father taught me that," etc." |
#124
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Robbins wrote:
Get a back bone and *starnd* up for yourself and stop copying what others are saying. I will...as soon as you tell me what *starnd* means. |
#125
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: Get a back bone and *starnd* up for yourself and stop copying what others are saying. I will...as soon as you tell me what *starnd* means. Read between the lines Don, have you ever mis-spelled a word? |
#126
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't been to the site in a while. I live aboard and especially this time of year when all the seasonal boaters have gone for the season I love to post in the boating forums. I wasn't sure in anyone was even interested in boating in this forum anymore.
|
#127
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO, It is both!!
"Somawas" wrote in message news ![]() It's all political BS. A good reason to read other boating groups if you are interested in boats. On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:02:34 -0600, "John" wrote: I don't mean to be rude, but there are considerable more polictical posts on this group then there are boats. Shouldn't we stay on target and post the polictical BS on another site? |
#128
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry,
You have forgotten more about boats than most of us will ever know. Maybe you could add a boating post to help get the ball rolling. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... FREDO wrote: IMHO, It is both!! "Somawas" wrote in message news ![]() It's all political BS. A good reason to read other boating groups if you are interested in boats. On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:02:34 -0600, "John" wrote: I don't mean to be rude, but there are considerable more polictical posts on this group then there are boats. Shouldn't we stay on target and post the polictical BS on another site? I looked through 50 posts here. I skipped over the lawnmower outboard discussion since I've seen it and contributed to it in previous discussions, I'm not interested in old sails, and I know enough about internet security already for my purposes. Oh... I guessed the "dog" discussion was not about boats, so I skipped that one, too. No offense, but if you want a "boating discussion group," it would help to have some interesting boating related posts, eh? |
#129
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
FREDO wrote: IMHO, It is both!! "Somawas" wrote in message news ![]() It's all political BS. A good reason to read other boating groups if you are interested in boats. On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:02:34 -0600, "John" wrote: I don't mean to be rude, but there are considerable more polictical posts on this group then there are boats. Shouldn't we stay on target and post the polictical BS on another site? I looked through 50 posts here. I skipped over the lawnmower outboard discussion since I've seen it and contributed to it in previous discussions, I'm not interested in old sails, and I know enough about internet security already for my purposes. Oh... I guessed the "dog" discussion was not about boats, so I skipped that one, too. No offense, but if you want a "boating discussion group," it would help to have some interesting boating related posts, eh? Harry, Are you lobbying for OT posts? Who wouldn't expect the traffic here to slow down if/when OT posts are eliminated? For those of us who tune in to read boating posts, there is no disappointment when the crap is gone. It actually saves a lot of time wading through the BS that should be here. Some of the best groups I read are small and on-topic. If you post a question you don't have to sort through 100+ OT posts to get your answer. Is your last comment some sort of way to condone the inclusion of political and other OT posts just for the sake of adding something to read? There are many other groups for many other topics. Dan |
#130
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Dan Krueger wrote: Harry Krause wrote: FREDO wrote: IMHO, It is both!! "Somawas" wrote in message news ![]() It's all political BS. A good reason to read other boating groups if you are interested in boats. On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:02:34 -0600, "John" wrote: I don't mean to be rude, but there are considerable more polictical posts on this group then there are boats. Shouldn't we stay on target and post the polictical BS on another site? I looked through 50 posts here. I skipped over the lawnmower outboard discussion since I've seen it and contributed to it in previous discussions, I'm not interested in old sails, and I know enough about internet security already for my purposes. Oh... I guessed the "dog" discussion was not about boats, so I skipped that one, too. No offense, but if you want a "boating discussion group," it would help to have some interesting boating related posts, eh? Harry, Are you lobbying for OT posts? Who wouldn't expect the traffic here to slow down if/when OT posts are eliminated? For those of us who tune in to read boating posts, there is no disappointment when the crap is gone. It actually saves a lot of time wading through the BS that should be here. Some of the best groups I read are small and on-topic. If you post a question you don't have to sort through 100+ OT posts to get your answer. Is your last comment some sort of way to condone the inclusion of political and other OT posts just for the sake of adding something to read? There are many other groups for many other topics. Dan Off topic posts bother me not at all. I can read them or not, and usually can decide that based on the headers or the responders. I'm looking forward to the next discussions here of boat names, Bayliners, and expertise dispensed by non-boaters. Harry, it is Christmas Day. Chill and enjoy the day with your guests and family. The forum is now a pleasant place to come. We don't need bayliner bashing, politics, name calling or cussing. Things are running just fine now. Enjoy it. Merry Christmas. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2100 down, how many more to go? | General | |||
Where to go besides rec.boats????? | General | |||
Boating Group | General |